Consumer Informatics and One Health: Shifting the Focus from the Individual to the Globe. Findings from the Yearbook 2023 Section on Education and Consumer Health Informatics

Pascal Staccini; Annie Y.S. Lau; Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Consumer Health Informatics

doi:10.1055/s-0043-1768749

Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2023; 32(01): 158-168
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768749

Section 5: Consumer Health Informatics and Education

Synopsis

Consumer Informatics and One Health: Shifting the Focus from the Individual to the Globe. Findings from the Yearbook 2023 Section on Education and Consumer Health Informatics

Pascal Staccini

¹URE RETINES, Faculté de Médecine, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France

,

Annie Y.S. Lau

²Center for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia

,

Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Consumer Health Informatics

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To summarise the state of the art during the year 2022 in consumer health informatics and education, with a special emphasis on “One Health”.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of articles published in PubMed. We build queries to merge terms related to “consumer health informatics”, “one health”, and “digital”. We retrieved 94 potential articles for review. These articles were screened according to topic relevance and 12 were selected for consideration of best paper candidates, which were then presented to a panel of international experts for full paper review and scoring. The top five papers were discussed in a consensus meeting. Three papers received the highest score from the expert panel, and these papers were selected to be representative papers on consumer informatics for exploring one health from consumer perspective in the year 2022.

Results: Bibliometrics analysis conducted on words found in abstracts of the 12 candidate papers revealed four clusters of articles, where clustering outcomes explained 96.91% of the dispersion. The first cluster composes three papers related to patient engagement in primary care practices, using digital-delivered diabetes prevention programmes, or exploring citizen involvement in co-designing environmental projects (such as air pollution exposure and health). The second cluster represents four papers related to digital health literacy and consumer behavior, such as digital vaccine literacy, and food labelling influences and whether displaying Nutri- and Eco-Score at food product level led to improved consumer choices. The third cluster consists of two papers exploring strategies to involve citizens in various science projects while analyzing the quality of citizen-collected data (e.g., mosquito bites or gastropod community dataset). The last cluster contains three papers related to the relationships between human behavior with their environment and their contribution to citizen science projects (e.g., biological water quality in the Netherlands distribution, composition, abundance of debris across sandy beaches in Australia and its regions, urbanization and reptile biodiversity across Florida).

Conclusion: Traditionally, consumer health informatics focuses on providing individuals with tools and resources to actively manage their own health. By incorporating a global health (or one health) perspective, our field is now at a crossroad, demanding us to think beyond the individual and challenging us to instill the thinking that our actions not only have consequences on the individual but also on the population and the environment. Perhaps this is also a reflective time for the consumer informatics field, to consider shifting the focus from the individual to one that is more aligned with one health, helping consumers gain awareness of how their actions impact on the individual, the population and the environment, and providing them with tools to work collectively to help decide how their actions may bring benefits (as well as harms) across these levels.

Keywords

Consumer health informatics - health literacy - digital literacy - citizen science projects - One Health

Full Text

References

References
1 Arnott Smith C. Consumer Health Informatics as a Field. In: Arnott Smith C, Keselman A, editors. Consumer Health Informatics: Enabling Digital Health for Everyone. Boca Raton: CRC Press;2021.p. 25-31.
2 WHO. One Health; 2017 [Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/one-health, accessed June 10, 2023].
3 Benis A, Tamburis O, Chronaki C, Moen A. One Digital Health: A Unified Framework for Future Health Ecosystems. J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e22189. doi: 10.2196/22189.
4 Comte B, Baumbach J, Benis A, Basilio J, Debeljak N, Flobak A, et al. Network and systems medicine: Position paper of the European Collaboration on Science and Technology Action on Open Multiscale Systems Medicine. Netw Syst Med 2020 Jul 06;3(1):67-90. doi: 10.1089/nsm.2020.0004.
5 Borrett SR, Fath BD, Whipple SJ. Introduction to the special issue “Systems Ecology: A Network Perspective and Retrospective”. Ecological Modelling 2014 Dec 10;293:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.005.
6 Ho CW. Operationalizing “One Health” as “One Digital Health” Through a Global Framework That Emphasizes Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits From the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Related Digital Technologies. Front Public Health, 2022;10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.768977.
7 Batista MF, de Carvalho-Ferreira JP, Thimoteo da Cunha D, De Rosso VV. Front-of-package nutrition labeling as a driver for healthier food choices: Lessons learned and future perspectives. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2022 Dec 13. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13085.
8 Aria M, Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2017 ;11(4):959-75.
9 Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research—the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991;22(1):155–205.
10 Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan - a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:210.
11 Cross DA, Stevens MA, Spivack SB, Murray GF, Rodriguez HP, Lewis VA. Survey of Information Exchange and Advanced Use of Other Health Information Technology in Primary Care Settings: Capabilities In and Outside of the Safety Net. Med Care 2022 Feb 1;60(2):140-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001673.
12 Van Rhoon L, McSharry J, Byrne M. Development and testing of a digital health acceptability model to explain the intention to use a digital diabetes prevention programme. Br J Health Psychol 2022 Sep;27(3):716-40. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12569.
13 Gignac F, Righi V, Toran R, Errandonea LP, Ortiz R, Nieuwenhuijsen M, et al. Co-creating a local environmental epidemiology study: the case of citizen science for investigating air pollution and related health risks in Barcelona, Spain. Environ Health 2022 Jan 12;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00826-8.
14 Rosário R, Fronteira I, Martins MRO, Augusto C, Sila MJ, Messer M, et al. Infodemic Preparedness and COVID-19: Searching about Public Health and Social Measures Is Associated with Digital Health Literacy in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912320.
15 Hussain T, Ahmedna T, Marklund M, Appel LJ, Henry ME. Quality assessment of consumer-facing websites on sodium reduction. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2022 Oct;24(10):1285-92. doi: 10.1111/jch.14572.
16 Montagni I, Pouymayou A, Pereira E, Tzourio C, Schück S, Texier N, et al. Measuring Digital Vaccine Literacy: Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Digital Vaccine Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res 2022 Dec 14;24(12):e39220. doi: 10.2196/39220.
17 De Bauw M, De La Revilla LS, Poppe V, Matthys C, Vranken L. Digital nudges to stimulate healthy and pro-environmental food choices in E-groceries. Appetite 2022 May 1;172:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.105971.
18 Pernat N, Zscheischler J, Kampen H, Ostermann-Miyashita E-F, Jeschke JM, Werner D. How media presence triggers participation in citizen science-The case of the mosquito monitoring project ‘Mückenatlas'. PLoS One 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0262850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262850.
19 Serranito B, Diméglio T, Ysnel F, Lizé A, Feunteun E. Small- and large-scale processes including anthropogenic pressures as drivers of gastropod communities in the NE Atlantic coast: A citizen science based approach. Sci Total Environ 2022 Apr 10;816:151600. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151600.
20 Peeters ETHM, Gerritsen AAM, Seelen LMS, Begheyn M, Rienks F, Teurlincx S. Monitoring biological water quality by volunteers complements professional assessments. PLoS One 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0263899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263899.
21 Gacutan J, Johnston EL, Tait H, Smith W, Clark GF. Continental patterns in marine debris revealed by a decade of citizen science. Sci Total Environ 2022 Feb 10;807(Pt 2):150742. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150742.
22 Gainsbury AM, Santos EG, Wiederhecker H. Does urbanization impact terrestrial vertebrate ectotherms across a biodiversity hotspot? Sci Total Environ 2022 Aug 20;835:155446. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155446.