PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(02): 665-671
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777044
Original Article

Osteogenic Differentiation and Proliferation of Apical Papilla Stem Cells Using Chitosan-Coated Nanohydroxyapatite and Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles

Sara Elshahat
1   Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Abeer Abdelhakim Elgendy
1   Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Tarek Elsewify 
1   Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2   Restorative Dental Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the osteogenic differentiation ability and proliferation of apical papilla stem cells (SCAPs) using chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite and bioactive glass nanoparticles.

Materials and Methods Hydroxyapatite, chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite, and bioactive glass 45S5 nanoparticles were prepared and characterized using a transmission electron microscope and X-ray diffraction. SCAPs were harvested from freshly extracted impacted wisdom teeth, cultured, and characterized using flow cytometric analysis. Tested nanomaterials were mixed and samples were classified into five equal groups as follows: negative control group: SCAP with Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium, positive control group: SCAP with inductive media, first experimental group: nanohydroxyapatite with SCAP, second experimental group: chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite with SCAP, third experimental group: bioactive glass nanoparticles with SCAP. Osteoblastic differentiation was assessed using an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assay. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa beta ligand (RANKL) expression was evaluated using specific polyclonal antibodies by fluorescence microscope. The proliferation of SCAP was assessed using cell count and viability of trypan blue in addition to an 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.

Results Isolated SCAP showed a nonhematopoietic origin. Chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite showed the highest ALP concentration followed by nanobioactive glass, nanohydroxyapatite, and negative control. Chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite showed the highest H score followed by nanobioactive glass, nanohydroxyapatite, and negative control in RANKL expression. Chitosan-coated nanohydroxyapatite showed the highest viable cell count.

Conclusion SCAP isolation is achievable from extracted fully impacted immature third molars. All tested biomaterials have the ability to induce osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of SCAP. Composite nanoparticle materials show better osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of SCAP than single nanoparticles.

