Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery—Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery

Abstract

Background Composite T-grafts between left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and radial artery (RA) are a common concept in complete arterial myocardial revascularization. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the use of the great saphenous vein (SV) instead of RA leads to comparably good results in terms of outcome in this context.

Methods Patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with a T-graft using RA or a segment of SV to the right coronary artery or circumflex artery between the beginning of 2014 and the end of 2019 at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel were included. To minimize surgical variation, only patients were observed by a single senior surgeon in the department. Exclusion criteria were previous cardiac surgery, preoperative extracorporeal circulatory support, off-pump surgery, additional aortocoronary bypasses, and cardiac combination procedures.

Results A total of 115 patients were studied. In 55 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and SV, and in 60 patients, the T-graft was placed between the LIMA and RA. Patients in the SV group were older (70.6 ± 7.8 vs. 58.5 ± 10.0 years; p < 0.001), suffered more frequently from non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (12.7 vs. 1.7%; p = 0.027), arterial hypertension (83.6 vs. 61.7%; p = 0.009), and atrial fibrillation (18.2 vs. 1.7%; p = 0.003). They were less likely to be active smokers (16.4 vs. 38.3%; p = 0.009) and less likely to have a history of variceal surgery (0 vs. 15.0%; p = 0.003). Calcification of the ascending aorta was also found more frequently in the saphenous group (18.2 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.009). Operative times and number of distal anastomoses did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative deliriums (16.7 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.043) were observed more frequently in venous patients. Wound healing disorders of the leg (11.1 vs. 0%; p = 0.011) did only occur in SV group and wound infections of the arm only in the RA group. Complete follow-up was achieved in 74.8% of cases. Median follow-up was 60.3 (39.6; 73.2) months. Serious adverse cardiac–cerebral events (19.0 vs. 22.7%; p = 0.675) and mortality (14.5 vs. 6.7%; p = 0.167) did not differ significantly between the groups at follow-up. Myocardial infarction (0 vs. 2.5%; p = 1.000) and stroke (0 vs. 7.5%; p = 0.245) were observed exclusively in RA group. Percutaneous coronary intervention was required in single patients of RA group (0 vs. 15.0%; p = 0.028). No patient from either group underwent repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The patients of SV group had angiographically competent grafts and open anastomoses. Graft failure was noted in a single patient in RA group, in which case both grafts and native coronary vessels were stented. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed no significant survival disadvantage for SV group compared with RA group.

Conclusion CABG with a composite T-graft between LIMA and a segment of SV may be comparable to bypass surgery with a composite T-graft between LIMA and RA. This might be true in terms of morbidity and mortality over an intermediate-term observation period. The results of our studies give rise to the hypothesis that the decision not to perform aortic bypass anastomosis may be more important than the choice of graft material.

Keywords

coronary artery bypass grafting - CABG - T-Graft - Composite graft - Saphenous vein - internal thoracic artery - aortic bypass anastomosis

^* These authors contributed equally to this study.

Publication History

Received: 24 February 2023

Accepted: 19 June 2023

Article published online:
28 July 2023

• References

• 1 Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (42) 3232-3245
• 2 Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP. et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013; 381 (9867): 629-638
• 3 Kereiakes DJ. Reassessing the importance of complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2014; 15 (01) 24-30
• 4 Obed D, Fleissner F, Martens A. et al. Total arterial revascularization with radial artery and internal thoracic artery T-grafts is associated with superior long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 26 (01) 30-39
• 5 Yang JF, Zhang HC, Gu CX, Wei H. Total arterial off-pump coronary revascularization with a bilateral internal mammary artery Y graft (208 cases). J Surg Tech Case Rep 2012; 4 (01) 10-14
• 6 Ruka E, Dagenais F, Mohammadi S, Chauvette V, Poirier P, Voisine P. Bilateral mammary artery grafting increases postoperative mediastinitis without survival benefit in obese patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 50 (06) 1188-1195
• 7 Hwang HY, Kim KB. Saphenous vein as a composite graft from the internal thoracic artery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 7 (05) 686-689
• 8 Mayorchak Y, Paterson H, Ryan JB. et al. Mammary artery to saphenous vein composite T grafts for coronary artery bypass: late follow-up. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2013; 54 (04) 531-536
• 9 Kim KB, Hwang HY, Hahn S, Kim JS, Oh SJ. A randomized comparison of the Saphenous Vein Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery as a Y-Composite Graft (SAVE RITA) trial: one-year angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148 (03) 901-907 , discussion 907–908
• 10 Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Pragliola C. et al. Composite Y internal thoracic artery-saphenous vein grafts: short-term angiographic results and vasoreactive profile. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127 (04) 1139-1144
• 11 Glineur D, Boodhwani M, Poncelet A. et al. Comparison of fractional flow reserve of composite Y-grafts with saphenous vein or right internal thoracic arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140 (03) 639-645
• 12 Lobo HG, Lobo JG, Pimentel MD. et al. Intraoperative analysis of flow dynamics in arteriovenous composite Y grafts. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2016; 31 (05) 351-357
• 13 Hwang HY, Lee KH, Han JW, Kim KB. Equivalency of saphenous vein and arterial composite grafts: 5-year angiographic and midterm clinical follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102 (02) 580-588
• 14 Tabata M, Grab JD, Khalpey Z. et al. Prevalence and variability of internal mammary artery graft use in contemporary multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Circulation 2009; 120 (11) 935-940
• 15 Ji Q, Song K, Xia L. et al. Sequential saphenous vein coronary bypass grafting. Int Heart J 2018; 59 (06) 1211-1218
• 16 Di Bacco L, Repossini A, Muneretto C, Torkan L, Bisleri G. Long-term outcome of total arterial myocardial revascularization versus conventional coronary artery bypass in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a propensity-match analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2020; 21 (05) 580-587
• 17 Towfighi A, Zheng L, Ovbiagele B. Sex-specific trends in midlife coronary heart disease risk and prevalence. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169 (19) 1762-1766
• 18 Saito A, Kumamaru H, Ono M, Miyata H, Motomura N. Propensity-matched analysis of a side-clamp versus an anastomosis assist device in cases of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 54 (05) 889-895
• 19 Osswald BR, Blackstone EH, Tochtermann U, Thomas G, Vahl CF, Hagl S. The meaning of early mortality after CABG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 15 (04) 401-407
• 20 Ippolito D, Fior D, Franzesi CT, Riva L, Casiraghi A, Sironi S. Diagnostic accuracy of 256-row multidetector CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-gating combined with fourth-generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in the assessment of coronary artery bypass: evaluation of dose reduction and image quality. Radiol Med (Torino) 2017; 122 (12) 893-901
• 21 Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S. et al; RADIAL Investigators. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (22) 2069-2077
• 22 Rupprecht L, Schmid C, Debl K, Lunz D, Flörchinger B, Keyser A. Impact of coronary angiography early after CABG for suspected postoperative myocardial ischemia. J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 14 (01) 54
• 23 Olesen KKW, Madsen M, Lip GYH. et al. Coronary artery disease and risk of adverse cardiac events and stroke. Eur J Clin Invest 2017; 47 (11) 819-828