Structured Referral Call Handling Process Improves Neonatal Transport Dispatch Times

Abstract

Objective In 2019 the Southern Alberta Neonatal Transport Service adopted a transport call handling process change to expedite transport team mobilization. This study compares the impact of this change on neonatal transport decision to dispatch and mobilization times.

Study Design This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a historical cohort of neonates referred for transportation between January 2017 and December 2021. The “dispatch time” (DT) was the time from the start of consultation to the time a decision to dispatch the transport team was made, whereas “mobilization time” (MT) referred to the time from start of consultation to the time the team departed the home base. In 2019, a DT target of <3 minutes was implemented to meet a target MT of <15 and <30 minutes for emergent and urgent high-risk transport referral calls, respectively. In 2021 use of the “Situation” component of the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool was introduced with the transport team asking five questions to determine need for mobilization. Data between 2017 and 2018 represented the preintervention period, 2019, the “washout” period for implementation, and 2020 to 2021, the postintervention period. Data were analyzed to determine trends in DT and MT.

Results The DT was reduced from a median of 5 to 3 minutes following intervention (p < 0.001). DT target goal of 3 minutes was achieved in 67.08% of calls compared with 26.24% in the preintervention period, (p < 0.001). The team achieved MT target goals in 42.71% of urgent and emergent transfers compared with 18.05% prior to intervention (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Introduction of a time-sensitive referral call handling process improved dispatch and mobilization time of the neonatal transport team.

Key Points

• Time-sensitive triaging of neonatal transport referrals improves dispatch and mobilization time.

• A structured referral call handling process improves the efficiency of neonatal transport decision-making.

• Dedicated neonatal transport vehicles are likely to improve neonatal transport mobilization time.

Keywords

neonatal transport - neonatal referral call handling - neonatal transport mobilization - neonatal transport outcomes

^* Dr Khorshid Mohammad and Dr Soumya Thomas contributed equally as first authors.

Publication History

Received: 27 February 2023

Accepted: 02 June 2023

Article published online:
10 July 2023

• References

• 1 Quinn JM, Pierce MC, Adler M. Factors associated with mode of transport decision making for pediatric-neonatal interfacility transport. Air Med J 2015; 34 (01) 44-51
• 2 Abdul Wahab MG, Thomas S, Murthy P, Anbu Chakkarapani A. Factors affecting stabilization times in neonatal transport. Air Med J 2019; 38 (05) 334-337
• 3 Chakkarapani AA, Whyte HE, Massé E, Castaldo M, Yang J, Lee KS. Canadian Neonatal Transport Network. Procedural interventions and stabilization times during interfacility neonatal transport. Air Med J 2020; 39 (04) 276-282
• 4 Mori R, Fujimura M, Shiraishi J. et al. Duration of inter-facility neonatal transport and neonatal mortality: systematic review and cohort study. Pediatr Int 2007; 49 (04) 452-458
• 5 Lee KS. Neonatal transport metrics and quality improvement in a regional transport service. Transl Pediatr 2019; 8 (03) 233-245
• 6 Shahid S, Thabane L, Marrin M. et al. Evaluation of a modified SBAR report to physician tool to standardize communication on neonatal transport. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (02) 216-224
• 7 Wilson D, Kochar A, Whyte-Lewis A, Whyte H, Lee KS. Evaluation of situation, background, assessment, recommendation tool during neonatal and pediatric interfacility transport. Air Med J 2017; 36 (04) 182-187
• 8 De Vries S, Wallis LA, Maritz D. A retrospective evaluation of the impact of a dedicated obstetric and neonatal transport service on transport times within an urban setting. Int J Emerg Med 2011; 4 (01) 28
• 9 Karlsen KA, Trautman M, Price-Douglas W, Smith S. National survey of neonatal transport teams in the United States. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (04) 685-691
• 10 Soliman Y, Paul R, Pearson K, Alshaikh B, Thomas S, Yusuf K. Neonatal transport services, a cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34 (05) 774-779
• 11 Mullane D, Byrne H, Clarke TA. et al. Neonatal transportation: the effects of a national neonatal transportation programme. Ir J Med Sci 2004; 173 (02) 105-108
• 12 Jordán Lucas R, Boix H, Sánchez García L, Cernada M, Cuevas IL, Couce ML. en representación de las Comisiones de Estándares y Transporte Neonatal, Sociedad Española de Neonatología. Recommendations on the skills profile and standards of the neonatal transport system in Spain. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 2021; 94 (06) 420.e1-420.e11
• 13 Fenton AC, Leslie A. The state of neonatal transport services in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97 (06) F477-F481
• 14 Millán García Del Real N, Sánchez García L, Ballesteros Diez Y. et al. Importance of specialized paediatric and neonatal transport. Current situation in Spain: Towards a more equitable and universal future. An Pediatr (Engl Ed) 2021; 95 (06) 485.e1-485.e10
• 15 Lee SK, Zupancic JA, Sale J. et al. Cost-effectiveness and choice of infant transport systems. Med Care 2002; 40 (08) 705-716
• 16 Akula VP, Hedli LC, Van Meurs K, Gould JB, Peiyi K, Lee HC. Neonatal transport in California: findings from a qualitative investigation. J Perinatol 2020; 40 (03) 394-403