Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Polyps

Abstract

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) can be utilized to manage a wide variety of rectal lesions but can be technically demanding with traditional laparoscopic equipment. Robotic platforms such as the da Vinci Single Port system can reduce the technical barriers of TAMIS and allow more complicated lesions to be addressed. Robotic TAMIS with the SP system follows similar indications for local excision of benign and malignant lesions as conventional TAMIS or even transanal endoscopic microsurgery. We describe our initial experience using the SP system and provide technical suggestions for how to incorporate this technology. We also address innovations in flexible endoscopic robotic surgery that we anticipate will allow for increased use of organ preservation of the colon and rectum, as well as possibly expand the use of natural orifice surgery.

Keywords

TAMIS - endoluminal surgery - rectal polyp - TEM - robotic surgical platforms

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. August 2023

• References

• 1 Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 2010; 24 (09) 2200-2205
• 2 Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Böbel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H. [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation]. Chirurg 1984; 55 (10) 677-680
• 3 Lee L, Edwards K, Hunter IA. et al. Quality of local excision for rectal neoplasms using transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus transanal minimally invasive surgery: a multi-institutional matched analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (09) 928-935
• 4 Lee SG, Russ AJ, Casillas Jr MA. Laparoscopic transanal minimally invasive surgery (L-TAMIS) versus robotic TAMIS (R-TAMIS): short-term outcomes and costs of a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (06) 1981-1987
• 5 Liu S, Suzuki T, Murray BW. et al. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with the newest robotic surgical platform: a multi-institutional North American experience. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (02) 543-548
• 6 Marks JH, Kunkel E, Salem JF, Martin C, Anderson B, Agarwal S. First clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (SP rTAMIS) for benign rectal neoplasms. Tech Coloproctol 2021; 25 (01) 117-124
• 7 Tomassi MJ, Taller J, Yuhan R, Ruan JH, Klaristenfeld DD. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for the excision of rectal neoplasia: clinical experience with 58 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62 (03) 279-285
• 8 You YN, Hardiman KM, Bafford A. et al; On Behalf of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (09) 1191-1222
• 9 Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Karimuddin AA. The surgical defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed management. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (03) 1078-1082
• 10 Noura S, Ohue M, Miyoshi N, Yasui M. Significance of defect closure following transanal local full-thickness excision of rectal malignant tumors. Mol Clin Oncol 2016; 5 (04) 449-454
• 11 Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, Dindo D, Rega D, Delrio P. Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed?. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 (05) 397-402
• 12 Atallah S, Parra-Davila E, DeBeche-Adams T, Albert M, Larach S. Excision of a rectal neoplasm using robotic transanal surgery (RTS): a description of the technique. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16 (05) 389-392
• 13 Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Chow OS. et al. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (15) 1537-1546
• 14 Sanchez JE, Marcet JE. Colorectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and transvaginal/transrectal specimen extraction. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17 (Suppl. 01) S69-S73
• 15 Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Steele S. Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (07) 3114-3121
• 16 Lightner AL, Vaidya P, Allende D, Gorgun E. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is safe and feasible, allowing for ongoing surveillance and organ preservation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23 (08) 2100-2107
• 17 Yang D, Draganov PV. Gaining traction: pulley-ing your weight during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89 (01) 185-187
• 18 Yang D, Jawaid S, Perbtani YB, Draganov PV. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large rectal lesion by use of a novel tissue retractor system. VideoGIE 2018; 4 (01) 37-39
• 19 Carmichael H, D'Andrea AP, Skancke M, Obias V, Sylla P. Feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using the Medrobotics Flex® System. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (01) 485-491
• 20 Høgh A, Deding U, Bjørsum-Meyer T, Buch N, Baatrup G. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) in colon and rectum: indications and outcomes in the first 37 cases in a single center. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (11) 8195-8201
• 21 McKechnie T, Govind S, Lee J, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2022; 280: 440-449