CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Yearb Med Inform 2023; 32(01): 127-137
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1768756
Section 3: Clinical Information Systems
Synopsis

Transforming Clinical Information Systems: Empowering Healthcare through Telemedicine, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence Applications

An Overview of the CIS Section of the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2023
Werner O. Hackl
1   Division for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
,
Sabrina B. Neururer
1   Division for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
2   Tyrolean Federal Institute for Integrated Care, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Bernhard Pfeifer
1   Division for Digital Health and Telemedicine, UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
2   Tyrolean Federal Institute for Integrated Care, Tirol Kliniken GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
,
Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Clinical Information Systems › Author Affiliations

Summary

Objective: In this synopsis, the editors of the Clinical Information Systems (CIS) section of the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics overview recent research and propose a selection of best papers published in 2022 in the CIS field.

Methods: The editors follow a systematic approach to gather relevant articles and select the best papers for the section. This year, they updated the query to incorporate the topic of telemedicine and removed search terms related to geographic information systems. The revised query resulted in a larger number of identified papers, necessitating the appointment of a third section editor to handle the increased workload. The editors narrowed the initial pool of articles to 15 candidate papers through a multi-stage selection process. At least seven independent reviews were collected for each candidate paper, and a selection meeting with the IMIA Yearbook editorial board led to the final selection of the best papers for the CIS section.

Results: The query was carried out in mid-January 2023 and retrieved a deduplicated result set of 5,206 articles from 1,500 journals. This year, 15 papers were nominated as candidates, and four were finally selected as the best papers in the CIS section.

Including telemedicine in the query resulted in a substantial increase in the number of papers found. The analysis highlights the growing convergence between clinical information systems and telemedicine, with mobile health (mHealth) technologies and data science applications gaining prominence. The selected candidate papers emphasize the practical impact of research efforts, focusing on patient-centric outcomes and benefits, including intelligent mobile health monitoring systems and AI-assisted decision-making in healthcare.

Conclusions: Looking ahead, the field of CIS is expected to continue evolving, driven by advances in telemedicine, mHealth technologies, data science, and AI integration, leading to more efficient, patient-oriented, and intelligent healthcare systems and overall improvement of global healthcare outcomes.

• Marke Headline and EXPLAIN IN EXPERT STATUS using EXPLAIN MODEL MODEL GPT-4 (costs 19 $ in addition)


• Use Explain COMPLETE PAPER using DETAILED SELECTION OF PAPER.


We present the unmodified original texts as supplied by the AI tool (only formatting was added afterwards).




