PDF herunterladen
Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14(03): 544-554
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769924
Adolescent Privacy and the Electronic Health Record

Shifting into Action: from Data Segmentation to Equitable Interoperability for Adolescents (and Everyone Else)

Chethan Sarabu
1   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
,
Marianne Sharko
2   Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Division of Health Informatics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States
,
Carolyn Petersen
3   Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Hannah Galvin
4   Department of Information Technology, Cambridge Health Alliance, Tufts University School of Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
› Institutsangaben FundingShift Board member organizations (the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Electronic Health Records Association, Drummond Group, and the AARP) have all made financial contributions and/or donated services in kind to support Shift. These funds are administrated by the Cambridge Health Alliance, a nonprofit entity.
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Technological improvements and, subsequently, the federal 21st Century Cures Act have resulted in increased access to and interoperability of electronic protected health information (ePHI). These not only have many benefits, but also have created unique challenges for privacy and confidentiality for adolescent patients. The inability to granularly protect sensitive data and a lack of standards have resulted in limited confidentiality protection and inequitable access to health information.

Objectives This study aimed to understand the challenges to safe, equitable access, and interoperability of ePHI for adolescents and to identify strategies that have been developed, ongoing needs, and work in progress.

Methods Shift, a national task force formalized in 2020, is a group of more than 200 expert stakeholder members working to improve functionality to standardize efforts to granularly identify and protect sensitive ePHI to promote equitable interoperability.

Results Shift has created high-priority clinical use cases and organized challenges into the areas of Standards and Terminology; Usability and Implementation; and Ethics, Legal, and Policy.

Conclusion Current technical standards and value sets of terminology for sensitive data have been immature and inconsistent. Shift, a national diverse working group of stakeholders, is addressing challenges inherent in the protection of privacy and confidentiality for adolescent patients. The diversity of expertise and perspectives has been essential to identify and address these challenges.

Keywords

interoperability - privacy - confidentiality - standards - implementation - data segmentation - DS4P - adolescent

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human or animal subjects were involved in this work.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 17. Januar 2023

