Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769619
The Reconstructive Toolbox
Funding None.

Abstract
Historically, the approach to any reconstructive challenge, whether intentionally or intuitively, can be seen to follow distinct guidelines that could aptly be called “reconstructive metaphors.” These have been intended to inform us as to the “what, “when” and “where” this attempt can best be achieved. Yet the “how” or means to accomplish this goal, usually also intuitively well understood, in a similar vein can now be expressed to be within our “reconstructive toolbox.” The latter will distinctly mirror our individuality and contain not only the various hardware that we deem essential, but also the means to access whatever technology we may be comfortable with. No toolbox, even if overflowing will ever be full, as potential options and the diversity they represent surely approaches infinity. But the truly excellent reconstructive surgeon will know when their toolbox is in any way lacking, and fears not remedying that deficiency even if the talents of another colleague must be sought, so as always to ensure that the patient will obtain the best appropriate treatment!
Keywords
reconstructive ladder - reconstructive elevator - reconstructive matrix - reconstructive toolboxAuthors' Contributions
G.G.H. is the only author and is in charge of every section of this manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 23 February 2023
Accepted: 25 April 2023
Article published online:
02 August 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Lineweaver WC. Problem analysis in reconstructive surgery: up and beyond the reconstructive ladders. In: Wei FC, and Mardini S. eds. Flaps and Reconstructive Surgery. Saunders: Elsevier; 2009: 3-6
- 2 Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (07) 1503-1504
- 3 Mardini S, Wei FC, Salgado CJ, Chen HC. Reconstruction of the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (07) 2174
- 4 Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive Surgery: Principles, Anatomy & Technique. Vol. 1. New York: : Churchill Livingstone; St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1997: 10-12
- 5 Erba P, Ogawa R, Vyas R, Orgill DP. The reconstructive matrix: a new paradigm in reconstructive plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (02) 492-498
- 6 Wong CJ, Niranjan N. Reconstructive stages as an alternative to the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (05) 362e-363e
- 7 Mohapatra DP, Thiruvoth FM. Reconstruction 2.0: restructuring the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147 (03) 572e-573e
- 8 Rozen SM. Facial reanimation: basic surgical tools and creation of an effective toolbox for treating patients with facial paralysis. Part A: functional muscle transfers in the long-term facial palsy patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 469-471
- 9 Nahabedian MY. ed. Toolbox for autologous breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2011; 38: xiii-xiv
- 10 Mormer E. What's in your teaching toolbox?. Semin Hear 2018; 39 (01) 107-114
- 11 Innocenti M. Back to the future: robotic microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (03) 287-288
- 12 Kamali P, Dean D, Skoracki R. et al. The current role of three-dimensional printing in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (03) 1045-1055
- 13 Chang EI, Boukovalas S, Liu J, Largo RD, Hanasono MM, Garvey PB. Reconstruction of posterior mandibulectomy defects in the modern era of virtual planning and three-dimensional modeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 453e-462e
- 14 Roh DS, Li EB, Liao EC. CRISPR craft: DNA editing the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (05) 1355-1364