Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-100915
Use of Amniotic Membrane for Covering Large Oral Mucosal Defects during Socket Reconstruction Procedures
Verwendung der Amnionmembran zur Deckung der wichtigsten mündlichen Schleimhautdefizite während HohlraumrekonstruktionsoperationenPublication History
received 20 September 2017
accepted 16 December 2017
Publication Date:
18 April 2018 (online)
Background
The oral mucosal graft is often used for socket reconstruction [1], [2]. This procedure could be very painful during the postoperative period because of the exposure [3], [4]. A primary closure with direct sutures is sometimes impossible because of the size of the defect. Oral mucosal epithelium is a non-keratinized stratified squamous avascular epithelium that is supported by a dense collagenous layer of lamina propria [4]. An oral mucosal graft serving as a free graft for ocular surface reconstruction offers several advantages, such as easy tissue access and tissue harvesting, excellent tissue properties, adequate tissue availability, and complementary immunological properties, and it often resists contracture formation and integrates well to a moist ocular surface environment [5], [6]. These features make it a good alternative tissue source for ocular surface reconstruction.
However, the problem of restriction of the mouth opening and pain at the level of the buccal mucosa remains a very important challenge in the postoperative period [7]. In this article, we discuss the use of amniotic membranes to replace the mucosal defect in order to improve postoperative conditions, such as pain reduction and more rapid healing, for the patients.
-
References
- 1 Molgat YM, Hurwitz JJ, Webb MC. Buccal mucous membrane-fat graft in the management of the contracted socket. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 9: 267-272
- 2 Bowen Jones EJ, Nunes E. The outcome of oral mucosal grafts to the orbit: a three-and-a-half-year study. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55: 100-104
- 3 Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int 2004; 94: 867-869
- 4 Markiewicz MR, Lukose MA, Margarone 3rd JE. et al. The oral mucosa graft: a systematic review. J Urol 2007; 165: 1131-1134
- 5 Eppley BL, Keating M, Rink RA. A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction. J Urol 1997; 157: 1268-1270
- 6 Mahdavi ZR, Yazdani KM, Arab D. et al. Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using buccal mucosa in extensive anterior urethral strictures. Urology 2006; 68: 247-248
- 7 Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Gaffi M. et al. Buccal mucosa urethroplasty in the treatment of bulbar urethral strictures. Urology 2003; 61: 1008-1010
- 8 Eppley BL, Keating M, Rink R. A buccal mucosal harvesting technique for urethral reconstruction. J Urol 1997; 157: 1268-1270
- 9 Kane CJ, Tarman GJ, Summerton DJ. et al. Multi-institutional experience with buccal mucosa onlay urethroplasty for bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2002; 167: 1314-1317
- 10 Tolstunov L, Pogrel A, McAninch JW. Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84: 480-482