CC BY 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 28(03): e424-e431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777447
Original Research

Anatomical Measurement as a Reference for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Based on CT Scans and Dissections

1   Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Campus Centro Oeste, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
,
Flávia Gontijo Amaral
2   Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
,
Marcell de Barros Duarte Pereira
2   Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil
,
Flávio Barbosa Nunes
3   Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Roberto Eustáquio Santos Guimarães
3   Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Funding The authors declare that they have received no financial support from agencies in the public, private, or non-profit sectors to conduct the present research.

Abstract

Introduction Diseases of the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavities, and those related to the skull base can be treated with nasal endoscopic surgery. Anatomical references are essential to safely perform these surgeries.

Objective To measure and compare the distance from the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus to the anterior skull base in cadavers and on computed tomography (CT) scans to determine a measurement as an anatomical reference in imaging exams for sinus and anterior skull base surgery.

Methods In dissections and CT scans, we took measurements from the most upper and medial point of the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus (point A) to the point where the skull base deflects and the anterior sphenoid wall is formed (Δ 90°; point B), in the right and left nasal cavities. We used 51 cadavers aged ≥ 18 years in the present research.

Results The measurements obtained from CT scans and dissections were greater than 1.5 cm in all cadavers, and they were positively correlated. The 1-cm increase in the AB-tomography measurement corresponded to the 1.08-cm increase to the right and 1.07-cm to the left in the AB-dissection measurement.

Conclusion The CT measurements may be considered a reliable tool to promote safe and effective access to the paranasal sinuses, matching the distance that should be dissected until the anterior base of the skull.



Publication History

Received: 07 October 2022

Accepted: 15 October 2023

Article published online:
05 July 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Luong A, Marple BF. Sinus surgery: indications and techniques. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006; 30 (03) 217-222
  • 2 Hemmerdinger SA, Jacobs JB, Lebowitz RA. Accuracy and cost analysis of image-guided sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005; 38 (03) 453-460
  • 3 Stamm A. Operação micro-endoscópica dos seios paranasais: conceitos básicos. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2002; 68 (03) 299-302
  • 4 de Miranda CMNR, Maranhão Cde M, Arraes FMNR. et al. Variações anatômicas das cavidades paranasais à tomografia computadorizada multislice: o que procurar?. Radiol Bras 2011; 44 (04) 256-262
  • 5 Kantarci M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbas O, Okur A, Karaman A. Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50 (03) 296-302
  • 6 Scutariu MD, Bâldea V. Neighbouring relations of the posterior ethmoid studied by axial computed tomography. Morphologie 2010; 94 (306) 51-57
  • 7 Tan HKK, Ong YK. Sphenoid sinus: an anatomic and endoscopic study in Asian cadavers. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (07) 745-750
  • 8 Dolci RLL, Miyake MM, Tateno DA. et al. Postoperative otorhinolaryngologic complications in transnasal endoscopic surgery to access the skull base. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2017; 83 (03) 349-355
  • 9 Chone CT, Sampaio MH, Sakano E. et al. Endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas: Preliminary evaluation of consecutive cases TT - Resseccao endoscopica transesfenoidal de adenomas de hipofise: Avaliacao preliminar de pacientes consecutivos. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2014; 80 (02) 146-151
  • 10 Tan BK, Chandra RK. Postoperative prevention and treatment of complications after sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010; 43 (04) 769-779
  • 11 Mascarenhas JG, da Fonseca VMG, Chen VG. et al. Resultados em longo prazo da cirurgia endoscópica nasossinusal no tratamento da rinossinusite crônica com e sem pólipos nasais. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2013; 79 (03) 306-311
  • 12 Zanuncio AV, Crosara PFTB, Becker HMG, Becker CG, Guimarães Rdos S. Setting of an endoscopic nasal reference point for surgical access to the anterior base through an anatomical study on cadavers. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2016; 82 (06) 630-635
  • 13 Menz HB, Latt MD, Tiedemann A, Mun San Kwan M, Lord SR. Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait Posture 2004; 20 (01) 20-25
  • 14 Jones TM, Almahdi JMD, Bhalla RK, Lewis-Jones H, Swift AC. The radiological anatomy of the anterior skull base. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002; 27 (02) 101-105
  • 15 Musy PY, Kountakis SE. Anatomic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2004; 25 (06) 418-422
  • 16 Casler JD, Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (01) 16-24
  • 17 Lubbe D, Semple P, Fagan J. Advances in endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery. S Afr Med J 2008; 98 (08) 623-625
  • 18 Ribeiro BNF, Muniz BC, Marchiori E. Preoperative computed tomography evaluation of the paranasal sinuses: what should the physician know? - pictorial essay. Radiol Bras 2019; 52 (02) 117-122