Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced 3D Imaging with 2D Imaging in the Evaluation of Perianal Fistula at 3T: A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract

Introduction Perianal fistula and its recurrence is a challenging entity for surgeons. It is a well-establi1shed fact that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings influence surgical procedures and reduce the rate of recurrence. In this study, we assessed the contrast-enhanced (CE) three dimensional T1 sequences [sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE)] in a 3T MRI system to evaluate perianal fistulas and compared them with two-dimensional (2D) sequences.

Materials and Methods Forty-four patients (mean age, 38.8 ± 15.3 [standard deviation]; 32 males, 12 females) with perianal fistula were included in this prospective study. The patients underwent conventional noncontrast, 2D sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, followed by postcontrast, 2D T1 images in both axial and coronal planes, and 3D sequences at 3T. Acquisition times were recorded for each sequence. Each postcontrast sequence was evaluated in terms of image quality, presence of artifacts, fistula type, presence of an abscess, visibility, and number of internal orifices. The surgical findings were considered the gold standard. The imaging findings were compared with the surgical findings.

Results In all three sequences, the fistula type and abscess were identified correctly in all patients. The sensitivity value for identification of ramifications utilizing CE 3D T1 VIBE sequence, CE 3D T1 SPACE, and CE 2D T1 images was 100, 86, and 36%, respectively. The number of internal orifices was identified by the CE 3D T1 VIBE and CE 3D T1 SPACE sequences in 100 and 92% of patients, respectively. CE 2D T1 images correctly identified internal orifices in 80% of patients. The overall scan time for each 3D sequence was shorter than for the combined postcontrast 2D sequences.

Conclusion CE 3D T1 SPACE and CE 3D T1 VIBE sequences outperformed conventional CE 2D sequences in the evaluation of perianal fistulas in terms of visibility and the number of internal orifices with a shorter scanning time. Among the 3D sequences, CE 3D T1 VIBE is slightly superior to CE 3D T1 SPACE sequence.

Keywords

3 Tesla - 3D sequence - abscess - perianal fistula - ramification - VIBE

Publication History

Article published online:
10 October 2023

• References

• 1 Whiteford MH, Kilkenny III J, Hyman N. et al; Standards Practice Task Force, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48 (07) 1337-1342
• 2 de Miguel Criado J, del Salto LG, Rivas PF. et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 2012; 32 (01) 175-194
• 3 Abbas MA, Jackson CH, Haigh PI. Predictors of outcome for anal fistula surgery. Arch Surg 2011; 146 (09) 1011-1016
• 4 Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 2006; 239 (01) 18-33
• 5 Sharma G, Khandige G, Mohan M. Magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistulas-a pictorial atlas. Indian J Gastroenterol 2016; 35 (05) 337-342
• 6 Lo Re G, Tudisca C, Vernuccio F. et al. MR imaging of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: sensitivity and specificity of STIR sequences. Radiol Med (Torino) 2016; 121 (04) 243-251
• 7 Yoshizako T, Wada A, Takahara T. et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for evaluating perianal fistula activity: feasibility study. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (09) 2049-2053
• 8 Cerit MN, Öner AY, Yıldız A, Cindil E, Şendur HN, Leventoğlu S. Perianal fistula mapping at 3 T: volumetric versus conventional MRI sequences. Clin Radiol 2020; 75 (07) 563.e1-563.e9
• 9 Carr S, Velasco AL. Fistula-in-ano. [Updated July 31, 2023]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
• 10 Proscia N, Jaffe TA, Neville AM, Wang CL, Dale BM, Merkle EM. MRI of the pelvis in women: 3D versus 2D T2-weighted technique. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (01) 254-259
• 11 Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14 (01) 17-26
• 12 Kataoka M, Ueda H, Koyama T. et al. Contrast-enhanced volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination compared with spin-echo T1-weighted imaging of head and neck tumors. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (01) 313-319
• 13 Baik J, Kim SH, Lee Y, Yoon JH. Comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging for evaluating perianal fistulas. Clin Imaging 2017; 44: 16-21
• 14 Komada T, Naganawa S, Ogawa H. et al. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of metastatic brain tumor at 3 tesla: utility of T(1)-weighted SPACE compared with 2D spin echo and 3D gradient echo sequence. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7 (01) 13-21
• 15 Mugler III JP. Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39 (04) 745-767
• 16 Yildirim N, Gökalp G, Öztürk E. et al. Ideal combination of MRI sequences for perianal fistula classification and the evaluation of additional findings for readers with varying levels of experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012; 18 (01) 11-19
• 17 Torkzad MR, Ahlström H, Karlbom U. Comparison of different magnetic resonance imaging sequences for assessment of fistula-in-ano. World J Radiol 2014; 6 (05) 203-209
• 18 Zhao J, Lu F, Wang Q. et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-3D-VIBE and T1-TSE MRI in evaluating anal fistula. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47 (11) 3688-3697
• 19 Schaefer O, Lohrmann C, Langer M. Assessment of anal fistulas with high-resolution subtraction MR-fistulography: comparison with surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19 (01) 91-98