Clin Colon Rectal Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941
Review Article

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

1   Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
1   Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 μm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well–moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.



Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. August 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1965-1977
  • 2 Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1978-1998
  • 3 Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Steele S. Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (07) 3114-3121
  • 4 Vu JV, Sheetz KH, De Roo AC, Hiatt T, Hendren S. Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (02) 802-808
  • 5 Bronzwaer MES, Koens L, Bemelman WA, Dekker E, Fockens P. COPOS study group. Volume of surgery for benign colorectal polyps in the last 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87 (02) 552-561.e1
  • 6 Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD. et al. Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018; 154 (05) 1352-1360.e3
  • 7 Gorgun E, Benlice C, Church JM. Does cancer risk in colonic polyps unsuitable for polypectomy support the need for advanced endoscopic resections?. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223 (03) 478-484
  • 8 Peery AF, Shaheen NJ, Cools KS. et al. Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87 (01) 243-250.e2
  • 9 Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, Steele S, Gorgun E. Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: a case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery 2018; 163 (03) 522-527
  • 10 Yamamoto H, Yube T, Isoda N. et al. A novel method of endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50 (02) 251-256
  • 11 Shirai M, Nakamura T, Matsuura A, Ito Y, Kobayashi S. Safer colonoscopic polypectomy with local submucosal injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine solution. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89 (03) 334-338
  • 12 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al. Successful en-bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Endoscopy 2003; 35 (08) 690-694
  • 13 Patel N, Patel K, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Teare J. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes. Dig Endosc 2016; 28 (04) 405-416
  • 14 Puli SR, Kakugawa Y, Saito Y, Antillon D, Gotoda T, Antillon MR. Successful complete cure en-bloc resection of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps by endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (08) 2147-2151
  • 15 Church JM. Avoiding surgery in patients with colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (11) 1513-1516
  • 16 Fung TLD, Chow CWS, Chan PT, Kwok KH. Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (09) 3766-3787
  • 17 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 158 (04) 1095-1129
  • 18 Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y. et al; Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25 (01) 1-42
  • 19 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline - update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54 (06) 591-622
  • 20 Muramoto T, Ohata K, Sakai E. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in proximity or extending to a diverticulum. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (07) 3479-3487
  • 21 Benlice C, Gorgun E. Endoscopic mucosal dissection. In: Lee S, Ross HM, Rivadeneira D, Steele SR, Feingold D. eds. Advanced Colonoscopy and Endoluminal Surgery. Springer International Publishing Cham, Switzerland; 2017: 159-168
  • 22 Kudo S, Kashida H, Nakajima T, Tamura S, Nakajo K. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 1997; 21 (07) 694-701
  • 23 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58 (6, suppl): S3-S43
  • 24 Hayashi N, Tanaka S, Hewett DG. et al. Endoscopic prediction of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma: validation of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78 (04) 625-632
  • 25 Fuccio L, Ponchon T. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31 (04) 473-480
  • 26 Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T. Colorectal ESD: current indications and latest technical advances. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24 (02) 245-255
  • 27 Sapci I, Gorgun E. Advanced colonic polypectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2020; 100 (06) 1079-1089
  • 28 Tatar C, Ozgur I, Sapci I. , et al. Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Colorectal Lesions Performed In The Endoscopy Suite Safe And Cost Saving? Poster presented at: Digestive Disease Week (DDW); May 23, 2022; San Diego, CA
  • 29 Kumar AS, Kelleher DC, Sigle GW. Bowel preparation before elective surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2013; 26 (03) 146-152
  • 30 Bretthauer M, Lynge AB, Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G, Fausa O, Aabakken L. Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2005; 37 (08) 706-709
  • 31 Kandel P, Wallace MB. Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31 (04) 455-471
  • 32 Saito Y, Sylvia Wu SY, Ego M, Abe S. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with use of a bipolar and insulated tip knife. VideoGIE 2019; 4 (07) 314-318
  • 33 Zhang M, Shin EJ. Successful endoscopic strategies for difficult polypectomy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2013; 29 (05) 489-894
