The History of Diagnosing Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract

An accurate and prompt diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism is important to prevent serious complications and mortality. Because the clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often nonspecific, objective testing by means of radiological imaging is required to confirm the diagnosis. Historically, a diagnosis of VTE involved invasive imaging techniques like contrast venography or conventional pulmonary angiography. Technological developments toward more accurate and less invasive diagnostics have driven the implementation of a variety of newer technologies over the past decades, as well as the derivation and validation of clinical decision rules (CDRs) that can be used to rule out VTE in combination with D-dimer blood tests. In this narrative review, we provide a historical overview of the most notable developments in the imaging techniques and CDRs for VTE diagnosis.

Keywords

venous thromboembolism - deep vein thrombosis - pulmonary embolism - radiology - diagnosis - algorithm - historical

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Februar 2024

• References

• 1 Berberich J, Hirsch S. Die Röntgenographische Darstellung der Arterien und Venen am Lebenden Menschen. Klin Wochenschr 1923; 2: 2226-2228
• 2 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg 1972; 104 (02) 134-144
• 3 Kahn SR. The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: integrating incidence, risk factors, and symptoms and signs. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158 (21) 2315-2323
• 4 Allen AW, Linton RR, Donaldson GA. Thrombosis and embolism: review of 202 patients treated by femoral vein interruption. Ann Surg 1943; 118 (04) 728-740
• 5 Barnett AJ. Venous occlusion plethysmography: a critical study. Med J Aust 1950; 2 (23) 818-823
• 6 Hirsh J, Hull RD, Raskob GE. Clinical features and diagnosis of venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8 (6, Suppl B): 114B-127B
• 7 Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C, Clarke MB. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1969; 2 (7614): 230-232
• 8 Moser KM, LeMoine JR. Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis?. Ann Intern Med 1981; 94 (4 pt 1): 439-444
• 9 Philbrick JT, Becker DM. Calf deep venous thrombosis. A wolf in sheep's clothing?. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148 (10) 2131-2138
• 10 Talbot SR. Use of real-time imaging in identifying deep venous obstruction: a preliminary report. Bruit 1982; 6: 41
• 11 Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D. et al. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320 (06) 342-345
• 12 Raghavendra BN, Horii SC, Hilton S, Subramanyam BR, Rosen RJ, Lam S. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by probe compression of veins. J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5 (02) 89-95
• 13 Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL. et al; American Thoracic Society. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 160 (03) 1043-1066
• 14 Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE. Trends in the use of diagnostic imaging in patients hospitalized with acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93 (10) 1316-1317
• 15 Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Thromboembolic disease detection at indirect CT venography versus CT pulmonary angiography. Radiology 2005; 234 (02) 591-594
• 16 Ghaye B, Nchimi A, Noukoua CT, Dondelinger RF. Does multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography reduce the incremental value of indirect CT venography compared with single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography?. Radiology 2006; 240 (01) 256-262
• 17 Goodman LR, Sostman HD, Stein PD, Woodard PK. CT venography: a necessary adjunct to CT pulmonary angiography or a waste of time, money, and radiation?. Radiology 2009; 250 (02) 327-330
• 18 Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelson MH. et al. 1992 ARRS Executive Council Award. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161 (01) 131-139
• 19 Moody AR, Pollock JG, O'Connor AR, Bagnall M. Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: direct MR imaging of the thrombus. Radiology 1998; 209 (02) 349-355
• 20 Cronan JJ, Leen V. Recurrent deep venous thrombosis: limitations of US. Radiology 1989; 170 (3 Pt 1): 739-742
• 21 Erdman WA, Jayson HT, Redman HC, Miller GL, Parkey RW, Peshock RW. Deep venous thrombosis of extremities: role of MR imaging in the diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 174 (02) 425-431
• 22 Moody AR. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (07) 1403-1409
• 23 Dronkers CE, Klok FA, Huisman MV. Current and future perspectives in imaging of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (09) 1696-1710
• 24 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (04) 543-603
• 25 Mazzolai L, Aboyans V, Ageno W. et al. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: a joint consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology working groups of aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function. Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (47) 4208-4218
• 26 van Dam LF, Dronkers CEA, Gautam G. et al; Theia Study Group. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. Blood 2020; 135 (16) 1377-1385
