RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779052
Triple-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical and epidemiological characteristics
Miastenia gravis triplo-soronegativa: características clínicas e epidemiológicasAutor*innen
Abstract
Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease usually caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR-Abs), muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK-Abs), or low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4-Abs). However, there are MG patients who do not have these antibodies and are thus said to have triple-seronegative (triple-SN) MG.
Objective This study aims to describe the frequency and clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with triple-SN MG.
Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out through the analysis of medical records. Descriptive and analytical statistical analysis was performed comparing subgroups of myasthenic patients, classified according to serological profile.
Results The sample population consisted of 93 MG patients: 85 were positive for antibodies, 80 (86%) with AChR-Abs, 5 (5.4%) with MuSK-Abs, and no MG patients with LRP4-Abs. Eight patients (8.6%) had triple-SN MG; they had a median age at disease onset of 30 years (21-45). Their most common initial symptoms were ptosis, diplopia, and generalized weakness. Most patients presented with mild symptoms at their last visit, reflecting a median MG composite scale score of 4 (0-6), and 75% of patients had an adequate response to treatment.
Conclusion Our study showed a low frequency of triple-SN MG in Brazilian MG patients. Triple-SN MG was predominant in females, who presented with ptosis, diplopia, and generalized weakness, and most patients had an adequate response to immunosuppressive treatment. There was no significant difference between triple-SN MG and the other subgroups.
Resumo
Antecedentes A Miastenia gravis (MG) é uma desordem autoimune geralmente causada por anticorpos antirreceptores de acetilcolina (anti-RACh), tirosina quinase músculo-específica (anti-MuSK) ou proteína 4 relacionada ao receptor de lipoproteína de baixa densidade (anti-LRP4). No entanto, em uma parcela dos pacientes, nenhum destes três anticorpos pôde ser detectado, sendo estes casos denominados “triplo-soronegativos”.
Objetivo Descrever a frequência, bem como as características clínicas e epidemiológicas dos pacientes com MG triplo-soronegativa.
Métodos Consiste em um estudo transversal e restrospectivo, realizado através da análise de prontuários médicos. Foi realizada análise estatística descritiva e analítica entre os subgrupos de pacientes, classificados de acordo com o perfil sorológico.
Resultados A população consistiu de 93 pacientes com MG: 85 pacientes apresentavam positividade para anticorpos, sendo 80 (86%) com anticorpos anti-RACh, cinco (5,4%) com anti-MuSK, e não foram encontrados pacientes com anti-LRP4. Oito (8,6%) eram pacientes triplo-soronegativos, que apresentaram idade média de início da doença de 30 anos (21-45), e com sintomas iniciais mais comuns de ptose, diplopia e fraqueza generalizada. 75% dos pacientes triplo-soronegativos apresentaram resposta adequada ao tratamento.
Conclusão O estudo demonstrou uma baixa frequência da pacientes com MG triplo-soronegativa na população brasileira. A MG triplo-soronegativa foi predominante nas mulheres, que se apresentaram com ptose, diplopia ou fraqueza generalizada, e a maioria dos pacientes apresentou resposta adequada ao tratamento imunossupressor. Não houve diferença significativa entre a MG triplo-soronegativa e os demais subgrupos.
Authors' Contributions
PRVPR: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, software, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing; CSKK, RDPD data curation, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing; MATU: formal analysis, software, writing – review and editing; OJHF, LCW, PJL: data curation, supervision, validation, writing – review and editing; RHS: conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, resources, investigation, methodology, supervision, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.
Support
The genetic analysis (NGS) was partially supported by UFPR, PTC Therapeutics Brazil and Invitae Corporation.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 26. April 2023
Angenommen: 04. Oktober 2023
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Februar 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
Paula Raquel do Vale Pascoal Rodrigues, Cláudia Suemi Kamoi Kay, Renata Dal-Pra Ducci, Marco Antonio Takashi Utiumi, Otto Jesus Hernandez Fustes, Lineu Cesar Werneck, Paulo José Lorenzoni, Rosana Herminia Scola. Triple-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical and epidemiological characteristics. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2024; 82: s00441779052.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1779052
-
References
- 1 Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ. Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 212
- 2 Gilhus NE, Skeie GO, Romi F, Lazaridis K, Zisimopoulou P, Tzartos S. Myasthenia gravis - autoantibody characteristics and their implications for therapy. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12 (05) 259-268
- 3 Koneczny I, Herbst R. Myasthenia Gravis: Pathogenic Effects of Autoantibodies on Neuromuscular Architecture. Cells 2019; 8 (07) 671
- 4 Berrih-Aknin S, Frenkian-Cuvelier M, Eymard B. Diagnostic and clinical classification of autoimmune myasthenia gravis. J Autoimmun 2014; 48-49: 143-148
- 5 Cavalcante P, Bernasconi P, Mantegazza R. Autoimmune mechanisms in myasthenia gravis. Curr Opin Neurol 2012; 25 (05) 621-629
- 6 Zisimopoulou P, Evangelakou P, Tzartos J. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of anti-LRP4 in myasthenia gravis. J Autoimmun 2014; 52: 139-145