  • 34 Uno Y, Munakata A. The non-lifting sign of invasive colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40 (04) 485-489
  • 35 Dumoulin FL, Hildenbrand R. Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: current developments. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25 (03) 300-307
  • 36 Ito A, Suga T, Ota H, Tateiwa N, Matsumoto A, Tanaka E. Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 2018; 53 (11) 1171-1178
  • 37 Inoue H, Endo M. Endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a transparent tube. Surg Endosc 1990; 4 (04) 198-201
  • 38 Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J, Bhat Y, Kane S. “Underwater” EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75 (05) 1086-1091
  • 39 Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 2008; 43 (09) 641-651
  • 40 Dumoulin FL, Sido B, Bollmann R, Sauer M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in colorectal tumors. Viszeralmedizin 2014; 30 (01) 39-44
  • 41 Abe S, Wu SYS, Ego M. et al. Efficacy of current traction techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 2020; 14 (06) 673-684
  • 42 Hayashi Y, Sunada K, Takahashi H. et al. Pocket-creation method of endoscopic submucosal dissection to achieve en bloc resection of giant colorectal subpedunculated neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 2014; 46 (1, suppl 1 UCTN): E421-E422
  • 43 Gong J, Chen T, Tan Y, Liu D. Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33 (10) 1241-1246
  • 44 Toyonaga T, Man-I M, Morita Y, Azuma T. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus simplified/hybrid ESD. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24 (02) 191-199
  • 45 McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Thompson CC, Aihara H. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with conventional ESD for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53 (10) 1048-1058
  • 46 Keihanian T, Othman MO. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: an update on best practice. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14: 317-330
  • 47 Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y. et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32 (02) 219-239
  • 48 Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T. et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81 (03) 583-595
  • 49 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H. et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc 2010; 22 (04) 376-380
  • 50 Kataoka Y, Tsuji Y, Sakaguchi Y. et al. Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: risk factors and preventive methods. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (26) 5927-5935
  • 51 Kim ER, Chang DK. Management of complications of colorectal submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc 2019; 52 (02) 114-119
  • 52 Alsowaina KN, Ahmed MA, Alkhamesi NA. et al. Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (12) 3889-3898
  • 53 Hassan MA, Thomsen CØ, Vilmann P. Endoscopic treatment of colorectal perforations–a systematic review. Dan Med J 2016; 63 (04) A5220
  • 54 Bartell N, Bittner K, Kaul V, Kothari TH, Kothari S. Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26 (24) 3495-3516
  • 55 Ozgur I, Yilmaz S, Bhatt A, Holubar SD, Steele SR, Gorgun E. Endoluminal management of colon perforations during advanced endoscopic procedures. Surgery 2023; 173 (03) 687-692
  • 56 Kim JS, Kim BW, Kim JI. et al. Endoscopic clip closure versus surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colon perforations developed during diagnostic colonoscopy: a review of 115,285 patients. Surg Endosc 2013; 27 (02) 501-504
  • 57 Martínez-Pérez A, de'Angelis N, Brunetti F. et al. Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg 2017; 12: 8
  • 58 Hayashi T, Kudo SE, Miyachi H. et al. Management and risk factor of stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86 (02) 358-369
  • 59 Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20 (25) 8282-8287
  • 60 De Ceglie A, Hassan C, Mangiavillano B. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 104: 138-155
  • 61 Imai K, Hotta K, Yamaguchi Y, Ito S, Ono H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2017; 29 (Suppl. 02) 53-57
  • 62 Ortiz AM, Bhargavi P, Zuckerman MJ, Othman MO. Endoscopic mucosal resection recurrence rate for colorectal lesions. South Med J 2014; 107 (10) 615-621
  • 63 Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46 (05) 388-402
  • 64 Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's esophagus and colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17 (06) 1019-1028
  • 65 Choi JY, Jung SA, Shim KN. et al; Korean ESD Study Group. Meta-analysis of predictive clinicopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with early colorectal carcinoma. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30 (04) 398-406
  • 66 Yilmaz S, Ozgur I, Feinberg A, Catalano B, Steele SR, Gorgun E. . Perforation during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colorectal Cancer: Are Oncological Outcomes Impacted? Paper presented at: Midwest Surgical Association Annual Meeting; August 8, 2022; Mackinaw Island, MI
  • 67 Overwater A, Kessels K, Elias SG. et al; Dutch T1 CRC Working Group. Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut 2018; 67 (02) 284-290
  • 68 Yamashita K, Oka S, Tanaka S. et al. Preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma does not affect the prognosis of patients who underwent additional surgery: a large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastroenterol 2019; 54 (10) 897-906