The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants

Abstract

Objective This article determines the prevalence of physician parents among ophthalmology residency applications.

Design Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

Subjects All applicants to the University of Kentucky Ophthalmology Residency between 2018 and 2023.

Methods Residency applications were reviewed, with data collection including applicant gender, self-identified Under-Represented in Medicine (URiM) status, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, USMLE Step 2 score, and whether the application identified a doctor or physician as a parent. Doctor was defined as a profession requiring a doctorate degree, and similarly, physician as a profession requiring a medical degree.

Results A total of 2,057 applications were reviewed, representing 54% of all match participants during the study period. Fourteen percent (296) of applications indicated a parent was a doctor and 12% (253) a parent was a physician. There were no differences between gender, URiM, USMLE Step 1, and Step 2 scores between applicants indicating a doctor or physician as a parent and those that did not (p all > 0.4 and Cohen's d all < 0.02). Of the type of doctors, 85% (253) were physicians, 6% (17) optometrists, 6% (17) Doctors of Philosophy, 3% (8) dentists, 1% (1) pharmacist, and 1% (1) veterinarian. Eighty-six percent (217) of applications with a physician parent provided the type of physician, with ophthalmologist the most common (93, 43%). Ninety-eight percent (249) of applications with a physician parent provided the gender of the parent, with father (168, 68%) more common than mother (42, 17%) or both parents (39, 16%).

Conclusion Physician parents are substantially overrepresented in ophthalmology residency applicants. This raises concerns regarding diversity and inclusion efforts for recruitment in medicine.

Keywords

ophthalmology residency - residency application - graduate medical education - recruitment - physician parents - socioeconomic status

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. August 2023

Angenommen: 09. November 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Dezember 2023

• References

• 1 Perc M. The Matthew effect in empirical data. J R Soc Interface 2014; 11 (98) 20140378
• 2 Ma J, Pender M, Welch M. Education Pays 2016: The Benefit of Higher Education for Individuals and Society. New York, NY: College Board; 2016
• 3 Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC 2022 Official Guide to Medical School Admissions. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/569/
• 4 Association of American Medical Colleges. An updated look at the economic diversity of US Medical Students. October 2018 Analysis in Brief. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.aamc.org/media/9596/download?attachment
• 5 Asch DA, Grischkan J, Nicholson S. The cost, price, and debt of medical education. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (01) 6-9
• 6 Zhang D, Li G, Mu L. et al. Trends in medical school application and matriculation rates across the United States from 2001 to 2015: implications for health disparities. Acad Med 2021; 96 (06) 885-893
• 7 Pham C, Caso TJ, Cullen MJ. et al. Adverse childhood experiences, household income, and mentorship among interns who are underrepresented in medicine. J Grad Med Educ 2023; 15 (03) 309-315
• 8 Match SF. Residency and Fellowship Match Services. Accessed June 21, 2023 at: https://www.sfmatch.org/
• 9 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic; 1988
• 10 Association of American Medical Colleges. Holistic Review. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.aamc.org/services/member-capacity-building/holistic-review
• 11 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Equity Matters Holistic Recruitment Toolkit. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://dl.acgme.org/learning-paths/acgme-equity-matters-holistic-review-toolkit
• 12 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Diversity Policy. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.aao.org/about/policies/diversity
• 13 Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. AUPO Statement on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://aupo.org/news/2020-10/aupo-statement-diversity-equity-and-inclusion
• 14 Young A, Chaudhry HJ, Pei X, Arnhart K, Dugan M, Simons KB. FSMB Census of licensed physicians in the United States, 2020. J Med Regul 2021; 107 (02) 57-64
• 15 Civilian Labor Force. FRED. January 1948. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CLF16OV
• 16 Morgan AC, LaBerge N, Larremore DB, Galesic M, Brand JE, Clauset A. Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6 (12) 1625-1633
• 17 Hansen MN. Social background in recruitment of medical students [in Norwegian]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2005; 125 (16) 2213-2215
• 18 O'Neill L, Vonsild MC, Wallstedt B, Dornan T. Admission criteria and diversity in medical school. Med Educ 2013; 47 (06) 557-561
• 19 Polyakova M, Persson P, Hofmann K, Jena AB. Does medicine run in the family-evidence from three generations of physicians in Sweden: retrospective observational study. BMJ 2020; 371: m4453
• 20 Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2023. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2023-compensation-overview-6016341?faf=1#1
• 21 Semega J, Kollar MU. S Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60–276. Income in the United States: 2021. Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-276.pdf
• 22 Nguyen M, Desai MM, Fancher TL, Chaudhry SI, Mason HRC, Boatright D. Temporal trends in childhood household income among applicants and matriculants to medical school and the likelihood of acceptance by income, 2014–2019. JAMA 2023; 329 (21) 1882-1884
• 23 Mason HRC, Ata A, Nguyen M. et al. First-generation and continuing-generation college graduates' application, acceptance, and matriculation to U.S. medical schools: a national cohort study. Med Educ Online 2022; 27 (01) 2010291
• 24 Fenton JJ, Fiscella K, Jerant AF. et al. Reducing medical school admissions disparities in an era of legal restrictions: adjusting for applicant socioeconomic disadvantage. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2016; 27 (01) 22-34
• 25 Shahriar AA, Sagi V, Castañón-Gonzalez LA, Kottke TE, Vazquez-Benitez G, Crichlow R. Comparison of medical school financing plans among matriculating US medical students from 2017 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (07) e2117704
• 26 Moore DB. Not a cheap investment: estimating the cost of the 2017 to 2018 ophthalmology residency match to the applicant and program. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10: e158-e162
• 27 Brewster RCL, Butler A, Michelson CD, Kesselheim J. Evaluation of housing affordability among US resident physicians. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (06) e2320455
• 28 Students for fair admissions, inc v president and fellows of Harvard College. (Supreme Court of the United States 20–1199). Accessed November 27, 2023 at: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_hgdj.pdf
• 29 Henderson MC, Fancher TL, Murin S. Holistic admissions at UC Davis – journey toward equity. JAMA 2023; 330 (11) 1037-1038