Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787721
Gigantic Macromastia: Modified Superomedial Pedicle is a Good Solution

Abstract
Background Reduction of very huge breast—gigantic macromastia—is a challenge to breast surgeons in choosing the right procedure to obtain an optimal outcome. The feasibility of a superomedial pedicle (SMP) with some modifications proves to be a good option to achieve a viable nipple areolar complex (NAC) with good size and shape after good resection above 800 g.
Materials and Methods Out of the 35 patients with 70 breast reductions, 15 can be considered gigantic macromastia with reductions above 800 g. A retrospective analysis of 30 breast reductions in these 15 patients from 2010 to 2023 was done. All cases were done using SMP with some modifications. The sternal notch to the nipple, the new NAC site, pedicle length, resection weight, and complications were analyzed. The modifications followed were lowering the new NAC, narrowing the distance between medial and lateral pillar width, medializing the pedicle, and lengthening the vertical limb.
Results There was no total necrosis of the NAC. Partial necrosis occurred in three patients that were managed conservatively and one case of fat necrosis needed debridement. All of them had a good size, shape, and form.
Conclusion SMP is a versatile technique with flexibility to modify the dimensions to get a robust blood supply to the NAC, after obtaining an adequate resection.
Keywords
gigantic macromastia - superomedial pedicle (SMP) - nipple areolar complex (NAC) - partial necrosisPublication History
Article published online:
20 June 2024
© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Hall-Findlay EJ, Shestak KC. Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136: 531-544
- 2 Wettstein R, Christofides E, Pittet B, Psaras G, Harder Y. Superior pedicle breast reduction for hypertrophy with massive ptosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (04) 500-507
- 3 Dancey A, Khan M, Dawson J, Peart F. Gigantomastia–a classification and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (05) 493-502
- 4 Landau AG, Hudson DA. Choosing the superomedial pedicle for reduction mammaplasty in gigantomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (03) 735-739
- 5 Fino P, Di Taranto G, Toscani M, Scuderi N. Surgical therapy of breast hypertrophy: a comparison of complications and satisfaction rate in large and small superior pedicle custom-made reduction mammaplasty. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20 (21) 4411-4415
- 6 Singolda R, Bracha G, Zoabi T. et al. Superiomedial pedicle breast reduction for gigantic breast hypertrophy: experience in 341 breasts and suggested safety modifications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (02) 375-385
- 7 Bar-Meir ED, Lin SJ, Momoh AO. et al. The lateral chest wall: a separate aesthetic unit in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (06) 626e-634e
- 8 Bauermeister AJ, Gill K, Zuriarrain A, Earle SA, Newman MI. “Reduction mammaplasty with superomedial pedicle technique: a literature review and retrospective analysis of 938 consecutive breast reductions”. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (03) 410-418
- 9 Sak MC, Akın S, Ersen B, Tunalı O, Ismail A. Management of gigantomastia: outcomes of superomedial pedicle with vertical scar or wise pattern skin excision. World J Plast Surg 2017; 6 (02) 206-211
- 10 Colen SR. Breast reduction with use of the free nipple graft technique. Aesthet Surg J 2001; 21 (03) 261-271
- 11 Lacerna M, Spears J, Mitra A. et al. Avoiding free nipple grafts during reduction mammaplasty in patients with gigantomastia. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (01) 21-24 , discussion 24
- 12 Gerzenshtein J, Oswald T, McCluskey P, Caplan J, Angel MF. Avoiding free nipple grafting with the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (03) 245-249
- 13 Ashour T, Khachaba Y, El Naggar A. Supero-medial reduction mammaplasty: a safe and reliable technique in gigantomastia and severe breast ptosis. Electron Physician 2018; 10 (08) 7230-7234
- 14 Hammond DC, Loffredo M. Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (05) 829e-839e
- 15 Hall-Findlay EJ. Pedicles in vertical breast reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plast Surg 2002; 29 (03) 379-391
- 16 Nahabedian MY, McGibbon BM, Manson PN. Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 896-904
- 17 Kerrigan CL, Comizio RC, Ho O. Superomedial pedicle breast reduction using a vertical pattern. In: Hall-Findlay EJ, Evans GRD. eds. Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast. 1st ed.. London: Saunders Ltd; 2010: 284-285
- 18 van Deventer PV, Graewe FR. The blood supply of the breast revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1388-1397
- 19 Cunningham BL, Gear AJ, Kerrigan CL, Collins ED. Analysis of breast reduction complications derived from the BRAVO study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (06) 1597-1604
- 20 Lista F, Ahmad J. Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: a 15-year experience including a review of 250 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2152-2165 , discussion 2166–2169
- 21 Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (02) 455-462