A Retrospective Observational Study of Facial Dog Bite Injuries and Its Management in a Tertiary Care Center

Abstract

Background: Facial dog bite injuries result in significant emotional, psychological, and physical trauma to the victims involved and should be considered a significant health issue. The purpose of this study is to share our experience in the management and to add to the existing medical literature regarding the epidemiological patterns of facial dog bite injuries.

Materials and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, from January 2021 to January 2022. A total of 105 patients were included. The wounds were managed according to the recommendations made by the national rabies control program and surgical intervention was performed in the form of primary suturing or flap cover.

Results: Children of age group 0 to 10 years are most commonly affected. Pet dogs are the cause in 61% of cases and 57.1% of bites were provoked. Midface is most commonly affected and modified Lackmann's class 3A and 3B are the most common wounds.

Conclusion: In view of raising incidence of dog bites with pet dogs, the general public needs to be educated regarding the practices to prevent these injuries. Postexposure prophylaxis should be given to all affected individuals irrespective of the vaccination status of the dog. Immediate surgical intervention gives better results.

Keywords

face - dog bites - rabies post exposure prophylaxis - primary suturing - flap cover

Publication History

Article published online:
04 August 2023

• References

• 1 Karlson TA. The incidence of facial injuries from dog bites. JAMA 1984; 251 (24) 3265-3267
• 2 Natarajan S, Galinde JS, Asnani U, Sidana S, Ramaswami R. Facial dog bite injury. J Contemp Dent 2012; 2 (02) 34-38
• 3 Williams JV, Magennis P, Graham AJ. Modification of Lackmann's classification of facial bite wounds: an aid to assessment and recording. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 56 (09) 900-901
• 4 Ali SS, Ali SS. Dog bite injuries to the face: a narrative review of the literature. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 8 (03) 239-244
• 5 Lawson III GA, Kreymerman P, Nahai F. An unusual complication following rhytidectomy: iatrogenic parotid injury resulting in parotid fistula/sialocele. Aesthet Surg J 2012; 32 (07) 814-821
• 6 Jain P, Jain G. Study of general awareness, attitude, behavior, and practice study on dog bites and its management in the context of prevention of rabies among the victims of dog bite attending the OPD services of CHC Muradnagar. J Family Med Prim Care 2014; 3 (04) 355-358
• 7 Piccart F, Dormaar JT, Coropciuc R, Schoenaers J, Bila M, Politis C. Dog bite injuries in the head and neck region: a 20-year review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2019; 12 (03) 199-204
• 8 Agrawal A, Kumar P, Singhal R, Singh V, Bhagol A. Animal bite injuries in children: review of literature and case series. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 10 (01) 67-72
• 9 Touré G, Angoulangouli G, Méningaud JP. Epidemiology and classification of dog bite injuries to the face: a prospective study of 108 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (05) 654-658
• 10 Mota-Rojas D, Mariti C, Zdeinert A. et al. Anthropomorphism and its adverse effects on the distress and welfare of companion animals. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11 (11) 3263
• 11 Schultz RC, McMaster WC. The treatment of dog bite injuries, especially those of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49 (05) 494-500
• 12 Jain R, Prakash G, Midya M, Sharma P. Diverse spectrum of facial dog bite presentation and their management. International Surgery Journal 2018; 5 (09) 3017-3022
• 13 Berzon DR. The animal bite epidemic in Baltimore, Maryland: review and update. Am J Public Health 1978; 68 (06) 593-595
• 14 Rothe K, Tsokos M, Handrick W. Animal and human bite wounds. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015; 112 (25) 433-443