“Flap-in-Flap” Technique: Double V-Y Flap in Fingertip Injury Management

Abstract

Background Fingertip injuries with amputation are one of the common hand injury problems. Several reconstructive options are available for fingertip injury. V-Y advancement flap is one of the common flaps. In some cases, their advancement capacities are not sufficient to cover the whole defect, resulting in flexion deformity of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, loss of finger pulp shape, or hooked deformity. The double V-Y flap consists of harvesting two cutaneous flaps on the same neurovascular digital palmar bundle. The first V-Y flap is raised as a neurovascular flap and the second flap is an advancement V-Y plasty.

Objective This article evaluates the outcomes of the double V-Y advancement flap for the fingertip reconstruction.

Materials and Methods This is a prospective study on 19 patients with zone II and III fingertip amputation tip defects between December 2021 and June 2023. The majority were workplace injuries.

Results There were 16 males and 3 females. The average static two-point discrimination was 6 mm. Average advancement of first flap is 8.5 mm and the average advancement of second flap is 4.3 mm. The average total advancement of a double V-Y flap is 12.94 mm (10–15 mm). All of them had “good” total active motion with movement > 210. One patient had flexion deformity at the DIP joint without causing any functional disturbance. All the flaps settled well except for one patient who had superficial partial necrosis of flap which was managed conservatively.

Conclusion This is simple and safe for the reconstruction of zone II and III fingertip amputations with the advantage of like-for-like tissue with near-normal sensation. The second flap increased the advancement of the proximal flap, restoring the pulp shape, and thereby reconstructing a functional and aesthetic fingertip.

Keywords

double V-Y flap - flap-in-flap - fingertip injury - hand injury - fingertip reconstruction

Publication History

Article published online:
05 June 2024

• References

• 1 Giesen T, Adani R, Carmes S, Dumontier C, Elliot D, Calcagni M. IFSSH Scientific Committee on skin coverage: 2015 report. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35 (05) 307-319
• 2 Pomares G, Coudane H, Dap F, Dautel G. Epidemiology of traumatic upper limb amputations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (02) 273-276
• 3 Martin C, González del Pino J. Controversies in the treatment of fingertip amputations. Conservative versus surgical reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (353) 63-73
• 4 Quell M, Neubauer T, Wagner M. Treatment of fingertip defect injuries with a semi-occlusive dressing [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1998; 30 (01) 24-29
• 5 Guelmi K, Barbato B, Maladry D, Mitz V, Lemerle JP. Reconstruction of digital pulp by pulp tissue transfer of the toe. Apropos of 15 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1996; 82: 446-452
• 6 Tranquilli-Leali E. Ricostruzione dell'apice delle falangi ungueali mediante autoplastica volare peduncolata per scormento. Infort Traumatol Lav 1935; 1: 186-193
• 7 Atasoy E, Ioakimidis E, Kasdan ML, Kutz JE, Kleinert HE. Reconstruction of the amputated fingertip with a triangular volar flap. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970; 52 (05) 921-926
• 8 Lim JX, Chung KC. VY advancement, thenar flap, and cross-finger flaps. Hand Clin 2020; 36 (01) 19-32
• 9 Evans DM, Martin DL. Step-advancement island flap for fingertip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1988; 41 (02) 105-111
• 10 Arsalan-Werner A, Brui N, Mehling I, Schlageter M, Sauerbier M. Long-term outcome of fingertip reconstruction with the homodigital neurovascular island flap. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (08) 1171-1178
• 11 Kayalar M, Bal E, Toros T, Süğün ST, Özaksar K, Gürbüz Y. The outcome of direct-flow neurovascular island flaps in pulp defects. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45 (03) 175-184
• 12 Evans DM, Bernardis C. A new classification for fingertip injuries. J Hand Surg [Br] 2000; 25 (01) 58-60
• 13 Elliot D, Moiemen NS, Jigjinni VS. The neurovascular Tranquilli-Leali flap. J Hand Surg [Br] 1995; 20 (06) 815-823
• 14 Bakhach J, Guimberteau JC, Panconi B. The Gigogne flap: an original technique for an optimal pulp reconstruction. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (02) 227-234
• 15 Pun WK, Chow SP, So YC. et al. Unstable phalangeal fractures: treatment by A.O. screw and plate fixation. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16 (01) 113-117
• 16 Allen MJ. Conservative management of finger tip injuries in adults. Hand 1980; 12 (03) 257-265
• 17 Foucher G, Smith D, Pempinello C, Braun FM, Citron N. Homodigital neurovascular island flaps for digital pulp loss. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989; 14 (02) 204-208
• 18 Chakraborty SS, Kala PC, Sahu RK, Dixit PK, Katrolia D, Kotu S. Fingertip amputation reconstruction with VY advancement flap: literature review and comparative analysis of Atasoy and Kutler flaps. World J Plast Surg 2021; 10 (03) 8-17
• 19 Estoppey D, Pomares G, Jager T. Long-term outcome of a “short” anterograde homodigital neurovascular island flap with a simple or double V-Y plasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107 (05) 102981
• 20 Lok L-W, Chan W-L, Lau Y-K. Functional outcomes of antegrade homo-digital neurovascular island flaps for fingertip amputation. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2017; 22 (01) 39-45
• 21 Barbato BD, Guelmi K, Romano SJ, Mitz V, Lemerle JP. Thenar flap rehabilitated: a review of 20 cases. Ann Plast Surg 1996; 37 (02) 135-139
• 22 Tupper J, Miller G. Sensitivity following volar V-Y plasty for fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg [Br] 1985; 10 (02) 183-184
• 23 Díaz LC, Vergara-Amador E, Fuentes Losada LM. Double V-Y flap to cover the fingertip injury: new technique and cases. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2016; 20 (04) 133-136
• 24 Jager T, Mussi J-P, Pomares G. Optimization of the homodigital antegrade island flap for fingertip reconstruction: new dissection sequence based on cadaver study findings. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2020; 106 (02) 335-339