Clinical Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation of the Left Anterior Descending Artery in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Abstract

Introduction Breast cancer is a prevalent global disease, and radiotherapy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, radiotherapy may lead to cardiac complications, particularly in patients receiving left-sided radiotherapy who may experience increased risks due to toxicity in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. The manual contouring of the LAD artery is time-consuming and subject to variability. This study aimed to provide an overview of artificial intelligence (AI) based LAD artery contouring, assess its feasibility, and identify its limitations.

Objectives The primary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of AI-based LAD artery contouring, compare different approaches, and quantify properties impacting accuracy. The secondary objective was to recommend algorithms with greater accuracy.

Materials and Methods A (noncontrast) computed tomography dataset of nine patients with breast cancer was used to analyze the features and behavior of the LAD artery. The functioning of different AI models used for autosegmentation was studied, and the LAD artery imaging features were identified and quantified using the widely used AI models. Additionally, an algorithm to reliably compute interpatient variability in the LAD artery contours was proposed.

Results A lack of distinctive features, diminutive contour size (∼5 pixels on average), and inconsistent position of the LAD artery were observed. The interpatient variability in the LAD artery contours was five to seven times the average size of the contours. The dataset also had a high standard deviation of 28.9 and skewed data distribution.

Conclusions The results indicated that the variable path of the LAD artery and high interpatient variability were the primary reasons for the inability of AI algorithms to have a concordance. Further, the small contour size amplified model inaccuracy. For higher autosegmentation accuracy, an anatomical landmark–based approach is necessary to capture surrounding structures that affect the path of the LAD artery.

Keywords

breast cancer radiotherapy - autosegmentation - left anterior descending artery contouring - left anterior descending artery sparing - clinical feasibility - artificial intelligence–based contouring

Patient Consent

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. Februar 2024

• References

• 1 World Health Organization. . Breast Cancer. 2021 . Accessed June 17, 2023 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer#:∼:text=Scope%20of%20the%20problem,the%20world's%20most%20prevalent%20cancer
• 2 Cheng YJ, Nie XY, Ji CC. et al. Long-term cardiovascular risk after radiotherapy in women with breast cancer. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6 (05) e005633
• 3 Feng M, Moran JM, Koelling T. et al. Development and validation of a heart atlas to study cardiac exposure to radiation following treatment for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79 (01) 10-18
• 4 Marin T, Zhuo Y, Lahoud RM. et al. Deep learning-based GTV contouring modeling inter- and intra- observer variability in sarcomas. Radiother Oncol 2022; 167: 269-276
• 5 Chung SY, Chang JS, Choi MS. et al. Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16 (01) 44
• 6 Shen J, Gu P, Wang Y, Wang Z. Advances in automatic delineation of target volume and cardiac substructure in breast cancer radiotherapy (review). Oncol Lett 2023; 25 (03) 110
• 7 Loap P, Tkatchenko N, Kirova Y. Evaluation of a delineation software for cardiac atlas-based autosegmentation: an example of the use of artificial intelligence in modern radiotherapy. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24 (08) 826-833
• 8 Gibbons E, Hoffmann M, Westhuyzen J, Hodgson A, Chick B, Last A. Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for critical organs at risk in radiation therapy. J Med Radiat Sci 2023; 70 (Suppl. 02) 15-25
• 9 Pydicom. User Guide pydicom User Guide: pydicom 2.4.1 documentation. . Accessed June 17, 2023 at: https://pydicom.github.io/pydicom/stable/old/pydicom_user_guide.html
• 10 Turgutlu K. Debut: dicom-contour. 2018 . Accessed June 17, 2023 at: https://medium.com/@keremturgutlu/debut-dicom-contour-9ce74326bdbe
• 11 Fu Y, Lei Y, Wang T, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation. Phys Med 2021; 85: 107-122
• 12 Schipaanboord B, Boukerroui D, Peressutti D. et al. An evaluation of atlas selection methods for atlas-based automatic segmentation in radiotherapy treatment planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019; 38 (11) 2654-2664
• 13 University of Nevada, Reno. Corner Detection. Point Detection. Accessed June 17, 2023 at: https://www.cse.unr.edu/∼bebis/CS791E/Notes/CornerDetection.pdf
• 14 van den Bogaard VAB, van Dijk LV, Vliegenthart R. et al. Development and evaluation of an auto-segmentation tool for the left anterior descending coronary artery of breast cancer patients based on anatomical landmarks. Radiother Oncol 2019; 136: 15-20
• 15 Kumar V, Lal T, Dhuliya P, Pant D. A study and comparison of different image segmentation algorithms. Presented at: 2016 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computing,. Communication, & Automation (ICACCA); Bareilly, India; 2016: 1-6
• 16 Paul S. Towards preventing overfitting. DataCamp. 2018 . Accessed October 4, 2023 at: https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/towards-preventing-overfitting-regularization
• 17 Díaz-Gavela AA, Figueiras-Graillet L, Luis ÁM. et al. Breast radiotherapy-related cardiotoxicity. when, how, why. Risk prevention and control strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (07) 1712