- 7 Zhang B, Shen C, Bealmear B. et al. Autoantibodies to agrin in myasthenia gravis patients. PLoS One 2014; 9 (03) e91816
- 8 Stergiou C, Lazaridis K, Zouvelou V. et al. Titin antibodies in “seronegative” myasthenia gravis–A new role for an old antigen. J Neuroimmunol 2016; 292: 108-115
- 9 Tozawa T, Nishimura A, Ueno T. et al. A 5-Year Follow-Up of Triple-Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis Successfully Treated with Tacrolimus Therapy. Neuropediatrics 2018; 49 (03) 200-203
- 10 Pasnoor M, Dimachkie MM, Farmakidis C, Barohn RJ. Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis. Neurol Clin 2018; 36 (02) 261-274
- 11 Burns TM, Conaway M, Sanders DBMG. MG Composite and MG-QOL15 Study Group. The MG Composite: A valid and reliable outcome measure for myasthenia gravis. Neurology 2010; 74 (18) 1434-1440
- 12 Sanders DB, Wolfe GI, Benatar M. et al. International consensus guidance for management of myasthenia gravis: Executive summary. Neurology 2016; 87 (04) 419-425
- 13 Heinze G. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Stat Med 2006; 25 (24) 4216-4226
- 14 Cortés-Vicente E, Gallardo E, Martínez MÁ. et al. Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Double-Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis and Antibodies to Cortactin. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73 (09) 1099-1104
- 15 Romi F, Hong Y, Gilhus NE. Pathophysiology and immunological profile of myasthenia gravis and its subgroups. Curr Opin Immunol 2017; 49: 9-13
- 16 Li Y, Peng Y, Yang H. Serological diagnosis of myasthenia gravis and its clinical significance. Ann Transl Med 2023; 11 (07) 290
- 17 Pevzner A, Schoser B, Peters K. et al. Anti-LRP4 autoantibodies in AChR- and MuSK-antibody-negative myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 2012; 259 (03) 427-435
- 18 Werneck LC, Lorenzoni PJ, Arndt RC, Kay CS, Scola RH. The immunogenetics of multiple sclerosis. The frequency of HLA-alleles class 1 and 2 is lower in Southern Brazil than in the European population. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2016; 74 (08) 607-616 . Doi: 10.1590/0004-282. Doi: × 20160100
- 19 Rivner MH, Quarles BM, Pan JX. et al. Clinical features of LRP4/agrin-antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: A multicenter study. Muscle Nerve 2020; 62 (03) 333-343
- 20 Deymeer F, Gungor-Tuncer O, Yilmaz V. et al. Clinical comparison of anti-MuSK- vs anti-AChR-positive and seronegative myasthenia gravis. Neurology 2007; 68 (08) 609-611
- 21 Huda S, Woodhall MR, Vincent A, Heckmann JM. Characteristics Of acetylcholine-receptor-antibody-negative myasthenia gravis in a South African cohort. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54 (06) 1023-1029
- 22 Hehir MK, Silvestri NJ. Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Classification, Clinical Presentation, Natural History, and Epidemiology. Neurol Clin 2018; 36 (02) 253-260
- 23 Evoli A, Tonali PA, Padua L. et al. Clinical correlates with anti-MuSK antibodies in generalized seronegative myasthenia gravis. Brain 2003; 126 (Pt 10): 2304-2311
- 24 Pasnoor M, Wolfe GI, Nations S. et al. Clinical findings in MuSK-antibody positive myasthenia gravis: a U.S. experience. Muscle Nerve 2010; 41 (03) 370-374
- 25 Sanders DB, El-Salem K, Massey JM, McConville J, Vincent A. Clinical aspects of MuSK antibody positive seronegative MG. Neurology 2003; 60 (12) 1978-1980
- 26 Morren J, Li Y. Myasthenia gravis with muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies: A narrative review. Muscle Nerve 2018; 58 (03) 344-358
- 27 Rodolico C, Bonanno C, Toscano A, Vita G. MuSK-Associated Myasthenia Gravis: Clinical Features and Management. Front Neurol 2020; 11: 660
- 28 Hong Y, Zisimopoulou P, Trakas N. et al. Multiple antibody detection in 'seronegative' myasthenia gravis patients. Eur J Neurol 2017; 24 (06) 844-850
- 29 Bacchi S, Kramer P, Chalk C. Autoantibodies to Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 4 in Double Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review. Can J Neurol Sci 2018; 45 (01) 62-67
- 30 Gilhus NE, Nacu A, Andersen JB, Owe JF. Myasthenia gravis and risks for comorbidity. Eur J Neurol 2015; 22 (01) 17-23
- 31 Ramanujam R, Piehl F, Pirskanen R, Gregersen PK, Hammarström L. Concomitant autoimmunity in myasthenia gravis–lack of association with IgA deficiency. J Neuroimmunol 2011; 236 (1-2): 118-122
- 32 Mao ZF, Yang LX, Mo XA. et al. Frequency of autoimmune diseases in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review. Int J Neurosci 2011; 121 (03) 121-129
- 33 Evoli A. Myasthenia gravis: new developments in research and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 2017; 30 (05) 464-470
- 34 Hoffmann S, Harms L, Schuelke M. et al. Complement deposition at the neuromuscular junction in seronegative myasthenia gravis. Acta Neuropathol 2020; 139 (06) 1119-1122
- 35 Zoltowska Katarzyna M, Belaya K, Leite M, Patrick W, Vincent A, Beeson D. Collagen Q–a potential target for autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Sci 2015; 348 (1-2): 241-244
- 36 Yan M, Liu Z, Fei E. et al. Induction of Anti-agrin Antibodies Causes Myasthenia Gravis in Mice. Neuroscience 2018; 373: 113-121
- 37 Romi F, Suzuki S, Suzuki N, Petzold A, Plant GT, Gilhus NE. Anti-voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.4 antibodies in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 2012; 259 (07) 1312-1316
- 38 Gallardo E, Martínez-Hernández E, Titulaer MJ. et al. Cortactin autoantibodies in myasthenia gravis. Autoimmun Rev 2014; 13 (10) 1003-1007
- 39 Devic P, Petiot P, Simonet T. et al. Antibodies to clustered acetylcholine receptor: expanding the phenotype. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21 (01) 130-134
