Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776341
Biological Dose Escalation—Do We Have a New Window of Opportunity in High-Grade Glioma?—A Feasibility Study
Authors
Abstract
Despite multimodality treatment in high-grade glioma (HGG) involving maximal safe resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, the prognosis remains dismal. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a method of biological enhancement by combining dose escalation with a condensed overall treatment time, aiming for maximal cytoreduction as a surrogate for improved outcomes. Hypofractionation has the dual advantage of enhanced cell kill with reduced overall treatment time. To this effect, we have employed a study involving hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) versus conventional treatment. As a secondary objective, we evaluated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in terms of optimal delivery technique for SIB boost. Forty patients were randomized into two arms, the study arm received 60 Gy in 25 fractions and the standard arm received 60 Gy in 30 fractions with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The patients were assessed radiologically for tumor cytoreduction and acute toxicity parameters weekly during treatment, 6 weeks post-treatment, and 3 monthly follow-up. All patients were planned using VMAT and IMRT techniques in the study arm for the comparison of treatment time and dosimetric efficiency. However, the treatment was performed through VMAT technique. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics including Student's t-tests, proportion tests, and Pearson correlation for association. The total sample size was estimated at 40, with 20 samples per group, providing a statistical power of 81% and a significance level (p-value) of 0.05. It was observed that tumor cytoreduction was significantly enhanced in a subgroup of patients in the study arm with smaller volume residual disease (p = 0.04) that was found at 6 weeks post-treatment evaluation. The tolerance, toxicity, and compliance were comparable in both arms. During the dosimetric evaluation, it was determined that VMAT had a significantly lower hot spot compared to the IMRT plan (64.22 Gy vs. 64.75 Gy, p = 0.02). It was also observed that the delivery with VMAT was faster and involved a lesser number of monitor units (555.7 MU vs. 679.6MU, p = 0.001). The hypofractionated SIB radiotherapy using the VMAT technique can provide a feasible method of biological dose enhancement without compromising toxicity and might have the future potential to improve local control in HGG.
Publication History
Article published online:
12 February 2024
© 2024. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Miranda-Filho A, Piñeros M, Soerjomataram I, Deltour I, Bray F. Cancers of the brain and CNS: global patterns and trends in incidence. Neuro-oncol 2017; 19 (02) 270-280
- 2 DeAngelis LM. Global consequences of malignant CNS tumours: a call to action. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (04) 324-325
- 3 Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ. et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352 (10) 987-996
- 4 Usman S, Chaudry S, Hameed S, Hussain K, Butt S. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme. J Cancer Allied Spec 2015; 1 (02) 3
- 5 Hingorani M, Colley WP, Dixit S, Beavis AM. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: strategy for poor-risk patients or hope for the future?. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1017) e770-e781
- 6 McAleese JJ, Stenning SP, Ashley S. et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for poor prognosis malignant glioma: matched pair survival analysis with MRC controls. Radiother Oncol 2003; 67 (02) 177-182
- 7 Panet-Raymond V, Ansbacher W, Zavgorodni S. et al. Coplanar versus noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for fronto-temporal high-grade glioma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012; 13 (04) 3826
- 8 Bas Ayata H, Ceylan C, Kılıç A, Güden M, Engin K. Comparison of multiple treatment planning techniques for high-grade glioma tumors near to critical organs. Oncol Res Treat 2018; 41 (09) 514-519
- 9 Loeffler JS, Alexander III E, Shea WM. et al. Radiosurgery as part of the initial management of patients with malignant gliomas. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10 (09) 1379-1385
- 10 Kaul D, Florange J, Badakhshi H. et al. Accelerated hyperfractionation plus temozolomide in glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11: 70
- 11 Arslan M, Karadeniz AN, Aksu G. et al. Postoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme. J Balkan Union Oncol 2006; 11 (01) 39-42
- 12 Liao G, Zhao Z, Yang H, Li X. Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 1017
- 13 Scoccianti S, Krengli M, Marrazzo L. et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) plus temozolomide in good prognosis patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter phase II study by the Brain Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO). Radiol Med (Torino) 2018; 123 (01) 48-62
- 14 Zhong L, Chen L, Lv S. et al. Efficacy of moderately hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with temozolomide for the postoperative treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: a single-institution experience. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14 (01) 104
- 15 Farzin M, Molls M, Astner S, Rondak IC, Oechsner M. Simultaneous integrated vs. sequential boost in VMAT radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191 (12) 945-952
- 16 Rapole PS, Karunanithi G, Kandasamy S, Prabhu S, Kumar R, Vivekanandam S. Dosimetric comparison and feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in treatment of malignant gliomas using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19 (09) 2499-2506
- 17 Loeffler JS, Alexander III E, Shea WM. et al. Radiosurgery as part of the initial management of patients with malignant gliomas. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10 (09) 1379-1385
- 18 Shaffer R, Nichol AM, Vollans E. et al. A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76 (04) 1177-1184