• 27 van Dam LF, van den Hout WB, Gautam G. et al. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (05) 1369-1378
• 28 Tan M, Mol GC, van Rooden CJ. et al. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging differentiates acute recurrent ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis from residual thrombosis. Blood 2014; 124 (04) 623-627
• 29 Gautam G, Sebastian T, Klok FA. How to differentiate recurrent deep vein thrombosis from postthrombotic syndrome. Hamostaseologie 2020; 40 (03) 280-291
• 30 Dronkers CE, Srámek A, Huisman MV, Klok FA. Accurate diagnosis of iliac vein thrombosis in pregnancy with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI). BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: bcr2016218091
• 31 Brighton T, Janssen J, Butler SP. Aging of acute deep vein thrombosis measured by radiolabeled 99mTc-rt-PA. J Nucl Med 2007; 48 (06) 873-878
• 32 Rondina MT, Lam UT, Pendleton RC. et al. (18)F-FDG PET in the evaluation of acuity of deep vein thrombosis. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37 (12) 1139-1145
• 33 Santini P, Esposto G, Ainora ME. et al. Ultrasound elastography to assess age of deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (12) 2075
• 34 Huisman MV, Barco S, Cannegieter SC. et al. Pulmonary embolism. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018; 4: 18028
• 35 den Exter PL, van Es J, Erkens PM. et al. Impact of delay in clinical presentation on the diagnostic management and prognosis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187 (12) 1369-1373
• 36 Modan B, Sharon E, Jelin N. Factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease. Chest 1972; 62 (04) 388-393
• 37 Huisman MV, Klok FA. How I diagnose acute pulmonary embolism. Blood 2013; 121 (22) 4443-4448
• 38 Huisman MV, Klok FA. Diagnostic management of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (03) 412-422
• 39 Robb GP, Steinberg I. Visualization of the chambers of the heart, the pulmonary circulation, and the great blood vessels in man. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1939; 41: 1-17
• 40 Quinn III JL, Whitley JE, Hudspeth AS, Prichard RW. Early clinical applications of lung scintiscanning. Radiology 1964; 82 (02) 315-317
• 41 Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE. et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. J Nucl Med 1993; 34 (07) 1119-1126
• 42 PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 1990; 263 (20) 2753-2759
• 43 Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR. et al; PIOPED II Investigators. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006; 354 (22) 2317-2327
• 44 Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE. et al; PIOPED III (Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis III) Investigators. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010; 152 (07) 434-443 , W142-3
• 45 Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Sostman HD. et al. Methods of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis III (PIOPED III). Semin Nucl Med 2008; 38 (06) 462-470
• 46 Revel MP, Sanchez O, Couchon S. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: results of the ‘IRM-EP’ study. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10 (05) 743-750
• 47 Klok FA, Mos IC, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Huisman MV. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography as a single imaging test to rule out pulmonary embolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2011; 17 (05) 380-386
• 48 Moores L, Kline J, Portillo AK. et al. Multidetector computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in patients with a high clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (01) 114-120
• 49 Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR. et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2007; 245 (02) 315-329
• 50 Kooiman J, Klok FA, Mos IC. et al. Incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy following CT-angiography for clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8 (02) 409-411
• 51 Swan D, Hitchen S, Klok FA, Thachil J. The problem of under-diagnosis and over-diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2019; 177: 122-129
• 52 Le Gal G, Kovacs MJ, Bertoletti L. et al; SSPE Investigators. Risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with subsegmental pulmonary embolism managed without anticoagulation: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175 (01) 29-35
• 53 den Exter PL, van Es J, Klok FA. et al. Risk profile and clinical outcome of symptomatic subsegmental acute pulmonary embolism. Blood 2013; 122 (07) 1144-1149 , quiz 1329
• 54 den Exter PL, Kroft LJM, Gonsalves C. et al. Establishing diagnostic criteria and treatment of subsegmental pulmonary embolism: a Delphi analysis of experts. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2020; 4 (08) 1251-1261
• 55 Carrier M, Klok FA. Symptomatic subsegmental pulmonary embolism: to treat or not to treat?. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2017; 2017 (01) 237-241
• 56 van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM. et al; Artemis Study Investigators. Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (12) 1139-1149
