Anterior Skull Base Outcomes and Complications: A Propensity Score–Matched Evaluation of Age and Frailty as Measured by mFI-5 from the ACS-NSQIP Database

Abstract

Background Frailty is increasingly recognized as a predictor of surgical outcomes; however, its utility in anterior cranial fossa (ACF) surgery remains unclear. We analyzed whether age and frailty are independent predictors of outcomes after ACF surgery using a retrospective cohort study.

Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried, by Current Procedural Terminology codes, for ACF procedures in 2005 to 2020. Cases included open approaches, endoscopic approaches, and all tumor types except for pituitary adenoma. A propensity score–matched data set was analyzed via multiple logistic regression.

Results Unmatched multivariate analysis of ACF cases demonstrated that severe frailty (modified 5-item frailty index [mFI-5] ≥ 3) was independently associated with having any (odds ratio [OR] = 3.67) and minor (OR = 5.00) complications (both p < 0.001). Analysis of individual mFI-5 components demonstrated poor functional status was significantly associated with any (OR = 3.39), major (OR = 3.59), and minor (OR = 3.14) complications (all p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, only age was modestly impactful on minor complications (OR = 1.02) and extended length of stay (eLOS) (OR = 1.02) (p < 0.001). Frailty did not maintain its predictive ability after matching. Nonindependent functional status, as a subcomponent of mFI maintained significant predictive ability for any (OR = 4.94), major (OR = 4.68), and minor (OR = 4.80) complications and eLOS (OR = 2.92) (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion After propensity score matching, age demonstrated a greater ability to predict postoperative complications in ACF surgery than frailty. Rather than age or frailty, functional status served as a better outcome predictor and potential guide for patient counseling. Further validation of these findings in multicenter or disease-specific studies is warranted as well as aims to preoperatively improve functional status in ACF surgery.

Keywords

age - anterior cranial fossa - anterior skull base - complications - frailty - mFI-5 - modified 5-item frailty index - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - neurosurgery - NSQIP - propensity score matching

Publication History

Article published online:
10 July 2023

• References

• 1 Horowitz PM, DiNapoli V, Su SY, Raza SM. Complication avoidance in endoscopic skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016; 49 (01) 227-235
• 2 Wagenmann M, Scheckenbach K, Kraus B, Stenin I. Complications of anterior skull base surgery [in German]. HNO 2018; 66 (06) 438-446
• 3 Deschler DG, Gutin PH, Mamelak AN, McDermott MW, Kaplan MJ. Complications of anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 1996; 6 (02) 113-118
• 4 Kuan EC, Badran KW, Yoo F. et al. Predictors of short-term morbidity and mortality in open anterior skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (06) 1407-1412
• 5 Almeida JP, de Albuquerque LA, Dal Fabbro M. et al. Endoscopic skull base surgery: evaluation of current clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Sci 2019; 63 (01) 88-95
• 6 Rezende GL, Neto ORM, Kückelhaus SAS. Morbidity in the postoperative follow-up of endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2021; 87 (06) 689-694
• 7 Güldner C, Zimmermann AP, Diogo I, Werner JA, Teymoortash A. Age-dependent differences of the anterior skull base. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (06) 822-828
• 8 Lawrence LA, Baker AB, Nguyen SA, Karnezis TT, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. Predictors of 30-day morbidity and mortality in transnasal microscopic pituitary tumor excision. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2016; 6 (02) 206-213
• 9 Przybylowski CJ, Shaftel KA, Hendricks BK. et al. Perioperative complication profile of skull base meningioma resection in older versus younger adult patients. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83 (04) 411-417
• 10 Rizvi ZH, Ferrandino R, Luu Q, Suh JD, Wang MB. Nationwide analysis of unplanned 30-day readmissions after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (03) 322-329
• 11 Boling CC, Karnezis TT, Baker AB. et al. Multi-institutional study of risk factors for perioperative morbidity following transnasal endoscopic pituitary adenoma surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2016; 6 (01) 101-107
• 12 Hunsaker J, Khan M, Makarenko S, Evans J, Couldwell W, Karsy M. Prediction of readmission and complications after pituitary adenoma resection via the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Cureus 2021; 13 (05) e14809
• 13 Leven DM, Lee NJ, Kim JS. et al. Frailty is predictive of adverse postoperative events in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. Global Spine J 2017; 7 (06) 529-535
• 14 Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226 (02) 173-181.e8
• 15 Henry RK, Reeves RA, Wackym PA, Ahmed OH, Hanft SJ, Kwong KM. Frailty as a predictor of postoperative complications following skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2021; 131 (09) 1977-1984
• 16 Goshtasbi K, Abiri A, Lehrich BM. et al. Association between modified frailty index and surgical outcomes in intradural skull base surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 91: 255-259
• 17 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File. 2022 . Accessed February 16, 2022 at: http://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/participant-use
• 18 Khuri SF. The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 2005; 138 (05) 837-843
• 19 Castle-Kirszbaum M, Wang YY, King J, Goldschlager T. Frailty does not preclude surgical success after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2021; 24 (06) 922-929
• 20 Nguyen S, Kim RB, Cox P. et al. Impact of modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11) on postoperative complications in patients undergoing transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumors: analysis of 2006-2014 ACS-NSQIP database. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 92: 22-26
• 21 Harland TA, Wang M, Gunaydin D. et al. Frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes in brain tumor patients. World Neurosurg 2020; 133: e813-e818
• 22 Kolakshyapati M, Ikawa F, Abiko M. et al; Alumni Association Group of the Department of Neurosurgery at Hiroshima University. Multivariate risk factor analysis and literature review of postoperative deterioration in Karnofsky Performance Scale score in elderly patients with skull base meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 44 (04) E14
• 23 Tang OY, Bajaj AI, Zhao K. et al. Association of patient frailty with vestibular schwannoma resection outcomes and machine learning development of a vestibular schwannoma risk stratification score. Neurosurgery 2022; 91 (02) 312-321
• 24 Shahrestani S, Brown NJ, Nasrollahi TS. et al. Evaluating the predictive value of comorbidity indices in pituitary surgery: a mixed-effects modeling study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database. J Neurosurg 2022; •••: 1-9
• 25 Shah JP, Kraus DH, Bilsky MH, Gutin PH, Harrison LH, Strong EW. Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (12) 1312-1317