CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(01): 065-072
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768472
Review Article

The Effect of Dental Implant Drills Materials on Heat Generation in Osteotomy Sites: A Systematic Review

Shreyasi Chakraborty
1   Department of Implant Dentistry, BPP University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
3   Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Waad Kheder
2   Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
3   Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of this review was to examine the impact of dental implant drill materials and wear profiles on heat generation in the osteotomy sites as reported in experimental studies and to critically appraise these studies. The research question was formulated based on predefined patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) elements. A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken in Medline/PubMed Central, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, using predetermined keywords, followed by a manual search of the bibliography of the selected articles. The selection of the studies for the critical appraisal part of our study was based on the criteria used to assess the study designs such as study aims, outcome measure, clarity of method, sample selection, randomization, allocation concealment, sample attrition, bias, method of data analysis, and external validity. Increased heat generation was observed with both ceramic and metal drills; the heat generation was proportional to drills' wear. The literature was inconclusive regarding the association between drill material and heat generation. However, drill materials had a significant influence on the overall temperature increase during osteotomy. The noncoated drills showed a higher wear resistance, and it has been observed that using worn drills leads to more friction contact, reduced drill cutting efficiency, and increased heat generation. Eleven in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria, and showed a considerable methodological heterogeneity and confounding factors, including drill geometry, speed and load, depth and diameter, number of uses, irrigation protocol, study specimens, and the heat measuring device. Besides, most of the studies have a potential operator and assessor bias, and some have sponsorship bias. It is possible to conclude that the literature is not conclusive on the effect of drill materials on heat generation during osteotomy. Lack of standardization and uniformity in the study design, along with potential bias in the study methodology can be the reason for the heterogeneity of the results.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 June 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Chauhan CJ, Shah DN, Sutaria FB. Various bio-mechanical factors affecting heat generation during osteotomy preparation: a systematic review. Indian J Dent Res 2018; 29 (01) 81-92
  • 2 Hein C, Inceoglu S, Juma D, Zuckerman L. Heat generation during bone drilling: a comparison between industrial and orthopaedic drill bits. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (02) e55-e59
  • 3 Mishra SK, Chowdhary R. Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drills. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014; 14 (02) 131-143
  • 4 Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Vulpiani MP. Effect of temperature on the dental implant osseointegration development in low-density bone: an in vivo histological evaluation. Implant Dent 2015; 24 (01) 96-100
  • 5 Augustin G, Zigman T, Davila S. et al. Cortical bone drilling and thermal osteonecrosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2012; 27 (04) 313-325
  • 6 Möhlhenrich SC, Modabber A, Steiner T, Mitchell DA, Hölzle F. Heat generation and drill wear during dental implant site preparation: systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53 (08) 679-689
  • 7 Bayerlein T, Proff P, Richter G, Dietze S, Fanghänel J, Gedrange T. The use of ceramic drills on a zirconium oxide basis in bone preparation. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2006; 65 (01) 72-74
  • 8 Scarano A, Carinci F, Quaranta A, Di Iorio D, Assenza B, Piattelli A. Effects of bur wear during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2007; 20 (1, Suppl 1): 23-26
  • 9 Sumer M, Misir AF, Telcioglu NT, Guler AU, Yenisey M. Comparison of heat generation during implant drilling using stainless steel and ceramic drills. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69 (05) 1350-1354
  • 10 Batista Mendes GC, Padovan LEM, Ribeiro-Júnior PD, Sartori EM, Valgas L, Claudino M. Influence of implant drill materials on wear, deformation, and roughness after repeated drilling and sterilization. Implant Dent 2014; 23 (02) 188-194
  • 11 Oliveira N, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F. Thermal changes and drill wear in bovine bone during implant site preparation. A comparative in vitro study: twisted stainless steel and ceramic drills. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 (08) 963-969
  • 12 Harder S, Egert C, Wenz HJ, Jochens A, Kern M. Influence of the drill material and method of cooling on the development of intrabony temperature during preparation of the site of an implant. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51 (01) 74-78
  • 13 Allsobrook OFL, Leichter J, Holborrow D, Swain M. Descriptive study of the longevity of dental implant surgery drills. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13 (03) 244-254
  • 14 Koo KT, Kim MH, Kim HY, Wikesjö UME, Yang JH, Yeo IS. Effects of implant drill wear, irrigation, and drill materials on heat generation in osteotomy sites. J Oral Implantol 2015; 41 (02) e19-e23
  • 15 Scarano A, Lorusso F, Noumbissi S. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with steel vs. zirconia implant drill. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (01) 148
  • 16 Tur D, Giannis K, Unger E, Mittlböck M, Rausch-Fan X, Strbac GD. Thermal effects of various drill materials during implant site preparation—ceramic vs. stainless steel drills: a comparative in vitro study in a standardised bovine bone model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32 (02) 154-166
  • 17 Yoshida K, Uoshima K, Oda K, Maeda T. Influence of heat stress to matrix on bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (08) 782-790
  • 18 Eriksson RA, Adell R. Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44 (01) 4-7
  • 19 Moshiri Z, Roshanaei G, Vafaei F, Kadkhodazadeh M. Evaluation the effect of drill type on heat generation in implant drilling site. Res J Med Sci 2013; 7 (5–6): 118-122
  • 20 Er N, Alkan A, Ilday S, Bengu E. Improved dental implant drill durability and performance using heat and wear resistant protective coatings. J Oral Implantol 2018; 44 (03) 168-175
  • 21 Hochscheidt CJ, Shimizu RH, Andrighetto AR, Moura LM, Golin AL, Hochscheidt RC. Thermal variation during osteotomy with different dental implant drills: a standardized study in bovine ribs. Implant Dent 2017; 26 (01) 73-79
  • 22 Koopaie M, Kolahdouz S, Kolahdouz EM. Comparison of wear and temperature of zirconia and tungsten carbide tools in drilling bone: in vitro and finite element analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 57 (06) 557-565
  • 23 Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14 (01) 127-136