CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2025; 19(01): 048-054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786843
Original Article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation of The Indonesian Version Functional Assessment of Denture Instrument as a Measuring Tool for Complete Denture Functional Quality

Arrad Ibrahim Rambey
1   Prosthodontics Residency Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Nina Ariani
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Lindawati Soetanto Kusdhany
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Making good quality dentures is necessary to avoid patients' discomfort when adapting to new dentures. Several studies regarding the assessment of the quality of dentures have been carried out in many other countries, such as using the Functional Assessment of Dentures (FAD) by Anastassiadou. However, studies have yet to be conducted in Indonesia. This study aims to obtain a valid and reliable instrument to measure the quality of complete dentures (CDs). This study also aims to find out whether the functional quality of a CD measured with the Indonesian version of the FAD Instrument (PFGT) can affect patient satisfaction in receiving CD treatment (measured with Indonesian version of Patient's Denture Assessment [PDA-Id]) and to find contributing factors to the functional quality of a CD.

Materials and Methods The study was conducted in two stages. The first stage was a qualitative study using cross-cultural adaptation methods and focus group discussions with experts. The second stage was a quantitative test with a total of 40 subjects for statistical analysis in the form of a kappa test, test–retest, Kuder–Richardson (KR) 20, and a correlation test between PDA-Id and PFG. Multivariate analysis was done to analyze contributing factors to the functional quality of CD.

Results The final instrument was obtained from the qualitative test, which was tested for content and face validation. The interrater kappa test result of 0.828 shows an almost perfect agreement. The results of the intrarater test–retest (0.564; p > 0.05; intraclass correlation coefficient 0.889) showed excellent instrument stability. The results of the internal consistency test with Kuder–Richardson 20 (1.08; KR > 1) showed good internal consistency. The correlation test results between PFGT and PDA-Id (0.044; p < 0.05) showed a positive correlation. Multivariate analysis showed a relationship between the quality of the CD, the length of time the CD was used, and the patient's satisfaction with CD treatment.

Conclusion The PFGT instrument is considered a valid and reliable tool to measure the functional quality of a denture that can distinguish between good and bad quality.



Publication History

Article published online:
19 July 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, Feine JS. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent 2013; 2013: 498305
  • 2 Limpuangthip N, Somkotra T, Arksornnukit M. Modified retention and stability criteria for complete denture wearers: a risk assessment tool for impaired masticatory ability and oral health-related quality of life. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120 (01) 43-49
  • 3 Corrigan PJ, Basker RM, Farrin AJ, Mulley GP, Heath MR. The development of a method for functional assessment of dentures. Gerodontology 2002; 19 (01) 41-45
  • 4 Anastassiadou V, Naka O, Heath MR, Kapari D. Validation of indices for functional assessment of dentures. Gerodontology 2002; 19 (01) 46-52
  • 5 Georgiou M, Naka O, Anastassiadou V, Pissiotis A. The effect of denture adhesives on denture quality and occlusal force. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2023; 31 (03) 286-295
  • 6 Leles CR, Oliveira TMC, de Araújo SC, Nogueira TE, Schimmel M. Individual factors associated with masticatory performance of complete denture wearers: a cross-sectional study. J Oral Rehabil 2019; 46 (10) 903-911
  • 7 Cerutti-Kopplin D, Emami E, Hilgert JB, Hugo FN, Rivaldo E, Padilha DMP. Predictors of satisfaction with dentures in a cohort of individuals wearing old dentures: functional quality or patient-reported measures?. J Prosthodont 2017; 26 (03) 196-200
  • 8 Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Kaiba Y, Sato Y, Minakuchi S. Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures. BMC Oral Health 2014; 14 (01) 45
  • 9 Rezeki A, Koesmaningati H, Kusdhany L. Reliability and validity of an Indonesian version of the Patient's Denture Assessment (PDA): a self-assessment instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Int Dental Med Res 2017; 449-453
  • 10 Olawale OF, Ogunrinde TJ, Dosumu OO, Ajayi DM. The effect of ridge height on retention of acrylic and flexible dentures in patients with complete edentulous maxillary arch: a pilot study. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2022; 20 (02) 151-159
  • 11 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25 (24) 3186-3191
  • 12 Baker TL. Doing Social Research. 2nd ed. New York, United States: McGrawHill Inc.; 1994
  • 13 Oremus M, Oremus C, Hall GBC, McKinnon MC. ECT & Cognition Systematic Review Team. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. BMJ Open 2012; 2 (04) e001368
  • 14 Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 2018; 18 (03) 91-93
  • 15 Zarb G, Hobkirk J, Eckert S, Jacob R. The dentures polished surfaces, recording jaw relations, and their transfer to an articulator. In: Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. Vol. 13. 13th ed. St. Louis, Missouri, United States: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. :163, 175–193
  • 16 Yarlagadda S, Srinath HP, Prasad KS, Reddy AV. Difficult denture birds: an easy psychological assessment. J Orofac Res 2013; 3 (02) 102-105
  • 17 Venkatesan S, Krishnamoorthi D, Raju R, Mohan J, Thomas PA, Rubasree B. Evidence-based prosthodontics. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2022; 14 (Suppl. 01) S50-S59
  • 18 Ribeiro AKC, Veríssimo AH, de Medeiros AKB, Cardoso RG, de Melo LA, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A. Incidence and risk factors for non-adaptation of new mandibular complete dentures: a clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26 (06) 4633-4645
  • 19 Epifania E, Sanzullo R, Sorrentino R, Ausiello P. Evaluation of satisfaction perceived by prosthetic patients compared to clinical and technical variables. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2018; 8 (03) 252-258
  • 20 Widiger TA, Oltmanns JR. Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications. World Psychiatry 2017; 16 (02) 144-145
  • 21 Ribeiro JAM, de Resende CM, Lopes AL, Farias-Neto A, Carreiro AdaF. The influence of mandibular ridge anatomy on treatment outcome with conventional complete dentures. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2014; 27 (02) 53-57
  • 22 Celebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D, Papić M, Carek V, Baucić I, Stipetić J. Factors related to patient satisfaction with complete denture therapy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58 (10) M948-M953
  • 23 Sônego MV, Neto CLMM, Dos Santos DM, Moreno ALM, Bertoz APM, Goiato MC. Quality of life, satisfaction, occlusal force, and halitosis after direct and indirect relining of inferior complete dentures. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (01) 215-222