Case–Control and Cohort Studies in Homeopathy: Part 4 of the Research Method Series

Abstract

Case–control and cohort studies are fundamental epidemiological research designs utilized to investigate the relationship between exposures and outcomes in medical research. This paper provides a comparative analysis of these two study designs, focusing on their respective strengths, applications, and implications for understanding disease etiology, progression, and intervention effectiveness. Case–control studies offer a retrospective lens, enabling researchers to assess the impact of exposures on disease development by comparing individuals with a particular outcome (cases) to those without (controls). Through meticulous selection and analysis, case–control studies unveil potential risk factors and causal relationships, particularly beneficial for investigating rare diseases or long latency periods. Conversely, cohort studies adopt a prospective approach, following a group of individuals over time to evaluate the incidence of outcomes in relation to exposures. This design facilitates the assessment of cumulative exposure effects, disease progression, and intervention efficacy, providing valuable insights into the natural history of diseases. In the context of homeopathy, both the study designs may be utilized for the evaluation of long-term treatment effects, disease progression, and patient satisfaction, shedding light on the holistic nature of homeopathic care. By embracing rigorous methodologies and leveraging the strengths of both study designs, researchers in homeopathy can advance evidence-based practice, enhancing our understanding of homeopathic principles and their practical implications in clinical settings.

Keywords

case–control study - cohort study - homeopathy - exposure - risk factors

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. August 2024

• References

• 1 Dutta A. Navigating the budding researchers through different study designs in homeopathy: part 1 of research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36(2): 128-136
• 2 Liu H. Analyzing the relationship between cohort and case-control study results based on model for multiple pathogenic factors. Comput Math Methods Med 2019; 2019: 7507043
• 3 Lewallen S, Courtright P. Epidemiology in practice: case-control studies. Community Eye Health 1998; 11 (28) 57-58
• 4 Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J 2003; 20 (01) 54-60
• 5 Setia MS. Methodology series module 1: cohort studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61 (01) 21-25
• 6 Pottegård A. Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: fundamentals of the cohort and case-control study designs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2022; 31 (08) 817-826
• 7 Dutta A. Unleashing the power of narratives: crafting compelling homeopathic case reports—part 2 of the research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36 (03) 208-214
• 8 Dutta A. A guide to writing case series in homeopathy: a supplement to part 2 of the research method series. Homoeopath Links 2023; 36 (03) 215-218
• 9 Popovic A, Huecker MR. Study Bias. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL:: StatPearls Publishing;; 2024. . Accessed April 23, 2024 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574513/
• 10 Mahajan A. Selection bias: Selection of controls as a critical issue in the interpretation of results in a case control study. Indian J Med Res 2015; 142 (06) 768
• 11 Tenny S, Kerndt CC, Hoffman MR. Case Control Studies. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL:: StatPearls Publishing;; 2024. . Accessed April 23, 2024 at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448143/
• 12 Skelly AC, Dettori JR, Brodt ED. Assessing bias: the importance of considering confounding. Evid Based Spine Care J 2012; 3 (01) 9-12
• 13 Pourhoseingholi MA, Baghestani AR, Vahedi M. How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2012; 5 (02) 79-83
• 14 Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Making sense of odds and odds ratios. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111 (2 Pt 1): 423-426