Angenommen: 19. April 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Juli 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Federal Register. 21st century cures act information blocking final rule. National Archives; 2020. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification
    PubMed
  • 2 Sinha S, Puttagunta R, Vodzak J. Interoperability and information-blocking rules: implications for pediatric and adolescent health care professionals. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175 (10) 997-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Morris JL, Rushwan H. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health: the global challenges. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131 (suppl 1) S40-S42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bearinger LH, Sieving RE, Ferguson J, Sharma V. Global perspectives on the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents: patterns, prevention, and potential. Lancet 2007; 369 (9568): 1220-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Alderman EM, Breuner CC. COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE. Unique needs of the adolescent. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (06) e20193150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jones RK, Purcell A, Singh S, Finer LB. Adolescents' reports of parental knowledge of adolescents' use of sexual health services and their reactions to mandated parental notification for prescription contraception. JAMA 2005; 293 (03) 340-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lindberg C, Lewis-Spruill C, Crownover R. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: urban male adolescents speak out. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2006; 29 (02) 73-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Klein JD, Wilson KM. Delivering quality care: adolescents' discussion of health risks with their providers. J Adolesc Health 2002; 30 (03) 190-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Klein JD, McNulty M, Flatau CN. Adolescents' access to care: teenagers' self-reported use of services and perceived access to confidential care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152 (07) 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reddy DM, Fleming R, Swain C. Effect of mandatory parental notification on adolescent girls' use of sexual health care services. JAMA 2002; 288 (06) 710-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ginsburg KR, Slap GB, Cnaan A, Forke CM, Balsley CM, Rouselle DM. Adolescents' perceptions of factors affecting their decisions to seek health care. JAMA 1995; 273 (24) 1913-1918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moreno MA, Ralston JD, Grossman DC. Adolescent access to online health services: perils and promise. J Adolesc Health 2009; 44 (03) 244-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D. et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (12) e275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stablein T, Loud KJ, DiCapua C, Anthony DL. The catch to confidentiality: the use of electronic health records in adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health 2018; 62 (05) 577-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Summers D, Alpert I, Rousseau-Pierre T. et al. An exploration of the ethical, legal and developmental issues in the care of an adolescent patient. Mt Sinai J Med 2006; 73 (03) 592-595
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Williams RL, Taylor JF. Four steps to preserving adolescent confidentiality in an electronic health environment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 28 (05) 393-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wisk LE, Gray SH, Gooding HC. I thought you said this was confidential? Challenges to protecting privacy for teens and young adults. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172 (03) 209-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bourgeois FC, Nigrin DJ, Harper MB. Preserving patient privacy and confidentiality in the era of personal health records. Pediatrics 2015; 135 (05) e1125 –e1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Spear SJ, English A. Protecting confidentiality to safeguard adolescents' health: finding common ground. Contraception 2007; 76 (02) 73-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gray SH, Pasternak RH, Gooding HC. et al; Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Recommendations for electronic health record use for delivery of adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health 2014; 54 (04) 487-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Anoshiravani A, Gaskin GL, Groshek MR, Kuelbs C, Longhurst CA. Special requirements for electronic medical records in adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health 2012; 51 (05) 409-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Spooner SA. Council on Clinical Information Technology, American Academy of Pediatrics. Special requirements of electronic health record systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (03) 631-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Blythe MJ, Del Beccaro MA. Committee on Adolescence; Council on Clinical and Information Technology. Standards for health information technology to ensure adolescent privacy. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (05) 987-990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Diaz A, Neal WP, Nucci AT, Ludmer P, Bitterman J, Edwards S. Legal and ethical issues facing adolescent health care professionals. Mt Sinai J Med 2004; 71 (03) 181-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bourgeois FC, DesRoches CM, Bell SK. Ethical Challenges Raised by OpenNotes for Pediatric and Adolescent Patients. Pediatrics 2018; 141 (06) e20172745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hutchinson JW, Stafford EM. Changing parental opinions about teen privacy through education. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (04) 966-971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ancker JS, Sharko M, Hong M, Mitchell H, Wilcox L. Should parents see their teen's medical record? Asking about the effect on adolescent-doctor communication changes attitudes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (12) 1593-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kleiner KD, Akers R, Burke BL, Werner EJ. Parent and physician attitudes regarding electronic communication in pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2002; 109 (05) 740-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gaskin GL, Bruce J, Anoshiravani A. Understanding parent perspectives concerning adolescents' online access to personal health information. J Particip Med 2016; 8: e3
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vodicka E, Mejilla R, Leveille SG. et al. Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (09) e208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Steitz B, Cronin RM, Davis SE, Yan E, Jackson GP. Long-term patterns of patient portal use for pediatric patients at an academic medical center. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (03) 779-793
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ip W, Yang S, Parker J. et al. Assessment of prevalence of adolescent patient portal account access by guardians. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (09) e2124733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sharko M, Wilcox L, Hong MK, Ancker JS. Variability in adolescent portal privacy features: how the unique privacy needs of the adolescent patient create a complex decision-making process. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (08) 1008-1017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Parsons CR. Inappropriate access to the adolescent patient portal and low rates of proxy account creation. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (09) e2125251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bergman DA, Brown NL, Wilson S. Teen use of a patient portal: a qualitative study of parent and teen attitudes. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2008; 5: 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jasik CB. Unlocking the potential of the patient portal for adolescent health. J Adolesc Health 2016; 58 (02) 123-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Byczkowski TL, Munafo JK, Britto MT. Variation in use of internet-based patient portals by parents of children with chronic disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165 (05) 405-411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sharko M, Jameson R, Ancker JS, Krams L, Webber EC, Rosenbloom ST. State-by-state variability in adolescent privacy laws. Pediatrics 2022; 149 (06) e2021053458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Xie J, McPherson T, Powell A. et al. Ensuring adolescent patient portal confidentiality in the age of the cures act final rule. J Adolesc Health 2021; 69 (06) 933-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Khanna RR, Murray SG, Wen T. et al. Protecting reproductive health information in the post-Roe era: interoperability strategies for healthcare institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 161-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Clayton EW, Embí PJ, Malin BA. Dobbs and the future of health data privacy for patients and healthcare organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 155-160
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Nayak MM, Revette A, Chai PR. et al. Medical cannabis-related stigma: cancer survivors' perspectives. J Cancer Surviv 2022; DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01297-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Moreno A, Laoch A, Zasler ND. Changing the culture of neurodisability through language and sensitivity of providers: Creating a safe place for LGBTQIA+ people. . NeuroRehabilitation 2017; 41 (02) 375-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kolb K, Liu J, Jackman K. Stigma towards patients with mental illness: An online survey of United States nurses. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32 (01) 323-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Schwarzlose RF. Superiority and stigma in modern psychology and neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci 2023; 27 (01) 4-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Soled KRS, Dimant OE, Tanguay J, Mukerjee R, Poteat T. Interdisciplinary clinicians' attitudes, challenges, and success strategies in providing care to transgender people: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22 (01) 1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Healy M, Richard A, Kidia K. How to reduce stigma and bias in clinical communication: a narrative review. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37 (10) 2533-2540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Supreme Court of the United States. . Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Supreme Court of the United States; 2022. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: opinions 21pdf 19–1392_6j37.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov
    PubMed
  • 49 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. . What Is Information Blocking and to Whom Does It Apply? Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Accessed May 30, 2023 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/information-blocking#:~:text=What%20Is%20Information%20Blocking%20and,in%20an%20information%20blocking%20exception
  • 50 Ford CA, Bourgeois F, Buckelew SM. et al. Twenty-first century cures act final rule and adolescent health care: Leadership Education in Adolescent Health (LEAH) Program experiences. J Adolesc Health 2021; 69 (06) 873-877
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Carlson J, Goldstein R, Hoover K, Tyson N. NASPAG/SAHM Statement: The 21st Century Cures Act and Adolescent Confidentiality. J Adolesc Health 2021; 68 (02) 426-428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.10.020.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pageler NM, Webber EC, Lund DP. Implications of the 21st Century Cures Act in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2021; 147 (03) e2020034199 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-034199.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 HL7. . HL7 Implementation Guide: Data Segmentation for Privacy (DS4P 14. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=354
    PubMed
  • 54 Bedgood M, Kuelbs CL, Jones VG, Pageler N. Organizational perspectives on technical capabilities and barriers related to pediatric data sharing and confidentiality. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5 (07) e2219692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 San Diego Health Connect. . ONC LEAP Computable Consent Project. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://sdhealthconnect.github.io/leap/
    PubMed
  • 56 Stewards of Change Institute. . Modernizing consent to advance health and equity: a national survey of key technologies, legal issues and promising practices. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://stewardsofchange.org/13479-2/
    PubMed
  • 57 Open ID. . What is the heart WG ? Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://openid.net/wg/heart/
    PubMed
  • 58 The Gravity Project. . The gravity project website; 2022. Accessed December 14, 2022 at: https://thegravityproject.net/overview/
    PubMed
  • 59 Xie J, Hogan A, McPherson T, Pageler N, Lee TC, Carlson J. Adolescent privacy and the electronic health record - creating a guardrail system to ensure appropriate activation of adolescent portal accounts. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (02) 258-268
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar