RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787658
Versatility and Outcomes of ‘Mumbai Technique’ of Stacked Cartilage Grafts in Indian Rhinoplasty
Autor*innen
Abstract
Background Augmentation rhinoplasty requires graft with substantial volume. In cases where patient is reluctant to use costal cartilage, this can be done using septum and conchal cartilage graft. Using the technique of “stacked cartilage graft” an assembly is made using septum and conchal cartilage for nasal augmentation and contour defects. Although multilayered grafts have been described before, we propose an elaborate and effective method named after our city, Mumbai, to shape these grafts and highlight economical use of conchal and septal cartilage to overcome its limited volume. It also describes its clinical and aesthetic outcome of this technique in Indian patients.
Materials and Methods A retrospective study from 2005 to 2020 was done in our institute. Data was collected from medical and hospital records. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were obtained for preoperative planning and outcome analysis. Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation score was used for outcome analysis. Minimum follow-up was 1 year in our study.
Results A total of 210 patients were included in our study. In all cases, the stacked cartilage graft technique produced a natural appearing dorsum. Complications of cartilage such as resorption, extrusion, and warping were minimum. All the patients were satisfied with their results.
Conclusion Although the limited volume of conchal cartilage is criticized, in reality it can be used effectively for larger requirement with “economy of use” using our technique. The curvatures and convolutions of conchal cartilage can be effectively neutralized by using this technique to obtain a smooth surface.
However, this technique requires incorporation of every bit of cartilage and meticulous stacking of the pieces to get the desired shape. Thus, the stacked cartilage grafts have excellent versatility and produce natural and long-lasting results and minimal complications.
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Juni 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Bhat U, Patel B. Primary rhinoplasty: an Indian perspective. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (suppl): S9-S19
- 2 Pandey S, Chittoria RK, Mohapatra DP, Friji MT, Sivakumar DK. Mnemonics for Gillies' principles of plastic surgery and its importance in residency training program. Indian J Plast Surg 2017; 50: 114-115
- 3 Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandão KV. et al. Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2012; 78 (04) 76-79
- 4 Bhat U, Gupta T, Nair M, Mantri M, Pawar M, Baliarsing A. Three component cartilage framework reconstruction for correction of post-traumatic nasal septal collapse. Indian J Plast Surg 2017; 50 (03) 236-243
- 5 Peer LA. Cartilage grafting. Br J Plast Surg 1954; 7: 250-262
- 6 Neligan PC. Plastic Surgery. London u.a. Elsevier Saunders; 2018
- 7 Sheen JH. The ideal dorsal graft: a continuing quest. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (07) 2490-2493
- 8 Safian J. Progress in nasal and chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966; 37 (05) 446-452
- 9 Daniel RK. Diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery: current techniques and applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (06) 1883-1891
- 10 Jang YJ, Yoo SH. Dorsal augmentation in facial profiloplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (05) 492-498
- 11 Lin SI, Hsiao YC, Chang CS, Chen PK, Chen JP, Ueng SH. Histology and long-term stability of diced cartilage graft for revision rhinoplasty in a cleft patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (06) e763
- 12 Zholtikov V, Golovatinskii V, Ouerghi R, Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: aesthetic augmentation with improvement of dorsal aesthetic lines. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (07) 759-769
- 13 Cerkes N, Basaran K. Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in rectus abdominis fascia for nasal dorsum augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 43-51
- 14 Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Yilmaz Z, Sahin FI, Tarhan E, Ozluoglu LN. Viability of cultured human nasal septum chondrocytes after crushing. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (06) 406-409
- 15 Rudderman RH, Guyuron B, Mendelsohn G. The fate of fresh and preserved, noncrushed and crushed autogenous cartilage in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (03) 250-254
- 16 Bujía J. Determination of the viability of crushed cartilage grafts: clinical implications for wound healing in nasal surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (03) 261-265
- 17 Hamra ST. Crushed cartilage grafts over alar dome reduction in open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (02) 352-356
- 18 Gruber RP, Wall SH, Kaufman D. Open rhinoplasty: concepts and techniques. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders (WB) Co Ltd.; 2005: 491-492
- 19 James DF. Controlling the stackeding of cartilage grafts for nose tips. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 10: 1016
- 20 Mao J, Carron M, Tomovic S, Narasimhan K, Allen S, Mathog RH. Cartilage grafts in dorsal nasal augmentation of traumatic saddle nose deformity: a long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2111-2117
- 21 Brenner MJ, Hilger PA. Grafting in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 91-113, vii