PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2023; 15(02): e132-e143
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771044
Research Article

Ophthalmic Education: The Top 100 Cited Articles in Ophthalmology Journals

Asher Khan
1   College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Neal Rangu
1   College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Chanon Thanitcul
3   Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Kamran M. Riaz
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
,
Fasika A. Woreta 
3   Department of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To identify the top 100 (T100) cited articles on ophthalmic education and examine trends and areas of focus in ophthalmic education.

Methods A literature search was conducted for articles published between 2011 and 2021 related to ophthalmic education within ophthalmology journals using the ISI Web of Science Core Collection database. The search was performed in June 2022 and was conducted using the search phrase ([educat* OR teach* OR instruct* OR train* OR “medical student*” OR residen* OR fellow* OR undergrad* OR postgrad* OR “faculty” OR “attending”] AND *ophthalm*). Results were analyzed using VOSviewer v.1.6.18 and statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.

Results The majority of articles were published in the Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (19%), followed by Ophthalmology (12%), and Eye (12%). Articles were most often published in the year 2013 (15%), followed by 2014 (12%) and 2012 (12%). Articles most commonly originated from English-speaking countries, including the United States (43%), England (14%), Canada (8%), and India (8%). Topics most often examined in ophthalmic education were resident education (51%), medical school education (21%), and surgical training (21%). The most common study types were cohort studies (22%), case series (21%), and prospective trials (16%). There were 16 institutions that produced more than one article in the T100 articles list.

Conclusion The T100 articles on ophthalmic education were primarily U.S. based and focused on resident education, surgical training, and medical school ophthalmic curriculum. Further research into ophthalmic education is warranted to establish evidence-based curricula guidelines.

Keywords

ophthalmic education - bibliometrics - scientometrics - curricula guidelines


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Januar 2023

Angenommen: 12. Juni 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. Juli 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Succar T, Grigg J, Beaver HA, Lee AG. Advancing ophthalmology medical student education: International insights and strategies for enhanced teaching. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; 65 (02) 263-271
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bakshi SK, Ho AC, Chodosh J, Fung AT, Chan RVP, Ting DSW. Training in the year of the eye: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmic education. Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 104 (09) 1181-1183
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lee AG, Golnik KC, Tso MO, Spivey B, Miller K, Gauthier TM. The international council of ophthalmology: vision for ophthalmic education in an interdependent world. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 154 (04) 620-624.e2
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Williams M, Boohan M, Thurston A. Scoping systematic review on the extent, nature and quality of evidence underlying ophthalmic and paraophthalmic education. Evid Based Med 2017; 22 (01) 23-26
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Schulz CB, Kennedy A, Rymer BC. Trends in ophthalmology journals: a five-year bibliometric analysis (2009-2013). Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9 (11) 1669-1675
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics 2015; 105 (03) 1809-1831
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr 2006; 3: 7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pham AT, Whitescarver TD, Beatson B. et al. Ophthalmic trauma: the top 100 cited articles in ophthalmology journals. Eye (Lond) 2022; 36 (12) 2328-2333
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Nov E, Moisseiev E. The top 100 most-cited papers on intravitreal injections: a bibliographic perspective. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14: 2757-2772
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Spivey BE. Elevating ophthalmic education and practice in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018; 66 (06) 741-742
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Grzybowski A, Shtayer C, Schwartz SG, Moisseiev E. The 100 most cited papers on retinal detachment: a bibliographic perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; 106 (03) 305-311
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Campbell FM. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1990; 78 (04) 376-382
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Link AM. US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA 1998; 280 (03) 246-247
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Guerin MB, Flynn TH, Brady J, O'Brien CJ. Worldwide geographical distribution of ophthalmology publications. Int Ophthalmol 2009; 29 (06) 511-516
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Davis M, Wilson CS. Research contributions in ophthalmology: Australia's productivity. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 31 (04) 286-293
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Parrish II RK, Duncan Powers SL. The American Journal of Ophthalmology, not an “American” Journal of Ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 180: xiii-xiv
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Stefánsson E, Zetterström C, Ehlers N. et al. Nordic research in ophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81 (06) 556-566
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Heijl A, Algvere PV, Alm A. et al. Nordic research in ophthalmology. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83 (03) 278-288
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 McDonnell PJ, Kirwan TJ, Brinton GS. et al. Perceptions of recent ophthalmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (02) 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Gedde SJ, Volpe NJ, Feuer WJ, Binenbaum G. Ophthalmology resident surgical competence: a survey of program directors. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (08) 1123-1125
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Qiu M, Woreta FA, Boland MV. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery in US ophthalmology residency: surgical case log cross-sectional analysis and proposal for new glaucoma procedure classification. J Glaucoma 2021; 30 (07) 621-628
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Liebman DL, McKay KM, Haviland MJ, Moustafa GA, Borkar DS, Kloek CE. Quantifying the educational benefit of additional cataract surgery cases in ophthalmology residency. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46 (11) 1495-1500
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Winkel AF, Nguyen AT, Morgan HK, Valantsevich D, Woodland MB. Whose problem is it? The priority of physician wellness in residency training. J Surg Educ 2017; 74 (03) 378-383
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Benbassat J, Polak BC, Javitt JC. Objectives of teaching direct ophthalmoscopy to medical students. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90 (06) 503-507
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Falfoul Y, Chebil A, Halouani S, Bouraoui R, Fekih O, El Matri L. E-learning for ophthalmology training continuity during COVID-19 pandemic: satisfaction of residents of Hédi Raies Institut of Ophthalmology of Tunis. Tunis Med 2021; 99 (02) 207-214
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Swampillai AJ, Nowak VA, Maubon L. et al; Ophthalmology Trainee Clinical Research Network. Confidence of UK ophthalmology registrars in managing posterior capsular rupture: results from a national trainee survey. Ophthalmol Ther 2022; 11 (01) 225-237
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Rothschild P, Richardson A, Beltz J, Chakrabarti R. Effect of virtual reality simulation training on real-life cataract surgery complications: systematic literature review. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021; 47 (03) 400-406
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Thomsen AS, Bach-Holm D, Kjærbo H. et al. Operating room performance improves after proficiency-based virtual reality cataract surgery training. Ophthalmology 2017; 124 (04) 524-531
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 1987; 257 (01) 52-59
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (04) 1385-1389
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (06) 2234-2242
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Ross JS. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies are more often alike than unlike. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (10) 1557
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar