Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771377
Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study
Funding This study was supported by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Dean's Summer Research Fund and by grant P30EY001765 (Wilmer Biostatistics Core Grant) from the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. These funding sources played no role in the design or conduct of this research.Abstract
Background Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice.
Objective We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training.
Methods This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using t-tests or Mann–Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution.
Results In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions (p = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18–0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31–0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97–0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12–2.96).
Conclusions Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.
Keywords
Retention - Training location - Internal hiring - Residents and fellows - Fellowship - Ophthalmology facultyPrior Abstracts/Poster Presentations
This material was previously presented in poster form at the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting in January 2022, the Johns Hopkins Institute for Excellence in Education Conference in March 2022, and the Women in Ophthalmology Summer Symposium in August 2022.
Publication History
Received: 28 February 2023
Accepted: 28 June 2023
Article published online:
31 July 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 2019 Report on Residents Executive Summary. AAMC. Accessed February 06, 2022 at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/interactive-data/report-residents/2019/executive-summary
- 2 Ahmed AA, Holliday EB, Ileto J. et al. Close to home: employment outcomes for recent radiation oncology graduates. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95 (03) 1017-1021
- 3 Egro FM, Beiriger J, Roy E, Nguyen VT. The relationship of residency and fellowship sites to academic faculty and leadership positions. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (S1 suppl 1): S114-S117
- 4 Active Physicians Practicing in the State Where They Completed Graduate Medical Education (GME) by Specialty. 2019 AAMC. Accessed February 06, 2022 at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-practicing-state-where-they-completed-graduate-medical-education-gme-specialty
- 5 Dotan G, Qureshi HM, Gaton DD. Chairs of United States Academic Ophthalmology Departments: a descriptive analysis and trends. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 196: 26-33
- 6 Dotan G, Qureshi HM, Saraf SS, Darnley-Fisch DA. Leadership of United States Academic Departments of Ophthalmology: chairperson characteristics, accomplishments, and personal insights. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 186: 69-76
- 7 Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi NA, Gedde SJ, Sridhar J. Residency Program Directors of United States Ophthalmology Programs: a descriptive analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 209: 71-76
- 8 US News & World Report, Best Hospitals for Ophthalmology 2021. Accessed February 06, 2022 at: https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings/ophthalmology
- 9 Census Reporter: Making Census Data Easy to Use. Accessed February 06, 2022 at: https://censusreporter.org/
- 10 Emami-Naeini P, Lieng MK, Chen J. Sex differences in salaries of academic ophthalmologists in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140 (05) 519-522
- 11 Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Haft P, Tielsch JM, Lee Y, Quigley HA. Factors influencing career choices among graduating ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (07) 1247-1254
- 12 Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Crane AM, Shi W. Factors influencing career decisions and satisfaction among newly practicing ophthalmologists. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 234: 285-326