Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775832
RECOSAN: Registry of Spinal Surgeries of Santiago, Multicenter and Prospective Study, First Report
Article in several languages: español | English
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to describe the frequency statistics of spinal surgeries and factors associated with postoperative complications in Santiago de Chile. Material and methods, a prospective, multicenter standardized data registry of spine surgeries in Santiago was carried out from September 2020 to October 2021, the RedCap database (Vanderbilt University, v11.0.3) was used, patients of all ages who underwent spinal surgery were included as inclusion criteria, and patients who refused to participate in the study and spinal infiltrations were entered as exclusion criteria. The statistical analysis was developed using the SPSS v26.0 program and associations between variables were made.
Results An association was found between ASA I patients compared to ASA II-V patients regarding postoperative complications at 30 days with an OR 1.71 (95% CI 1.05-2.78), p = 0.029, an association was found between preoperative morbid history and complications at 30 days, OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.08-2.66), p = 0.021.
Discussion This is the first prospective multicenter registry of data on spinal surgeries in Santiago, containing detailed and standardized demographic and clinical information on all surgeries. A strong association was found between ASA II-V patients and postoperative complications at 30 days, as well as a direct association between preoperative morbid history and complications at 30 days.
Conclusions This first report with 832 spinal surgeries gives us valuable information on the patterns of spinal surgery in Chile, we hope to improve the number and quality of data collection in later reports, there could be a sub-registration of data on postoperative complications compared to data published in the literature.
Publication History
Received: 12 July 2022
Accepted: 22 August 2023
Article published online:
30 October 2023
© 2023. Sociedad Chilena de Ortopedia y Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Bibliografía
- 1 Golinvaux NS, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Fu MC, Gardner EC, Grauer JN. Limitations of administrative databases in spine research: a study in obesity. Spine J 2014; 14 (12) 2923-2928
- 2 Hashimoto RE, Brodt ED, Skelly AC, Dettori JR. Administrative database studies: goldmine or goose chase?. Evid Based Spine Care J 2014; 5 (02) 74-76
- 3 Teles AR, Khoshhal KI, Falavigna Asdrubal. Why and how should we measure outcomes in spine surgery?. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2016; 11 (02) 91-97
- 4 McCormick JD, Werner BC, Shimer AL. Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21 (02) 99-107
- 5 Chung KC, Song JW. WRIST Study Group. A guide to organizing a multicenter clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (02) 515-523
- 6 Aghayev E, Roder C, Defino HLA, Herrero CF, Aebi M. The Importance of a Registry in Spinal Surgery. In: Pinheiro-Franco JL, Vaccaro AR, Benzel EC, Mayer M. , eds. Advanced Concepts in Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015: 793-804
- 7 Röder C, Müller U, Aebi M. The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (Suppl 1, Suppl 1) S52-S56