Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770933
Research Status and Future Trends of Angioplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace
Funding and Sponsorship The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Abstract
Introduction Angioplasty, with or without stenting, is a nonsurgical procedure to open blocked or narrowed coronary arteries due to underlying atherosclerosis. While there is ample literature on coronary heart disease research, the literature search found no bibliographic studies that quantified angioplasty studies. This study was initiated using bibliometric analysis to identify trends in angioplasty over the past twenty years.
Methods The study data was searched from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The study data included 11,429 studies published between 2001 and 2021 downloaded from the WoSCC. CiteSpace V.5.8.was used to analyze the intellectual structure and identify upcoming patterns.
Results Over the last two decades, the number of publications in this discipline has decreased. Data from 2021 did not exceed (414) and fell by half compared with 2001 (805). The keyword analysis showed that “coronary angioplasty” recorded the strongest citation burst 26.59 for the years 2001 to 2005. For the most recent data from 2018 to 2021, the strongest citation burst was recorded for the keyword “outcome” (25.64).
Conclusion This study was an exploratory attempt to identify trends in angioplasty research over the past two decades to deliver relatively unbiased and complete data on the scientific activity performed by authors worldwide. The number and percentage of published articles gradually decrease over time, which is a new finding, highlighting the need for further study of angioplasty, in particular why the trends have decreased over time.
Keywords
angioplasty - endoluminal repair - percutaneous transluminal angioplasty - bibliometric analysis - trendsAuthors' Contributions
M.I. was involved in conceptualization, methodology, and software; A.W. contributed to data curation, visualization, writing-reviewing and editing; M.R. was involved in writing–original draft preparation, visualization, and investigation; S.A. contributed to supervision, methodology, software, and validation
Compliance with Ethical Principles
An ethics statement is not applicable because this study is based on published literature.
Availability of Data and Material
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Publication History
Article published online:
20 July 2023
© 2023. The Libyan Biotechnology Research Center. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Farley A, McLafferty E, Hendry C. The cardiovascular system. Nurs Stand 2012; 27 (09) 35-39
- 2 World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases. Accessed June 18, 2023 at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1 2022
- 3 National Health Service. Cardiovascular diseases. Accessed June 18, 2023 at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cardiovascular-disease/ 2022
- 4 Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA. et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56 (25) e50-e103
- 5 Olvera Lopez E, Ballard BD, Jan A. Cardiovascular Disease. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; ; August 8, 2022. Accessed September 10, 2022 at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30571040/
- 6 The Johns Hopkins Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine. Cardiovascular Disease Research. Accessed June 18, 2023 at: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/gim/research/content/cvd.html 2022
- 7 Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D. et al; American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010; 121 (04) 586-613
- 8 Chhabra L, Zain MA, Siddiqui WJ. Angioplasty. In:StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; ; May 22, 2022. Accessed September 10, 2022 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499894/
- 9 Malik TF, Tivakaran VS. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. In:StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; ; May 16, 2022
- 10 Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS. et al. Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10 (09) 874-881
- 11 Wang Z, Xia J, Wang W. et al. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for cerebral angiography: a prospective comparison [published correction appears. J Interv Med 2021; 4 (01) 54-55
- 12 Ebell MH. Estimating the risks of coronary angioplasty. Fam Pract Manag 2004; 11 (10) 71-72
- 13 Campbell M, Torrance C. Coronary angioplasty: impact on risk factors and patients' understanding of the severity of their condition. Aust J Adv Nurs 2005; 22 (04) 26-31
- 14 Rosas SR, Kagan JM, Schouten JT, Slack PA, Trochim WM. Evaluating research and impact: a bibliometric analysis of research by the NIH/NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks. PLoS One 2011; 6 (03) e17428
- 15 Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics 2015; 105 (03) 1809-1831
- 16 Price DJ. Networks of scientific papers. Science 1965; 149 (3683): 510-515
- 17 Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH. et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 1999; 100 (09) 1016-1030
- 18 Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361 (9351): 13-20
- 19 Suiter AM, Sarli CC. Selecting a journal for publication: criteria to consider. Mo Med 2019; 116 (06) 461-465
- 20 Stone CW. Translational Medicine Academy. Accessed June 18, 2023 at: https://www.tmacademy.org/hfgf-digital-forum-8th-edition/gregg-stone/
- 21 Stone CW. Cardiometabolic Health Congress. Accessed June 18, 2023 at: https://www.cardiometabolichealth.org/faculty/gregg-w-stone/ 2022