CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2023; 56(04): 310-319
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771295
Systematic Review

Outcomes of Composite Grafts for Pediatric Fingertip Amputations: A Systematic Review

Noemi Jester*
1   Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
2   Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
,
Seunghee Han*
3   Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Manwi Singh*
1   Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
2   Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
,
1   Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
2   Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
,
4   Keele Medical School, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme United Kingdom
,
1   Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Andrea Jester
1   Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to explore the outcomes of composite grafts in fingertip amputations in children as well as the contributing factors that may affect outcomes.

Methods Literature search was conducted across six databases in March 2022 to select studies on the use of composite grafts on fingertip amputations in the pediatric population.

Results Twelve articles with 735 composite grafts were identified for review. Most fingertip injuries occurred in the less than 5-year age group and were due to crush type injuries. In studies that reported “complete” graft take as a separate outcome measure, 17.3% of fingertips with this result were observed. In the studies that reported “complete” and “partial” graft take together as an outcome measure, 81.6% of fingertips achieved this outcome. A lower proportion of failed graft take was observed in more distal fingertip amputations. Infection (3.8%) and nail abnormalities (3.4%) were the most common complications following composite grafting.

Conclusion Composite grafting can be considered as a useful method of treatment in this population. Clinicians should be aware of the potential complications following this method of treatment such as infection and nail abnormalities. More proximal fingertip amputations may warrant other surgical interventions (beyond Level II on the modified Ishikawa/Ishikawa classification). Significant heterogeneity was observed within the studies, mainly due to lack of standardization in assessment and reporting of outcomes.

Statement of Informed Consent

The authors declare that no identifiable patient data was used; therefore, informed consent was not applicable.


Statement of Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.


Authors' Contributions

All authors made significant contributions to the work and can claim authorship according to the conditions posed.


* Co-first authors




Publication History

Article published online:
28 July 2023

© 2023. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Saraf S, Tiwari V. Fingertip injuries. Indian J Orthop 2007; 41 (02) 163-168
  • 2 Venkatesh A, Khajuria A, Greig A. Management of pediatric distal fingertip injuries: a systematic literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (01) e2595
  • 3 Kawaiah A, Thakur M, Garg S, Kawasmi SH, Hassan A. Fingertip injuries and amputations: a review of the literature. Cureus 2020; 12 (05) e8291
  • 4 Singh M, Saxena A. Microsurgery: a useful and versatile tool in surgical field. Surgery Curr Res. 2014; 4: 194
  • 5 Borrelli MR, Landin ML, Agha R, Greig A. Composite grafts for fingertip amputations: a systematic review protocol. Int J Surg Protoc 2019; 16: 1-4
  • 6 Butler DP, Murugesan L, Ruston J, Woollard AC, Jemec B. The outcomes of digital tip amputation replacement as a composite graft in a paediatric population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41 (02) 164-170
  • 7 Douglas B. Successful replacement of completely avulsed portions of fingers as composite grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1959; 23 (03) 213-225
  • 8 Elliot D, Moiemen NS. Composite graft replacement of digital tips. 1. Before 1850 and after 1950. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (03) 341-345
  • 9 Heistein JB, Cook PA. Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (03) 299-303
  • 10 Hirasé Y. Postoperative cooling enhances composite graft survival in nasal-alar and fingertip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46 (08) 707-711
  • 11 Moiemen NS, Elliot D. Composite graft replacement of digital tips. 2. A study in children. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (03) 346-352
  • 12 Showalter JT. Results of replacement of fingertip tissue. Int Surg 1968; 50 (04) 306-310
  • 13 Reid DBC, Shah KN, Eltorai AEM. et al. Epidemiology of finger amputations in the United States from 1997 to 2016. J Hand Surg Glob Onl 2019; 1: 45-51
  • 14 Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC. et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919
  • 15 Son D, Han K, Chang DW. Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing. Int Wound J 2005; 2 (04) 315-321
  • 16 Das SK, Brown HG. Management of lost finger tips in children. Hand 1978; 10 (01) 16-27
  • 17 Ishikawa K, Ogawa Y, Soeda H, Yoshida Y. A new classification of the amputation level for the distal part of the fingers. J Jpn Soc Microsurg. 1990; 3: 54-62
  • 18 Hirase Y. Salvage of fingertip amputated at nail level: new surgical principles and treatments. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (02) 151-157
  • 19 Tamai S. Twenty years' experience of limb replantation–review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am 1982; 7 (06) 549-556
  • 20 Eo S, Hur G, Cho S, Azari KK. Successful composite graft for fingertip amputations using ice-cooling and lipo-prostaglandin E1. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (06) 764-770
  • 21 Urso-Baiarda F, Wallace C, Baker R. Post-traumatic composite graft fingertip replantation in both adults and children. Eur J Plast Surg 2009; 32: 229-233
  • 22 Uysal A, Kankaya Y, Ulusoy MG. et al. An alternative technique for microsurgically unreplantable fingertip amputations. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (05) 545-551
  • 23 Eberlin KR, Busa K, Bae DS, Waters PM, Labow BI, Taghinia AH. Composite grafting for pediatric fingertip injuries. Hand (N Y) 2015; 10 (01) 28-33
  • 24 Imaizumi A, Ishida K, Arashiro K, Nishizeki O. Validity of exploration for suitable vessels for replantation in the distal fingertip amputation in early childhood: replantation or composite graft. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2013; 47 (04) 258-262
  • 25 Murphy AD, Keating CP, Penington A, McCombe D, Coombs CJ. Paediatric fingertip composite grafts: do they all go black?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (02) 173-177
  • 26 Karakas AO, Yuce E. Evaluation of pediatric fingertip injuries using etiology, demographics and therapy. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2020; 54 (03) 306-312
  • 27 Jerome JTJ, Malshikare VA. Fingertip injuries outcome score. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (06) e4386