Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2023; 18(01): e27-e31
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771012
Original Article

Impact of Preoperative Neuropraxia on Surgical Duration Following Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture of the Humerus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Yazeed Alayed 
1   Department of Pediatrics, Children Hospital, King Saud Medical City, Ulaishah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Bander S. Alrashedan
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Ulaishah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Sultan K. Almisfer
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Ulaishah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
,
Ali M. Aldossari
3   Division of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Saud Medical City, Ulaishah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations Funding This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCFHs) are the most common type of elbow fracture in children. Because of the influence on functional outcome, neuropraxia is one of the most common concerns at presentation. The impact of preoperative neuropraxia on surgery duration is not extensively probed. The clinical implications of several other risk factors associated with preoperative neuropraxia at presentation may contribute to longer surgical duration of SCFH.

Hypothesis Preoperative neuropraxia is likely to increase surgery duration in patients who sustained SCFH.

Patients and Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis. Sixty-six patients who sustained surgical pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture were included in the study. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, the type of fracture according to Gartland classification, mechanism of injury, patient weight, side of injury, and associated nerve injury were included in the study. Logistic regression analysis was performed using mean surgery duration as the main dependent variable and age, gender, fracture type according to the mechanism of injury, Gartland classification, injured arm, vascular status, time from presentation to surgery, weight, type of surgery, medial K-wire use, and afterhours surgery as the independent variables. A follow-up of 1 year was implemented.

Result The overall preoperative neuropraxia rate was 9.1%. The mean surgery duration was 57.6 ± 5.6 minutes. The mean duration of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning surgeries was 48.5 ± 5.3 minutes, whereas the mean duration of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) surgeries was 129.3 ± 15.1 minutes. Preoperative neuropraxia was associated with an overall increase in the surgery duration (p < 0.017). Bivariate binary regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the increase of surgery duration and flexion-type fracture (odds ratio = 11, p < 0.038) as well as ORIF (odds ratio = 26.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion Preoperative neuropraxia and flexion-type fractures convey a potential longer surgical duration in pediatric supracondylar fracture.

Level of Evidence Prognostic III.

Keywords

child - supracondylar humeral fractures - recovery of function - prognosis - K-wires

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. IRB [H1RE-22-Dec20–01] granted from the Institutional Review Board in King Saud Medical City, Riyad, Saudi Arabia. IRB registration number with KACST, KSA: H-01-R-053. IRB registration number U.S. Department of HHS IORG: IORG0010374.


Informed Consent

Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board committee due to the nature of the study.




Publication History

Received: 14 May 2023

Accepted: 05 June 2023

Article published online:
03 July 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Seeley MA, Gagnier JJ, Srinivasan RC. et al. Obesity and its effects on pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (03) e18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Joiner ERA, Skaggs DL, Arkader A. et al. Iatrogenic nerve injuries in the treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures: are we really just missing nerve injuries on preoperative examination?. J Pediatr Orthop 2014; 34 (04) 388-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (05) 1121-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Otsuka NY, Kasser JR. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997; 5 (01) 19-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Li YA, Lee PC, Chia WT. et al. Prospective analysis of a new minimally invasive technique for paediatric Gartland type III supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Injury 2009; 40 (12) 1302-1307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Guner S, Guven N, Karadas S. et al. Iatrogenic or fracture-related nerve injuries in supracondylar humerus fracture: is treatment necessary for nerve injury?. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013; 17 (06) 815-819
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1959; 109 (02) 145-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alton TB, Werner SE, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: the Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (02) 738-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Biso G, Munakomi S. Neuroanatomy, Neurapraxia. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kouyoumdjian JA, Graça CR, Ferreira VFM. Peripheral nerve injuries: a retrospective survey of 1124 cases. Neurol India 2017; 65 (03) 551-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Azzolin L, Angelliaume A, Harper L, Lalioui A, Delgove A, Lefèvre Y. Optimal postoperative immobilisation for supracondylar humeral fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (05) 645-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Shore BJ, Gillespie BT, Miller PE, Bae DS, Waters PM. Recovery of motor nerve injuries associated with displaced, extension-type pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2019; 39 (09) e652-e656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peña-Martínez V, Tamez-Mata Y, García-Limón M. et al. Supracondylar humeral fractures and lateral elbow condyle fractures in children: association between body weight, clinical signs, and fracture severity. Minerva Pediatr 2020
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 DeFrancesco CJ, Shah AS, Brusalis CM, Flynn K, Leddy K, Flynn JM. Rate of open reduction for supracondylar humerus fractures varies across pediatric orthopaedic surgeons: a single-institution analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (10) e400-e407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Vaquero-Picado A, González-Morán G, Moraleda L. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. EFORT Open Rev 2018; 3 (10) 526-540
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Paci GM, Tileston KR, Vorhies JS, Bishop JA. Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: does after-hours treatment influence outcomes?. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (06) e215-e220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Loizou CL, Simillis C, Hutchinson JR. A systematic review of early versus delayed treatment for type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children. Injury 2009; 40 (03) 245-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vincelet Y, Journeau P, Popkov D, Haumont T, Lascombes P. The anatomical basis for anterior interosseous nerve palsy secondary to supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99 (05) 543-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sun LJ, Wu ZP, Yang J. et al. Factors associated with a failed closed reduction for supracondylar fractures in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (06) 621-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Soldado F, Hodgson F, Barrera-Ochoa S. et al. Gartland type-IV supracondylar humeral fractures: preoperative radiographic features and a hypothesis on causation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108 (01) 103049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pesenti S, Ecalle A, Gaubert L. et al. Operative management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children: comparison of five fixation methods. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (05) 771-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chukwunyerenwa C, Orlik B, El-Hawary R, Logan K, Howard JJ. Treatment of flexion-type supracondylar fractures in children: the ‘push-pull’ method for closed reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation. J Pediatr Orthop B 2016; 25 (05) 412-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Leet AI, Frisancho J, Ebramzadeh E. Delayed treatment of type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2002; 22 (02) 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet GC. Early versus delayed treatment of extension type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (03) 380-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Larson AN, Garg S, Weller A. et al. Operative treatment of type II supracondylar humerus fractures: does time to surgery affect complications?. J Pediatr Orthop 2014; 34 (04) 382-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Prabhakar P, Ho CA. Delaying surgery in type III supracondylar humerus fractures does not lead to longer surgical times or more difficult reduction. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 (08) e285-e290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar