Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(04): 1101-1106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782214
Original Article

Influence of Different Apical Foramen Morphologies on the Accuracy of Four Electronic Foramen Locators

Renan D. Furlan
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Murilo P. Alcalde
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Rodrigo R. Vivan
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Michel E. Klymus
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Ana G.S. Limoeiro
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Marco A.H. Duarte
1   Department of Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
,
Bruno C. de Vasconcelos 
2   Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Pharmacy, Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
3   School of Dentistry of Sobral, Federal University of Ceará, Campus Sobral, Sobral, CE, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Root ZX II (RZX), Raypex 6 (RAY), EPex Pro (EPEX), and CanalPro (CNP) electronic foramen locators (EFLs) in different foraminal morphologies (fully formed foramen, immature foramen with parallel walls, and immature foramen with divergent walls); this article also evaluated the influence of different penetration levels (0.0 mm and −1.0 mm).

Materials and Methods Thirty single-rooted human premolars were accessed and had their cervical/middle thirds prepared with SX ProTaper files. The apical foramens (AF) were standardized to 250 µm and the initial root canal length (RCL1) was measured under 16x magnification with aid of a digital caliper. Using the alginate model, electronic measurements (EM) were taken 1.0 mm up to AF (EM1/-1) and at AF (EM1/0), always using adjusted hand K-files. The root apexes were then cross-sectioned 3.0 mm from the foramen; then, new RCL (RCL2) and electronic measurements were performed (EM2/-1 and EM2/0.0). Finally, retropreparations were performed with instruments SX ProTaper files introduced 4.0 mm in the apicocervical direction. Then new RCL (RCL3) and electronic measurements (EM3/-1 and EM3/0) were performed.

Statistical Analysis Values were tabulated and tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test, which yielded nonparametric distributions of the data. Data were subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests to estimate possible differences between devices as a function of foramen morphology and/or apical limit. The significance level was set at 5.0%.

Results In general, the EFLs were accurate in determining the RCL. Statistically significant differences were observed between EPEX and RAY at 0.0, when measuring the divergent AF canals (p < 0.05). Regarding the different foramen morphologies in each EFL, RZX and EPEX showed no interference (p > 0.05), whereas RAY and CNP had lower accuracy levels at 0.0 with divergent AF (p < 0.05).

Conclusion The four devices evaluated are accurate to determine the RCL in the conditions tested. The apical limit of penetration did not have significant influence on their accuracy. Conversely, the presence of divergence in the AF walls negatively influenced de RAY and CNP precisions at the foraminal level.

Keywords

electronic foramen locator - endodontic - root canal length


Publication History

Article published online:
02 May 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Tavares KIMC, Pinto JC, Santos-Junior AO, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effect of additional apical preparation on retreatment of curved root canals filled with different sealers. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (03) 636-641
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Mousavi SA, Farhad A, Shahnaseri S, Basiri A, Kolahdouzan E. Comparative evaluation of apical constriction position in incisor and molar teeth: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent 2018; 12 (02) 237-241
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Marigo L, Gervasi GL, Somma F, Squeo G, Castagnola R. Comparison of two electronic apex locators on human cadavers. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (07) 1547-1550
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Oliveira TN, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Bernardes RA, Vivan RR, Duarte MAH, Vasconcelos BC. Determination of the accuracy of 5 electronic apex locators in the function of different employment protocols. J Endod 2017; 43 (10) 1663-1667
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Saxena D, Saha SG, Bharadwaj A, Vijaywargiya N, Dubey S, Kala S. A comparative evaluation of accuracy of three electronic apex locators using histological section as gold standard: an ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20 (04) 251-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Vasconcelos BC, Bueno Mde M, Luna-Cruz SM, Duarte MAH, Fernandes Cde O. Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21 (02) 132-137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 de Vasconcelos BC, do Vale TM, de Menezes AST. et al. An ex vivo comparison of root canal length determination by three electronic apex locators at positions short of the apical foramen. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110 (02) e57-e61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Vasconcelos BC, Matos Lde A, Pinheiro-Júnior EC, Menezes AS, Vivacqua-Gomes N. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators using different apical file sizes. Braz Dent J 2012; 23 (03) 199-204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 de Vasconcelos BC, Veríssimo Chaves RD, Vivacqua-Gomes N. et al. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of electronic foramen locators in root canals with an obstructed apical foramen. J Endod 2015; 41 (09) 1551-1554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J 2006; 39 (08) 595-609
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Connert T, Judenhofer MS, Hülber-J M. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of nine electronic apex locators by using Micro-CT. Int Endod J 2018; 51 (02) 223-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Piasecki L, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX. et al. The use of micro-computed tomography to determine the accuracy of 2 electronic apex locators and anatomic variations affecting their precision. J Endod 2016; 42 (08) 1263-1267
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 de Camargo EJ, Zapata RO, Medeiros PL. et al. Influence of preflaring on the accuracy of length determination with four electronic apex locators. J Endod 2009; 35 (09) 1300-1302
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Iparraguirre Nuñovero MF, Piasecki L, Segato AVK, Westphalen VPD, Silva Neto UX, Carneiro E. A laboratory study of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators: influence of embedding media and radiographic assessment of the electronic apical limit. Int Endod J 2021; 54 (07) 1200-1206
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Haupt F, Hülsmann M. Consistency of electronic measurements of endodontic working length when using multiple devices from the same manufacturer-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (09) 3107-3112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Saraf PA, Ratnakar P, Patil TN, Penukonda R, Kamatagi L, Vanaki SS. A comparative clinical evaluation of accuracy of six apex locators with intraoral periapical radiograph in multirooted teeth: an in vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2017; 20 (04) 264-268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kim YJA, Chandler NP. Determination of working length for teeth with wide or immature apices: a review. Int Endod J 2013; 46 (06) 483-491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J 2007; 33 (01) 7-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Akisue E, Gratieri SD, Barletta FB, Caldeira CL, Grazziotin-Soares R, Gavini G. Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: an in vitro comparison of 5 brands. J Endod 2014; 40 (01) 109-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ahmad IA, Pani SC. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in primary teeth: a meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (03) 298-307
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kumar LV, Sreelakshmi N, Reddy ER, Manjula M, Rani ST, Rajesh A. Clinical evaluation of conventional radiography, radiovisiography, and an electronic apex locator in determining the working length in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2016; 38 (01) 37-41
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar