Revisiting the Classification of Moderate and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Based on the Admission Glasgow Coma Scale Score

Abstract

Objective We study the clinical relevance of classifying traumatic brain injury (TBI) into moderate and mild categories based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission with respect to the treatment intensity and 6-month mortality and morbidity rates.

Methods Analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained database admitted at a level I trauma center from 2013 to 2019 with an admission GCS score between 9 and 15 and a minimum follow-up of 6 months post-TBI was done to study the treatment intensity and 6-month morbidity and mortality rates for each GCS score from 9 to 15.

Results In all, 2,060 patients met the study criteria, of which 1,684 were males (81.7%). Road traffic accident was the most common cause of TBI (83.7%). There was a significant linear increase in the proportion of patients who had good outcomes with increasing GCS scores from 9 to 15 (p ≤ 0.001). When the variables in each GCS score were compared with a GCS score of 15, there was an increase in the odds ratio of mortality and poor outcome with decreasing GCS scores (p ≤ 0.001). Patients with a lower admission GCS score required more intense treatment in the form of surgery and ventilation (p ≤ 0.00001). There was a higher incidence of pupillary asymmetry in patients with lower GCS scores (p ≤ 0.00001).

Conclusions The classification of TBI patients into moderate and mild based on the GCS score at admission is not of any practical value, and TBI patients may be more usefully classified based on the admission GCS score into severe and not severe groups.

Keywords

TBI classification - GCS score - outcomes - mild and moderate TBI - GOS-E

Note

This article was presented at NEUROTRAUMA 2022.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design were done by M.J., A.P.A., and G.S. Drafting of the article was done by G.S. and M.J. Statistical analysis was performed by T.M.. M.J. is the guarantor.

Publication History

Article published online:
25 April 2023

• References

• 1 Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S. et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2018; 130 (04) 1-18
• 2 Gururaj G. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario. Neurol Res 2002; 24 (01) 24-28
• 3 Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2 (7872): 81-84
• 4 Rowley G, Fielding K. Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users. Lancet 1991; 337 (8740): 535-538
• 5 Bullock R. Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 1 Guideline for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2000; 17: 451-553
• 6 Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T. et al; MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ 2008; 336 (7641): 425-429
• 7 Mena JH, Sanchez AI, Rubiano AM. et al. Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13. J Trauma 2011; 71 (05) 1185-1192 , discussion 1193
• 8 Kortbeek JB, Al Turki SA, Ali J. et al. Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change. J Trauma 2008; 64 (06) 1638-1650
• 9 Smits M, Dippel DW, de Haan GG. et al. External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005; 294 (12) 1519-1525
• 10 Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH. et al. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA 2005; 294 (12) 1511-1518
• 11 Norwood SH, McAuley CE, Berne JD, Vallina VL, Creath RG, McLarty J. A prehospital Glasgow coma scale score < or = 14 accurately predicts the need for full trauma team activation and patient hospitalization after motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma 2002; 53 (03) 503-507
• 12 Fearnside M, McDougall P. Moderate head injury: a system of neurotrauma care. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68 (01) 58-64
• 13 Stein SC, Ross SE. Moderate head injury: a guide to initial management. J Neurosurg 1992; 77 (04) 562-564
• 14 Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998; 15 (08) 573-585
• 15 Miller JD. Minor, moderate and severe head injury. Neurosurg Rev 1986; 9 (1–2): 135-139
• 16 Culotta VP, Sementilli ME, Gerold K, Watts CC. Clinicopathological heterogeneity in the classification of mild head injury. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (02) 245-250
• 17 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M. Mild head injury: mortality and complication rate—meta-analysis of findings in a systematic literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003; 145 (10) 843-850 , discussion 850
• 18 Stein SC, Ross SE. The value of computed tomographic scans in patients with low-risk head injuries. Neurosurgery 1990; 26 (04) 638-640