Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · VCOT Open 2023; 06(02): e122-e135
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774371
Original Article

The Effect of Working Length, Fracture, and Screw Configuration on Plate Strain in a 3.5-mm LCP Bone Model of Comminuted Fractures

S.H. Wainberg
1   Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
N.M.M. Moens
1   Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
Z. Ouyang
1   Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
,
J. Runciman
2   School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding Funding for this research was provided by the Ontario Veterinary College PetTrust Fund.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction This study provides a comprehensive examination of plate strain under realistic fracture configurations. The effect of plate working length, plate contact, fracture length, and position on strain was evaluated using bone surrogates subjected to “load-controlled,” nondestructive conditions.

Materials and Methods Five 3.5-mm locking compression plates (LCP) were instrumented with six strain gauges. The gauges were glued between holes in predetermined locations marked by laser engraving. Nine fracture models were created using bone surrogate, each representing a combination of the criteria under study: long versus short working length, degree of plate compression, fracture location, and fracture length. All five plates were tested under each of the nine configurations. The constructs were mounted in an Instron testing machine with a 5-kN load cell. Each specimen was cyclically loaded at a rate of 5 mm/min to 50, 100, and 200 N.

Results Decreased plate strain was noted with a short plate working length in all fracture configurations (p < 0.05). Increasing the plate working length increased the strain at higher loads and on the plate adjacent to the fracture gap. The size of the fracture gap and fracture location had minimal effects on plate strain (p < 0.05). Elevation of the plate off the bone (1.5 mm) resulted in increased plate strain under all loading conditions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion Our null hypothesis was rejected in that a short plate working length resulted in decreased plate strain in all comminuted fracture configurations. Our secondary hypothesis was validated in that elevation of the plate from the bone resulted in increased strain in all configurations. As plate strain identifies regions of mechanical weakness whereby a construct may prematurely fail by acute overload or cyclic fatigue, identifying factors that may increase plate strain allows the surgeon to reduce these variables as much as possible to reduce the incidence of implant failure and subsequent fracture failure.

Keywords

orthopaedic implants - orthopaedic surgery - locking plates - plate strain

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 12 October 2022

Accepted: 13 June 2023

Article published online:
26 September 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Chao P, Lewis DD, Kowaleski MP, Pozzi A. Biomechanical concepts applicable to minimally invasive fracture repair in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012; 42 (05) 853-872 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Szypryt P, Forward D. The use and abuse of locking plates. Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (04) 281-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cronier P, Pietu G, Dujardin C, Bigorre N, Ducellier F, Gerard R. The concept of locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (04) S17-S36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Smith WR, Ziran BH, Anglen JO, Stahel PF. Locking plates: tips and tricks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (10) 2298-2307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tan SLE, Balogh ZJ. Indications and limitations of locked plating. Injury 2009; 40 (07) 683-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Karnezis IA, Miles AW, Cunningham JL, Learmonth ID. “Biological” internal fixation of long bone fractures: a biomechanical study of a “noncontact” plate system. Injury 1998; 29 (09) 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Perren SM. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (08) 1093-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Leunig M, Hertel R, Siebenrock KA, Ballmer FT, Mast JW, Ganz R. The evolution of indirect reduction techniques for the treatment of fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (375) 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B63-B76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ellis T, Bourgeault CA, Kyle RF. Screw position affects dynamic compression plate strain in an in vitro fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15 (05) 333-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP: how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?. Injury 2003; 34 (Suppl. 02) B11-B19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Windofl M, Perren SM. Basic mechanobiology of bone healing. In: Babst R, Bavonratanavech S, Pesantez R. eds. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme, AO Publishing; 2012: 15-30
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Pearson T, Glyde M, Hosgood G, Day R. The effect of intramedullary pin size and monocortical screw configuration on locking compression plate-rod constructs in an in vitro fracture gap model. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28 (02) 95-103
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chao P, Conrad BP, Lewis DD, Horodyski M, Pozzi A. Effect of plate working length on plate stiffness and cyclic fatigue life in a cadaveric femoral fracture gap model stabilized with a 12-hole 2.4 mm locking compression plate. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9 (01) 125-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Foster MP, Papp S, Poitras P. Effects of screw position on construct stiffness, bone strain and plate strain in fracture fixation with locking plate. J Bone Jt Surgery Br 2009; 91-B (Supp_II): 236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maxwell M, Horstman CL, Crawford RL, Vaughn T, Elder S, McLaughlin R. The effects of screw placement on plate strain in 3.5 mm dynamic compression plates and limited-contact dynamic compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (02) 125-131
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hulse D, Hyman W, Nori M, Slater M. Reduction in plate strain by addition of an intramedullary pin. Vet Surg 1997; 26 (06) 451-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pearson T, Glyde MR, Day RE, Hosgood GL. The effect of intramedullary pin size and plate working length on plate strain in locking compression plate-rod constructs under axial load. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (06) 451-458
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kanchanomai C, Muanjan P, Phiphobmongkol V. Stiffness and endurance of a locking compression plate fixed on fractured femur. J Appl Biomech 2010; 26 (01) 10-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ahmad M, Nanda R, Bajwa AS, Candal-Couto J, Green S, Hui AC. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?. Injury 2007; 38 (03) 358-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kowalski MJ, Schemitsch EH, Harrington RM, Chapman JR, Swiontkowski MF. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of a noncontacting plate and currently used devices for tibial fixation. J Trauma 1996; 40 (01) 5-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O, Predieri M, Steinemann S, Gautier E. The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109 (06) 304-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar