CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2023; 14(03): 135-143
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774773
Research Article

Efficacy of Over-the-Scope Clips Compared to Standard Therapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

1   Department of Gastroenterology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Sidharth Harindranath
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Marko Kozyk
3   Department of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Michigan, United States
,
Aditya Kale
4   Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Vaneet Jearth
5   Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Sridhar Sundaram
4   Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The current standard of treatment for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) includes endoscopic hemostasis with either through-the-scope clips or thermal therapy. However, they may be associated with rebleeding, especially in high-risk ulcers. Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) have been demonstrated in multiple recent studies to be an effective measure for NVUGIB. We aimed to analyze the current literature on standard therapy with OTSC to manage NVUGIB. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling the data from randomized studies obtained from a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus from inception to February 2023. The outcomes analyzed included rates of persistent bleeding, rebleeding, mortality, and duration of hospitalization. A total of five studies were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in the risk of persistent bleeding between the groups, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07–1.27). The use of OTSC was associated with a significantly lower risk of 7-day and 30-day rebleeding compared with standard therapy with RR of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16–0.59) and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.24–0.72), respectively. There was no difference in the risk of 30-day mortality or the duration of hospitalization. There was no change in the effect on subgroup analysis of studies using OTSC as first-line therapy. The use of OTSC can reduce the rebleeding rates after endoscopic hemostasis. However, they may not reduce the risk of persistent bleeding or mortality. Future studies are required on the cost-efficacy of this modality.

Authors' Contributions

S.G. and S.H. conceptualized the study. S.G. and A.K. were involved in methodology. S.G., S.H., and M.K. contributed to formal analysis. A.K. and S.S. helped in Project administration. S.G., S.H., and V.J. were involved in visualization. S.G. helped in software. S.G., S.H., and V.J. validated the study. S.G., S.H., and M.K. wrote the original draft. S.G., S.H., V.J., and S.S. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.




Publication History

Article published online:
09 October 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ. et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy 2021; 53 (03) 300-332
  • 2 Jensen DM, Kovacs TOG, Ohning GV. et al. Doppler endoscopic probe monitoring for blood flow improves risk stratification and outcomes of patients with severe non-variceal UGI hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 1310-1318
  • 3 Richter-Schrag HJ, Glatz T, Walker C, Fischer A, Thimme R. First-line endoscopic treatment with over-the-scope clips significantly improves the primary failure and rebleeding rates in high-risk gastrointestinal bleeding: A single-center experience with 100 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (41) 9162-9171
  • 4 Wedi E, Fischer A, Hochberger J, Jung C, Orkut S, Richter-Schrag HJ. Multicenter evaluation of first-line endoscopic treatment with the OTSC in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and comparison with the Rockall cohort: the FLETRock study. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (01) 307-314
  • 5 Brandler J, Baruah A, Zeb M. et al. Efficacy of over-the-scope clips in management of high-risk gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16 (05) 690-696.e1
  • 6 Mangiafico S, Pigò F, Bertani H. et al. Over-the-scope clip vs epinephrine with clip for first-line hemostasis in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a propensity score match analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8 (01) E50-E58
  • 7 Robles-Medranda C, Oleas R, Alcívar-Vásquez J, Puga-Tejada M, Baquerizo-Burgos J, Pitanga-Lukashok H. Over-the-scope clip system as a first-line therapy for high-risk bleeding peptic ulcers: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (05) 2198-2205
  • 8 Buddam A, Rao S, Koppala J. et al. Over-the-scope clip as first-line therapy for ulcers with high-risk bleeding stigmata is efficient compared to standard endoscopic therapy. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9 (10) E1530-E1535
  • 9 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
  • 10 Schmidt A, Gölder S, Goetz M. et al. Over-the-scope clips are more effective than standard endoscopic therapy for patients with recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcers. Gastroenterology 2018; 155 (03) 674-686.e6
  • 11 Jensen DM, Kovacs T, Ghassemi KA, Kaneshiro M, Gornbein J. Randomized controlled trial of over-the-scope clip as initial treatment of severe nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19 (11) 2315-2323.e2
  • 12 Meier B, Wannhoff A, Denzer U. et al. Over-the-scope-clips versus standard treatment in high-risk patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial (STING-2). Gut 2022; 71 (07) 1251-1258
  • 13 Chan S, Pittayanon R, Wang HP. et al. Use of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus standard therapy for the prevention of rebleeding in large peptic ulcers (size ≥1.5 cm): an open-labelled, multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Gut 2023; 72 (04) 638-643
  • 14 Lau JYW, Li R, Tan CH. et al. Comparison of over-the-scope clips to standard endoscopic treatment as the initial treatment in patients with bleeding from a nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal cause: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176 (04) 455-462
  • 15 Jensen DM, Ohning GV, Kovacs TOG. et al. Doppler endoscopic probe as a guide to risk stratification and definitive hemostasis of peptic ulcer bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83 (01) 129-136
  • 16 Chandrasekar VT, Desai M, Aziz M. et al. Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2019; 51 (10) 941-949
  • 17 Kuellmer A, Behn J, Meier B. et al. Over-the-scope clips are cost-effective in recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7 (09) 1226-1233
  • 18 Bapaye J, Chandan S, Naing LY. et al. Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips versus standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96 (05) 712-720.e7