Publication History

Article published online:
26 December 2023

© 2023. IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Ganslandt T, Hackl WO. Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective. Yearb Med Inform 2015 Aug 13;10(1):90–94. doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-037.
  • 2 Hackl WO, Ganslandt T. New Problems - New Solutions: A Never Ending Story. Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective for 2015. Yearb Med Inform 2016;(1):146–51. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-054.
  • 3 Hackl WO, Ganslandt T. Clinical Information Systems as the Backbone of a Complex Information Logistics Process: Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective for 2016. Yearb Med Inform 2017;26(1):103–9. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-023.
  • 4 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A. On the Way to Close the Loop in Information Logistics: Data from the Patient - Value for the Patient. Yearb Med Inform 2018;27(1):91–7. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667076.
  • 5 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A. Managing Complexity. From Documentation to Knowledge Integration and Informed Decision Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective for 2018. Yearb Med Inform 2019 Aug 16;28(01):95–100. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677919.
  • 6 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A. Clinical Information Systems Research in the Pandemic Year 2020. Yearb Med Inform 2021;30(1):134–40. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726516.
  • 7 Hackl WO, Hoerbst A. “All Quiet on the Western Front” - Clinical Information Systems Research in the Year 2021. Yearb Med Inform 2022 Dec 4;31(1):146–50. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742532.
  • 8 Hackl WO, Neururer SB, Pfeifer B. Telemedicine Research from Big Bang to 2022. Stud Health Technol Inform 2023 May 2;301:220–4. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230043.
  • 9 van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84(2):523–38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
  • 10 Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J Informetr 2010;4(4):629–35. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
  • 11 Guardiolle V, Bazoge A, Morin E, Daille B, Toublant D, Bouzillé G, et al. Linking Biomedical Data Warehouse Records with the National Mortality Database in France: Large-scale Matching Algorithm. JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(11). doi: 10.2196/36711.
  • 12 Zou Y, Pesaranghader A, Song Z, Verma A, Buckeridge DL, Li Y. Modeling electronic health record data using an end-to-end knowledge-graph-informed topic model. Sci Rep 2022 Dec 1;12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22956-w.
  • 13 Bialke M, Geidel L, Hampf C, Blumentritt A, Penndorf P, Schuldt R, et al. A FHIR has been lit on gICS: facilitating the standardised exchange of informed consent in a large network of university medicine. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02081-4.
  • 14 Chatterjee A, Pahari N, Prinz A. HL7 FHIR with SNOMED-CT to Achieve Semantic and Structural Interoperability in Personal Health Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Sensors 2022 May 1;22(10). doi: 10.3390/s22103756.
  • 15 Pylypchuk Y, Meyerhoefer CD, Encinosa W, Searcy T. The role of electronic health record developers in hospital patient sharing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Mar 1;29(3):435–42. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab263.
  • 16 Kryszyn J, Cywoniuk K, Smolik WT, Wanta D, Wróblewski P, Midura M. Performance of an openEHR based hospital information system. Int J Med Inform 2022 Jun 1;162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104757.
  • 17 Alenoghena CO, Onumanyi AJ, Ohize HO, Adejo AO, Oligbi M, Ali SI, et al. eHealth: A Survey of Architectures, Developments in mHealth, Security Concerns and Solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 Oct 1;19(20). doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013071.
  • 18 Li X, You K. Real-time tracking and detection of patient conditions in the intelligent m-Health monitoring system. Front Public Health 2022 Oct 10;10. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922718.
  • 19 Poelzl G, Egelseer-Bruendl T, Pfeifer B, Modre-Osprian R, Welte S, Fetz B, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of a multidimensional post-discharge disease management programme for heart failure patients in clinical practice: the HerzMobil Tirol programme. Clin Res Cardiol 2022 Mar 1;111(3):294–307. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01912-0.
  • 20 Graetz I, Huang J, Muelly ER, Hsueh L, Gopalan A, Reed ME. Video Telehealth Access and Changes in HbA1c Among People With Diabetes. Am J Prev Med 2022 May 1;62(5):782–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.10.012.
  • 21 Morcillo Serra C, Aroca Tanarro A, Cummings CM, Jimenez Fuertes A, Tomás Martínez JF. Impact on the reduction of CO2 emissions due to the use of telemedicine. Sci Rep 2022 Dec 1;12(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16864-2.
  • 22 Adams D V., Long S, Fleury ME. Association of Remote Technology Use and Other Decentralization Tools With Patient Likelihood to Enroll in Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5(7):E2220053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20053.
  • 23 Zhao M, Hamadi H, Xu J, Haley DR, Park S, White-Williams C. Telehealth and hospital performance: Does it matter? J Telemed Telecare 2022 Jun 1;28(5):360–70. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20932440.
  • 24 Hamberger M, Ikonomi N, Schwab JD, Werle SD, Fürstberger A, Kestler AMR, et al. Interaction Empowerment in Mobile Health: Concepts, Challenges, and Perspectives. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022 Apr 1;10(4). doi: 10.2196/32696.
  • 25 Humayun M, Jhanjhi NZ, Almotilag A, Almufareh MF. Agent-Based Medical Health Monitoring System. Sensors (Basel) 2022 Apr 1;22(8). doi: 10.3390/s22082820.
  • 26 Hah H, Goldin D. Moving toward AI-assisted decision-making: Observation on clinicians' management of multimedia patient information in synchronous and asynchronous telehealth contexts. Health Informatics J 2022 Feb 7;28(1). doi: 10.1177/14604582221077049.
  • 27 Magrabi F, Lyell D, Coiera E. Automation in contemporary clinical information systems: a survey of AI in healthcare settings. Yearb Med Inform 2023:115-26.