Keywords

osteoinduction - osteoconduction - regenerative endodontic

Ethical Approval Statement

The research proposal was approved by the Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University ethical committee with approval number FDASU-Rec IM112105.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. März 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Yan M, Wu J, Yu Y. et al. Mineral trioxide aggregate promotes the odonto/osteogenic differentiation and dentinogenesis of stem cells from apical papilla via nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway. J Endod 2014; 40 (05) 640-647
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Yamaza T. et al. Characterization of the apical papilla and its residing stem cells from human immature permanent teeth: a pilot study. J Endod 2008; 34 (02) 166-171
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Nada OA, El Backly RM. Stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) as a tool for endogenous tissue regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2018; 6 (July): 103
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sun JY, Yang YS, Zhong J, Greenspan DC. The effect of the ionic products of bioglass dissolution on human osteoblasts growth cycle in vitro. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007; 1 (04) 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Xynos ID, Hukkanen MV, Batten JJ, Buttery LD, Hench LL, Polak JM. Bioglass 45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation In vitro: implications and applications for bone tissue engineering. Calcif Tissue Int 2000; 67 (04) 321-329
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 MačKović M, Hoppe A, Detsch R. et al Bioactive glass (type 45S5) nanoparticles: in vitro reactivity on nanoscale and biocompatibility. J Nanopart Res 2012; 14: 966
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 El-Gendy R, Yang XB, Newby PJ, Boccaccini AR, Kirkham J. Osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stromal cells on 45S5 Bioglass® based scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng Part A 2013; 19 (5-6): 707-715
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Yousefi AM, Oudadesse H, Akbarzadeh R, Wers E, Lucas-Girot A. Physical and biological characteristics of nanohydroxyapatite and bioactive glasses used for bone tissue engineering. Nanotechnol Rev 2014; 3 (06) 527-552
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Ratih DN, Mulyawati E, Santi RK, Kristanti Y. Antibacterial and cytotoxicity of root canal sealer with the addition of chitosan nanoparticle at various concentrations. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (02) 398-402
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Putranto AW, Suprastiwi E, Meidyawati R, Agusnar H. Characterization of novel cement-based carboxymethyl chitosan/amorphous calcium phosphate. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 809-814
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Torres-Rosas R, Torres-Gómez N, Moreno-Rodríguez A, García-Contreras R, Argueta-Figueroa L. Anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activity of the chitosan/chlorhexidine gel commercial preparation for postexodontia treatment: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (03) 397-403
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Boudemagh D, Venturini P, Fleutot S, Cleymand F. Elaboration of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles and Chitosan/Hydroxyapatite Composites: A Present Status [Internet]. Vol. 76, Polymer Bulletin. Berlin:: Springer;; 2019: 2621-2653 p.
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Vafa E, Bazargan-Lari R, Bahrololoom ME. Synthesis of 45S5 bioactive glass-ceramic using the sol-gel method, catalyzed by low concentration acetic acid extracted from homemade vinegar. J Mater Res Technol 2021; 10: 1427-1436
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Cengiz B, Gokce Y, Yildiz N, Aktas Z, Calimli A. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2008; 322 (1–3) 29-33
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Nikpour MR, Rabiee SM, Jahanshahi M. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanocomposite materials for medical engineering applications. Compos, Part B Eng 2012; 43 (04) 1881-1886
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Vuong Bùi X. Bioactive ceramic powder prepared using a new sol-gel process. Process Appl Ceram 2017; 11 (02) 87-92
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 El shahat S, Elgendy AA, Elsewify T. Characterization of human stem cells of the apical papilla. Ain Shams Dental Journal 2021; 24: 17-23
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Chueh LH, Ho YC, Kuo TC, Lai WH, Chen YHM, Chiang CP. Regenerative endodontic treatment for necrotic immature permanent teeth. J Endod 2009; 35 (02) 160-164
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Miller AA, Takimoto K, Wealleans J, Diogenes A. Effect of 3 bioceramic materials on stem cells of the apical papilla proliferation and differentiation using a dentin disk model. J Endod 2018; 44 (04) 599-603
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Lei G, Yan M, Wang Z. et al. Dentinogenic capacity: immature root papilla stem cells versus mature root pulp stem cells. Biol Cell 2011; 103 (04) 185-196
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Li J, Yan M, Wang Z. et al Effects of canonical NF-κB signaling pathway on the proliferation and odonto/osteogenic differentiation of human stem cells from apical papilla. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 319651
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gong W, Huang Z, Dong Y. et al. Ionic extraction of a novel nano-sized bioactive glass enhances differentiation and mineralization of human dental pulp cells. J Endod 2014; 40 (01) 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gough JE, Jones JR, Hench LL. Nodule formation and mineralisation of human primary osteoblasts cultured on a porous bioactive glass scaffold. Biomaterials 2004; 25 (11) 2039-2046
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Gholami S, Labbaf S, Houreh AB, Ting HK, Jones JR, Nasr Esfahani MH. Long term effects of bioactive glass particulates on dental pulp stem cells in vitro. Biomed Glas 2017; 3 (01) 96-103
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Yang X, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang R, Feng Q. In vitro uptake of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their effect on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2018; 2018: 2036176
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Houreh AB, Labbaf S, Ting HK, Ejeian F, Jones JR, Esfahani MHN. Influence of calcium and phosphorus release from bioactive glasses on viability and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. J Mater Sci 2017; 52 (15) 8928-8941
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Amir LR, Suniarti DF, Utami S, Abbas B. Chitosan as a potential osteogenic factor compared with dexamethasone in cultured macaque dental pulp stromal cells. Cell Tissue Res 2014; 358 (02) 407-415
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Piccinini F, Tesei A, Arienti C, Bevilacqua A. Cell counting and viability assessment of 2D and 3D cell cultures: expected reliability of the trypan blue assay. Biol Proced Online 2017; 19 (01) 8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Di Nardo P. et al. Adult Stem Cells Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media LLC; 2017: 194
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Plumb JA. Cell Sensitivity Assays: The MTT Assay. Langdon S.P.. (eds), Cancer Cell Culture. Methods in Molecular Medicine. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2004
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Gomes-Cornélio AL, Rodrigues EM, Salles LP. et al. Bioactivity of MTA Plus, Biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate-based cement on human osteoblast-like cells. Int Endod J 2017; 50 (01) 39-47
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Reilly GC, Radin S, Chen AT, Ducheyne P. Differential alkaline phosphatase responses of rat and human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells to 45S5 bioactive glass. Biomaterials 2007; 28 (28) 4091-4097
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Ryu W-S. Diagnosis and methods. Mol Virol Hum Pathog Viruses 2017; 47-62
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Magri AMP, Fernandes KR, Ueno FR. et al. Osteoconductive properties of two different bioactive glass forms (powder and fiber) combined with collagen. Appl Surf Sci 2017; 423: 557-565
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Gabbai-Armelin PR, Souza MT, Kido HW. et al. Effect of a new bioactive fibrous glassy scaffold on bone repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26 (05) 177
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Kang J, Fan W, Deng Q, He H, Huang F. Stem cells from the apical papilla: a promising source for stem cell-based therapy. BioMed Res Int 2019; 2019: 6104738
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Kong L, Gao Y, Lu G, Gong Y, Zhao N, Zhang X. A study on the bioactivity of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 2006; 42 (12) 3171-3179
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Hosseinzade M, Soflou RK, Valian A, Nojehdehian H. Physicochemical properties of MTA, CEM, hydroxyapatite and nano hydroxyapatite-chitosan dental cements. Biomed Res 2016; 27 (02) 442-448
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Ge S, Zhao N, Wang L. et al. Bone repair by periodontal ligament stem cellseeded nanohydroxyapatite-chitosan scaffold. Int J Nanomedicine 2012; 7: 5405-5414
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Matsunaga T, Yanagiguchi K, Yamada S, Ohara N, Ikeda T, Hayashi Y. Chitosan monomer promotes tissue regeneration on dental pulp wounds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76 (04) 711-720
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan - a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 2011; 36 (08) 981-1014
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Lieder R. Chitosan and chitosan derivatives in tissue engineering and stem cell biology. PhD thesis, Reykjavik Univ. 2013. ;(January):141
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Tondnevis F, Ketabi M, Fekrazad R, Sadeghi A, Abolhasani MM. Using chitosan besides nano hydroxyapatite and fluorohydroxyapatite boost dental pulp stem cell proliferation. J Biomim Biomater Biomed Eng 2019; 42: 39-50
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Wang S, Huang G, Dong Y. Directional migration and odontogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells induced by dentin coated with nanobioactive glass. J Endod 2020; 46 (02) 216-223
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar