Understanding the Misconceptions about Traumatic Brain Injury among Indian Young Adults

Abstract

Background Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) pose significant challenges globally. The implementation of TBI prevention programs is highly reliant on the prevalent misconceptions. There is a paucity of research exploring the misconceptions regarding TBIs among young adults in India. Therefore, the present study explores the prevalence and nature of misconceptions regarding TBIs among young adults.

Materials and Methods This prospective survey study, with 150 participants aged 18 to 25 years, utilized the Common Misconceptions about Traumatic Brain Injury questionnaire comprising 40 items across 7 domains. The data was analyzed using Jamovi (2.3.28 solid).

Results The results revealed that the participants have high rates of misconception regarding brain injury sequelae, brain damage, and seatbelt prevention and low rates regarding the posttraumatic amnesia. Overall, females exhibited a higher rate of misconceptions compared with males. Higher years of education were associated with lesser misconceptions. Prior exposure to TBI had no significant impact on overall awareness of TBI.

Conclusion This study highlights important misconceptions about TBIs among young adults. Education and gender might play a vital role in these misconceptions. These findings might inform the development of preventive modules for TBIs and to enhance their effectiveness.

Keywords

traumatic brain injury - misconceptions - prior exposure - brain damage - prevalence

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
24. Juni 2024

• References

• 1 Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI. Demographics and Clinical Assessment Working Group of the International and Interagency Initiative toward Common Data Elements for Research on Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychological Health. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (11) 1637-1640
• 2 Galgano M, Toshkezi G, Qiu X, Russell T, Chin L, Zhao L-R. Traumatic brain injury: current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Cell Transplant 2017; 26 (07) 1118-1130
• 3 Azouvi P, Arnould A, Dromer E, Vallat-Azouvi C. Neuropsychology of traumatic brain injury: an expert overview. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2017; 173 (7-8): 461-472
• 4 Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation 2007; 22 (05) 341-353
• 5 Lopez AD, Murray CC. The global burden of disease, 1990-2020. Nat Med 1998; 4 (11) 1241-1243
• 6 Gururaj G. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario. Neurol Res 2002; 24 (01) 24-28
• 7 Agrawal A, Munivenkatappa A, Shukla DP. et al. Traumatic brain injury related research in India: an overview of published literature. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016; 6 (02) 65-69
• 8 McKinlay A, Grace RC, Horwood LJ, Fergusson DM, Ridder EM, MacFarlane MR. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury among children, adolescents and young adults: prospective evidence from a birth cohort. Brain Inj 2008; 22 (02) 175-181
• 9 Maheshwari J, Mohan D. Road traffic injuries in Delhi: a hospital-based study. J Traffic Med 1989; 17 (04) 23-27
• 10 Sidhu DS, Sodi GS, Banerjee AK. Mortality profile in trauma victims. Indian J Med Sci 1993; 47 (01) 12-18 Erratum in: Indian J Med Sci 1993 Mar;47(3):80. PMID: 8514341
• 11 Gouvier WD, Prestholdt PH, Warner MS. A survey of common misconceptions about head injury and recovery. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1988; 3 (04) 331-343
• 12 Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73 (02) 103-111
• 13 Guilmette TJ, Paglia MF. The public's misconception about traumatic brain injury: a follow up survey. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004; 19 (02) 183-189
• 14 Hux K, Bush E, Evans K, Simanek G. Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among students preparing to be special education professionals. Support Learn 2013; 28 (03) 109-114
• 15 Chapman RC, Hudson JM. Beliefs about brain injury in Britain. Brain Inj 2010; 24 (06) 797-801
• 16 Gurusamy J, Gandhi S, Amudhan S. et al. Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among nursing students in India: implications for nursing care and curriculum. BMC Nurs 2019; 18: 64
• 17 GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (01) 56-87 Erratum in: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7. PMID: 30497965; PMCID: PMC6291456
• 18 Springer JA, Parmer JE, Bouman DE. Common misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among family members of rehabilitation patients. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997; 12 (03) 41-50
• 19 Pappadis MR, Sander AM, Struchen MA, Leung P, Smith DW. Common misconceptions about traumatic brain injury among ethnic minorities with TBI. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2011; 26 (04) 301-311
• 20 Ernst WJ, Trice AD, Gilbert JL, Potts H. Misconceptions about traumatic brain injury and recovery among nursing students. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2009; 24 (03) 213-220
• 21 Pretorius C, Broodryk M. Misconceptions about traumatic brain injuries among South African university students. S Afr J Psychiatry 2013; 19 (03) 5
• 22 Steward KA, Gerstenecker A, Triebel KL. et al. Twelve-month recovery of medical decision-making capacity following traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2016; 87 (10) 1052-1059
• 23 Devi BI, Shukla DP, Bhat DI. et al. Neurotrauma care delivery in a limited resource setting-lessons learned from referral and patient flow in a tertiary care center. World Neurosurg 2019; 123: e588-e596
• 24 Kamal VK, Agrawal D, Pandey RM. Prognostic models for prediction of outcomes after traumatic brain injury based on patients admission characteristics. Brain Inj 2016; 30 (04) 393-406