RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787532
Nightmare Proneness Predicts Nightmare Frequency Incrementally Over Neuroticism and Distress
Funding Source None.
Abstract
Introduction Previous research found that nightmare proneness, a purported disposition to experience frequent nightmares, accounted for nightmare frequency independent of neuroticism and distress. However, these findings may have been the result of reduced reliability and content validity of the measures. The current study aimed to replicate these findings using established, lengthier measures of neuroticism and distress.
Materials and Methods In the present cross-sectional study, 230 university students completed measures of nightmare frequency, nightmare proneness, neuroticism, and distress.
Results Regression models found that nightmare proneness incrementally predicted nightmare frequency above neuroticism and distress. Additional analyses indicated that neuroticism and distress indirectly predicted nightmare frequency through nightmare proneness, whereas nightmare proneness was not associated with nightmares through neuroticism or distress.
Conclusion Nightmare proneness was statistically separable from neuroticism and distress. The results and suggestions for future research to better understand the nightmare proneness variable are discussed.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 22. September 2023
Angenommen: 15. April 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Juni 2024
© 2024. Brazilian Sleep Academy. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
References
- 1 Levin R, Nielsen TA. Disturbed dreaming, posttraumatic stress disorder, and affect distress: a review and neurocognitive model. Psychol Bull 2007; 133 (03) 482-528
- 2 Lemyre A, St-Onge M, Vallières A. The perceptions of nightmare sufferers regarding the functions, causes, and consequences of their nightmares, and their coping strategies: A qualitative study. Int J Dream Res 2019; 12 (02) 35-48
- 3 Gieselmann A, Ait Aoudia M, Carr M. et al. Aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder: State of the art and future perspectives. J Sleep Res 2019; 28 (04) e12820
- 4 Hartmann E. The nightmare. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1984
- 5 Carr M, Nielsen T. A novel Differential Susceptibility framework for the study of nightmares: Evidence for trait sensory processing sensitivity. Clin Psychol Rev 2017; 58: 86-96
- 6 Kelly WE. Nightmares and ego strength revisited: Ego strength predicts nightmares above neuroticism and general psychological distress. Dreaming 2020; 30 (01) 29-44
- 7 Kelly WE. The Nightmare Proneness Scale: A proposed measure for the tendency to experience nightmares. Sleep Hypn 2018; 20 (02) 120-127
- 8 Kelly WE, Yu Q. Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of the Nightmare Proneness Scale. Dreaming 2019; 29 (01) 100-111
- 9 Kelly WE, Daughtry D. Elucidating nightmare proneness: Relationships with emotional dysregulation and psychological vulnerability. Dreaming 2022; 32 (03) 281-291
- 10 Kelly WE, Mathe JR. Facets of the Nightmare Proneness Scale and their relationships to nightmares, negative affect, and psychological distress. Sleep Hypn 2021; 21 (04) 360-370
- 11 Kelly WE, Rhodes S. Nightmare proneness and psychological boundaries as predictors of nightmare frequency. Int J Dream Res 2021; 14 (Suppl. 01) s41
- 12 Kelly WE, Mathe JR, Yu Q. Specific versus scaled estimates: A comparison of two approaches to measuring retrospective nightmare frequency. Int J Dream Res 2018; 11 (02) 203-206
- 13 Kelly WE, Daughtry D. Gender differences in retrospective nightmare frequency among young adults: Effects of nightmare distress and affective distress. Int J Dream Res 2021; 14 (01) 131-135
- 14 Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R). Psychological Assessment Resources:; Odessa, FL;: 1992
- 15 Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R administration, scoring, and procedures manual II. Clinical Psychometric Research Baltimore; MD: 1983
- 16 Hayes AF. The PROCESS macro for SPSS, SAS, and R, version 4.0. 2021 . Available from https://www.processmacro.org/download.html
- 17 Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40 (03) 879-891
- 18 Kelly WE. Taking heart: Cardiac symptoms and nightmares differentiate nightmare proneness and psychological distress among young adults. Sleep Sci 2023; 16 (01) 59-67
- 19 Kohut H. The restoration of the self. New York, NY: International Universities Press; 1977
- 20 Solomonova E, Stenstrom P, Paquette T, Nielsen T. Different temporal patterns of memory incorporations into dreams for laboratory and virtual reality experiences: Relation to dreamed locus of control. Int J Dream Res 2015; 8 (01) 10-26