• 57 van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S. et al; YEARS study group. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet 2017; 390 (10091): 289-297
• 58 Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL. et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA 2014; 311 (11) 1117-1124
• 59 Douma RA, Mos IC, Erkens PM. et al; Prometheus Study Group. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011; 154 (11) 709-718
• 60 van Es N, van der Hulle T, van Es J. et al. Wells rule and D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165 (04) 253-261
• 61 Stals MAM, Moumneh T, Ainle FN. et al. Noninvasive diagnostic work-up for suspected acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Thromb Haemost 2023; 21 (03) 606-615
• 62 Geersing GJ, Takada T, Klok FA. et al. Ruling out pulmonary embolism across different healthcare settings: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19 (01) e1003905
• 63 Tromeur C, van der Pol LM, Le Roux PY. et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica 2019; 104 (01) 176-188
• 64 Stals MAM, Takada T, Kraaijpoel N. et al. Safety and efficiency of diagnostic strategies for ruling out pulmonary embolism in clinically relevant patient subgroups: a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175 (02) 244-255
• 65 van der Pol LM, Bistervels IM, van Mens TE. et al. Lower prevalence of subsegmental pulmonary embolism after application of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm. Br J Haematol 2018; 183 (04) 629-635
• 66 van der Pol LM, Dronkers CEA, van der Hulle T. et al. The YEARS algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism: shorter visit time and reduced costs at the emergency department. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16 (04) 725-733
• 67 Ende-Verhaar YM, Meijboom LJ, Kroft LJM. et al. Usefulness of standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography performed for acute pulmonary embolism for identification of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results of the InShape III study. J Heart Lung Transplant 2019; 38 (07) 731-738
• 68 Braams NJ, Boon GJAM, de Man FS. et al. Evolution of CT findings after anticoagulant treatment for acute pulmonary embolism in patients with and without an ultimate diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2021; 58 (06) 2100699
• 69 Guérin L, Couturaud F, Parent F. et al. Prevalence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Prevalence of CTEPH after pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (03) 598-605
• 70 Humbert M, Kovacs G, Hoeper MM. et al; ESC/ERS Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 2022; 43 (38) 3618-3731
• 71 Delcroix M, Torbicki A, Gopalan D. et al. ERS statement on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2021; 57 (06) 2002828
• 72 Si-Mohamed SA, Miailhes J, Rodesch PA. et al. Spectral photon-counting CT technology in chest imaging. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (24) 5757
• 73 Landefeld CS, McGuire E, Cohen AM. Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: a basis for quantifying clinical judgment. Am J Med 1990; 88 (04) 382-388
• 74 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR. et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345 (8961): 1326-1330
• 75 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350 (9094): 1795-1798
• 76 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (13) 1227-1235
• 77 Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR. et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129 (12) 997-1005
• 78 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83 (03) 416-420
• 79 van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV. et al; Christopher Study Investigators. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 2006; 295 (02) 172-179
• 80 Gibson NS, Sohne M, Kruip MJ. et al; Christopher study investigators. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2008; 99 (01) 229-234
• 81 Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161 (01) 92-97
• 82 Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM. et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144 (03) 165-171
• 83 Klok FA, Mos IC, Nijkeuter M. et al. Simplification of the revised Geneva score for assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168 (19) 2131-2136
• 84 Kline JA, Nelson RD, Jackson RE, Courtney DM. Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39 (02) 144-152
• 85 Robert-Ebadi H, Mostaguir K, Hovens MM. et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: prospective validation of the simplified Geneva score. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (09) 1764-1769
• 86 Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S. et al; PEGeD Study Investigators. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (22) 2125-2134
• 87 Kline JA, Courtney DM, Kabrhel C. et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (05) 772-780
• 88 Roy PM, Friou E, Germeau B. et al. Derivation and validation of a 4-level clinical pretest probability score for suspected pulmonary embolism to safely decrease imaging testing. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 6 (06) 669-677
• 89 Grimm LJ, Manson W. Deep vein thrombosis bedside ultrasonography. 2021 Accessed October 1, 2023 at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1362989-overview