Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2024; 52(01): e25-e33
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787129
Artículo Original | Original Article

Reconstrucción no biológica del ligamento colateral cubital de la articulación metacarpofalángica del pulgar: Un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles

Article in several languages: español | English
Sergi Barrera-Ochoa 
1   Unidad de Mano, Codo y Microcirugía, Institut de la Mà, Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Cataluña, España
,
Julio Adrian Martínez-Garza 
1   Unidad de Mano, Codo y Microcirugía, Institut de la Mà, Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Cataluña, España
,
Rita Pereira-Cavaca
2   Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
,
Jose Prieto-Mere
1   Unidad de Mano, Codo y Microcirugía, Institut de la Mà, Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Cataluña, España
,
Gerardo Mendez-Sanchez
1   Unidad de Mano, Codo y Microcirugía, Institut de la Mà, Hospital General de Catalunya, San Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Cataluña, España
,
Francisco Soldado 
3   Unidad de Cirugía de Mano, Hospital HM Nens, Barcelona, Cataluña, España
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Resumen

Objetivo El objetivo de este análisis retrospectivo fue cotejar los resultados posoperatorios de la reconstrucción ligamentosa no biológica (RLNB) para lesiones crónicas que involucran la articulación metacarpofalángica (AMCF) y el ligamento colateral cubital (LCC) del primer dedo.

Materiales y Métodos En total, 18 pacientes con lesión de la AMCF fueron sometidos a una reconstrucción ligamentosa estática no biológica y se incluyeron en este análisis retrospectivo de casos y controles. Se compararon las mediciones preoperatorias, posoperatorias y del pulgar contralateral (evaluación clínica, radiografías y cuestionarios de resultados subjetivos) durante una media de 38 meses de seguimiento.

Resultados Para la RLNB, la media de rangos de movimiento posoperatorios de las AMCF y de las articulaciones interfalángicas del pulgar fueron de 0 a 57,5° y de 0 a 71°, respectivamente. Las fuerzas promedio de agarre y pinza, en relación con la mano no afectada, fueron de 103,3% y 88,7%, respectivamente. Todos los pacientes demostraron estabilidad con un punto final firme en relación con el pulgar no afectado. La puntuación media en la versión corta del cuestionario de Discapacidades de Brazo, Hombro y Mano (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, QuickDASH, en inglés) entre todos los pacientes fue de 11,9 para el módulo de discapacidad/síntoma, 0 para el módulo de deportes, y 16,5 para el módulo de trabajo. Se informó rigidez en cuatro pacientes, y ningún paciente sufrió problemas relacionados con la herida u otras complicaciones.

Conclusión La RLNB del LCC del pulgar genera buenos resultados a corto plazo, lo que puede permitir una recuperación y rehabilitación aceleradas.

Palabras clave

pulgar - ligamento - articulación metacarpofalángica - reconstrucción


Publication History

Received: 15 February 2023

Accepted: 01 April 2024

Article published online:
07 June 2024

© 2024. SECMA Foundation. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referencias

