Combined Intramedullary Pinning for the Stabilisation of Distal Diaphyseal and Metaphyseal Femoral Fractures in Five Skeletally Immature Dogs

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective case series was to evaluate outcomes of distal normograde intramedullary pinning combined with dynamic intramedullary pinning for the stabilisation of distal diaphyseal and metaphyseal femoral fractures in five juvenile dogs. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to evaluate signalment, interval from injury to surgery, fracture classification, concurrent injuries, apparatus, fracture healing and any complications. Final follow-up at skeletal maturity consisted of orthopaedic examination and orthogonal radiographs of bilateral femurs. Radiographs were evaluated for osteoarthritis, femoral length and alignment. Three of four dogs that returned for short-term follow-up healed without complication at 4 weeks postoperatively. One dog experienced pin migration and delayed union, requiring pin removal. All four dogs that returned for final follow-up demonstrated excellent limb function based on owner assessment and orthopaedic examination. Radiographic evaluation revealed mild stifle osteoarthritis in two dogs. All dogs demonstrated continued growth of the affected femur with mild discrepancies in length compared with the contralateral femur at skeletal maturity. Two dogs developed subclinical femoral neck retroversion relative to the normal contralateral limb. Combined intramedullary pinning may be an appropriate treatment option for select distal femoral fractures in skeletally immature dogs; however, more rigid fixation methods should be considered when possible, to effectively counter rotational forces during fracture healing.

Keywords

fracture - dogs - femur - pinning - skeletally immature

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Juni 2023

Angenommen: 01. Februar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. März 2024

• References

• 1 Braden TD, Eicker SW, Abdinoor D, Prieur WD. Characteristics of 1000 femur fractures in the dog and cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8 (04) 203-209
• 2 Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH, Heiple KG. Structural properties of immature canine bone. J Biomech Eng 1981; 103 (04) 232-238
• 3 Torzilli PA, Takebe K, Burstein AH, Zika JM, Heiple KG. The material properties of immature bone. J Biomech Eng 1982; 104 (01) 12-20
• 4 DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM, Schaefer SL. Fractures in growing animals. In: Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. eds. Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th edition. St Louis, MO:: Elsevier;; 2016: 781-790
• 5 Stigen O. Supracondylar femoral fractures in 159 dogs and cats treated using a normograde intramedullary pinning technique. J Small Anim Pract 1999; 40 (11) 519-523
• 6 Gibson KL. Stack pinning of long bone fractures: a retrospective study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1991; 4 (02) 48-53
• 7 Boekhout-Ta CL, Kim SE, Cross AR, Evans R, Pozzi A. Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-assisted percutaneous pinning of 42 physeal fractures in 37 dogs and 4 cats. Vet Surg 2017; 46 (01) 103-110
• 8 Whitney WO, Schrader SC. Dynamic intramedullary crosspinning technique for repair of distal femoral fractures in dogs and cats: 71 cases (1981-1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987; 191 (09) 1133-1138
• 9 DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM, Schaefer SL. Fractures: classification, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Piermattei DL, Flo GL, DeCamp CE. eds. Brinker, Piermattei and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th edition. St Louis, MO:: Elsevier; 2016: 95-105
• 10 Piermattei DL, Greely RG. The hindlimb: approach to the distal femur and stifle joint through a lateral incision. In: An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 4th ed. Philadelphia:: Saunders; 2004: 338-341
• 11 Petazzoni M, Jaeger GH. Radiographic measurements of the femur. . In: Atlas of Clinical Goniometry and Radiographic Measurements of the Canine Pelvic Limb. . 2nd edition. Milan: Merial; 2008: 34-55
• 12 Dijkman BG, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. When is a fracture healed? Radiographic and clinical criteria revisited. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (Suppl. 01) S76-S80
• 13 Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and joint orientation. In: Principles of deformity correction. Berlin DE:: Springer; 2002: 1-18
• 14 Tomlinson J, Fox D, Cook JL, Keller GG. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (06) 593-598
• 15 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 905-908
• 16 Riser WH. Growth and development of the normal canine pelvis, hip joints and femurs from birth to maturity: a radiographic study 1. Vet Radiol 1973; 14 (02) 24-34
• 17 Franczuszki D, Chalman JA, Butler HC, DeBowes RM, Leipold H. Postoperative effects of experimental femoral shortening in the mature dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1987; 23: 429-437
• 18 Campbell JR. The technique of fixation of fractures of the distal femur using Rush pins. J Small Anim Pract 1976; 17 (05) 323-329