CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2024; 18(04): 987-996
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782695
Review Article

Comparative Analysis of Coronal Sealing Materials in Endodontics: Exploring Non-Eugenol Zinc Oxide-Based versus Glass-Ionomer Cement Systems

Mohamed Hashim Alamin
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Sara Ayman Yaghi
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Abdullah Faris Al-Safi
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Wared R. Y. R. Bouresly
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Kausar Sadia Fakhruddin
2   Department of Orthodontics, Pediatric and Community Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
,
Lakshman Perera Samaranayake
3   Department of oral biosciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
4   Department of Periodontology, Chulalongkorn university, Bangkok, Thailand
,
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The proper closure of the access cavity between appointments during endodontic treatment is paramount and relies on temporary fillings. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of zinc oxide-based materials and glass-ionomer cement (GIC) as temporary coronal sealers after root canal treatment in extracted human teeth. Three databases were searched to identify randomized clinical trials that examined the sealing properties of various temporary sealing materials using dyes or stains as indicators. A total of seven in vitro studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were critically analyzed. These indicated significant variations in the relative sealing ability of the coronal breach of endodontically treated teeth, either by zinc oxide or GIC-based materials. While GIC-based material (e.g., Fuji IX and Fuji II) exhibited superior sealing of single-rooted teeth, zinc oxide-based material (e.g., Cavit, Coltosol, Caviton) also showed promising attributes. Resin-modified GIC formulations displayed enhanced physical properties, yet challenges related to adhesive failure and shrinkage during polymerization were observed. Zinc oxide-based materials have demonstrated superior coronal sealing effectiveness over certain GIC in controlled settings. Their premixed nature ensures consistent application and hygroscopic properties improve cavity sealing. However, the focus on dye penetration tests for microleakage in vitro may not fully represent the risk of bacterial infiltration. Thus, in vivo studies are crucial for validating these findings in clinical contexts.



Publication History

Article published online:
28 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent 2016; 10 (01) 144-147
  • 2 Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Recurrent apical periodontitis and late endodontic treatment failure related to coronal leakage: a case report. J Endod 2011; 37 (08) 1171-1175
  • 3 Balto H. An assessment of microbial coronal leakage of temporary filling materials in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002; 28 (11) 762-764
  • 4 Tennert C, Eismann M, Goetz F, Woelber JP, Hellwig E, Polydorou O. A temporary filling material used for coronal sealing during endodontic treatment may cause tooth fractures in large Class II cavities in vitro. Int Endod J 2015; 48 (01) 84-88
  • 5 Kelmendi T, Koçani F, Kurti A, Kamberi B, Kamberi A. Comparison of sealing abilities among zinc oxide eugenol root-canal filling cement, antibacterial bioceramic paste, and epoxy resin, using enterococcus faecalis as a microbial tracer. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 2022; 28: e936319
  • 6 Djouiai B, Wolf TG. Tooth and temporary filling material fractures caused by Cavit, Cavit W and Coltosol F: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2021; 21 (01) 74
  • 7 Tiwari S, Kenchappa M, Bhayya D. et al. Antibacterial activity and fluoride release of glass-ionomer cement, compomer and zirconia reinforced glass-ionomer cement. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (04) ZC90-ZC93
  • 8 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000097
  • 9 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009; 339: b2700
  • 10 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010; 8: 18
  • 11 Madarati A, Rekab MS, Watts DC, Qualtrough A. Time-dependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics. Aust Endod J 2008; 34 (03) 89-93
  • 12 Hajaj T, Perdiou A, Sinescu C. et al. Evaluation of different coronal sealing materials in the endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2021; 2021: 9977951
  • 13 Ciftçi A, Vardarli DA, Sönmez IS. Coronal microleakage of four endodontic temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108 (04) e67-e70
  • 14 Križnar I, Seme K, Fidler A. Bacterial microleakage of temporary filling materials used for endodontic access cavity sealing. J Dent Sci 2016; 11 (04) 394-400
  • 15 Milani S, Seraj B, Heidari A, Mirdamadi A, Shahrabi M. Coronal sealing capacity of temporary restorative materials in pediatric dentistry: a comparative study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017; 10 (02) 115-118
  • 16 Pieper CM, Zanchi CH, Rodrigues-Junior SA, Moraes RR, Pontes LS, Bueno M. Sealing ability, water sorption, solubility and toothbrushing abrasion resistance of temporary filling materials. Int Endod J 2009; 42 (10) 893-899
  • 17 Fierascu RC. Incorporation of nanomaterials in glass ionomer cements-recent developments and future perspectives: a narrative review. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2022; 12 (21) 12
  • 18 De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG. The use of glass ionomer cements in both conventional and surgical endodontics. Int Endod J 2004; 37 (02) 91-104
  • 19 Rêgo HMC, Butler S, Santos MJC. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of three resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022: 4690656
  • 20 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (03) 211-222
  • 21 Dioguardi M, Alovisi M, Sovereto D. et al. Sealing ability and microbial leakage of root-end filling materials: MTA versus epoxy resin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2021; 7 (07) e07494
  • 22 Peez R, Frank S. The physical-mechanical performance of the new Ketac Molar Easymix compared to commercially available glass ionomer restoratives. J Dent 2006; 34 (08) 582-587
  • 23 Arnold S, Buchanan GD, Warren N, Potgieter N. Comparison of capsule-mixed versus hand-mixed glass ionomer cements Part II: Porosity. S Afr Dent J 2022; 77: 65-72
  • 24 Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19 (06) 529-539
  • 25 Lopes LG, Franco EB, Pereira JC, Mondelli RF. Effect of light-curing units and activation mode on polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress of composite resins. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16 (01) 35-42
  • 26 Ozan G, Eren MM, Vatansever C, Erdemir U. Effect of surface sealant on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composites. Polym Polymer Compos 2021; 29: S475-S484
  • 27 Moura-Netto C, Guglielmi CdeA, Mello-Moura AC, Palo RM, Raggio DP, Caldeira CL. Nd:YAG laser irradiation effect on apical intracanal dentin - a microleakage and SEM evaluation. Braz Dent J 2011; 22 (05) 377-381
  • 28 Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'Sell C. Microleakage of Cavit, CavitW, CavitG and IRM by impedance spectroscopy. Int Endod J 1996; 29 (04) 256-261
  • 29 Tavares KIMC, Pinto JC, Santos-Junior AO, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effect of additional apical preparation on retreatment of curved root canals filled with different sealers. Eur J Dent 2023; 17 (03) 636-641