  • 1 Melone Jr CP, Beldner S, Basuk RS. Thumb collateral ligament injuries. An anatomic basis for treatment. Hand Clin 2000; 16 (03) 345-357
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Tang P. Collateral ligament injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (05) 287-296
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bronstein AJ, Koniuch MP, von Holsbeeck M. Ultrasonographic detection of thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (02) 304-312
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ebrahim FS, De Maeseneer M, Jager T, Marcelis S, Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA. US diagnosis of UCL tears of the thumb and Stener lesions: technique, pattern-based approach, and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2006; 26 (04) 1007-1020
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Glickel SZ, Malerich M, Pearce SM, Littler JW. Ligament replacement for chronic instability of the ulnar collateral ligament of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (05) 930-941
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Sakellarides HT, DeWeese JW. Instability of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb. Reconstruction of the collateral ligaments using the extensor pollicis brevis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58 (01) 106-112
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Glickel SZ. Thumb metacarpophalangeal joint ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a tendon graft. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2002; 6 (03) 133-139
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lee AT, Carlson MG. Thumb metacarpophalangeal joint collateral ligament injury management. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (03) 361-370 , ix–x
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Lee SK, Kubiak EN, Lawler E, Iesaka K, Liporace FA, Green SM. Thumb metacarpophalangeal ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a biomechanical simulation study of four static reconstructions. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30 (05) 1056-1060
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Samora JB, Harris JD, Griesser MJ, Ruff ME, Awan HM. Outcomes after injury to the thumb ulnar collateral ligament–a systematic review. Clin J Sport Med 2013; 23 (04) 247-254
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Dugas JR, Walters BL, Beason DP, Fleisig GS, Chronister JE. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Bracing Versus Modified Jobe Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (03) 735-741
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Edgar CM, Singh H, Obopilwe E. et al. Pectoralis Major Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis of Modern Repair Configurations Versus Traditional Repair Configuration. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (12) 2858-2863
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Christensen T, Sarfani S, Shin AY, Kakar S. Long-term outcomes of primary repair of chronic thumb ulnar collateral ligament injuries. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (03) 303-309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Carlson MG, Warner KK, Meyers KN, Hearns KA, Kok PL. Mechanics of an anatomical reconstruction for the thumb metacarpophalangeal collateral ligaments. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (01) 117-123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Catalano III LW, Cardon L, Patenaude N, Barron OA, Glickel SZ. Results of surgical treatment of acute and chronic grade III [corrected] tears of the radial collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (01) 68-75
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Werner BC, Hadeed MM, Lyons ML, Gluck JS, Diduch DR, Chhabra AB. Return to football and long-term clinical outcomes after thumb ulnar collateral ligament suture anchor repair in collegiate athletes. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (10) 1992-1998
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Cho BK, Kim YM, Park KJ, Park JK, Kim DK. A prospective outcome and cost-effectiveness comparison between two ligament reattachment techniques using suture anchors for chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36 (02) 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Cho BK, Park KJ, Park JK, SooHoo NF. Outcomes of the Modified Broström Procedure Augmented With Suture-Tape for Ankle Instability in Patients With Generalized Ligamentous Laxity. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38 (04) 405-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lee SJ, Rabinovich RV, Kim A. Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2020; 25 (01) 32-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 De Giacomo AF, Shin SS. Repair of the Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament With Suture Tape Augmentation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2017; 21 (04) 164-166
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Shin SS, van Eck CF, Uquillas C. Suture Tape Augmentation of the Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Study. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (09) 868.e1-868.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Schiphof D, Boers M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. Differences in descriptions of Kellgren and Lawrence grades of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67 (07) 1034-1036
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Patel NA, Lin CC, Itami Y, McGarry MH, Shin SS, Lee TQ. Kinematics of Thumb Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45 (02) 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Viens NA, Wijdicks CA, Campbell KJ, Laprade RF, Clanton TO. Anterior talofibular ligament ruptures, part 1: biomechanical comparison of augmented Broström repair techniques with the intact anterior talofibular ligament. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (02) 405-411
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Carlson GD, Botte MJ, Josephs MS, Newton PO, Davis JLW, Woo SLY. Morphologic and biomechanical comparison of tendons used as free grafts. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (01) 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Coyle Jr MP. Grade III radial collateral ligament injuries of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint: treatment by soft tissue advancement and bony reattachment. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (01) 14-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Lyons RP, Kozin SH, Failla JM. The anatomy of the radial side of the thumb: static restraints in preventing subluxation and rotation after injury. Am J Orthop 1998; 27 (11) 759-763
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Gangopadhyay S, McKenna H, Burke FD, Davis TRC. Five- to 18-year follow-up for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective comparison of excision, tendon interposition, and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (03) 411-417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Salem H, Davis TRC. Six year outcome excision of the trapezium for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: is it improved by ligament reconstruction and temporary Kirschner wire insertion?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (03) 211-219
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar