Download PDF
Semin intervent Radiol 2024; 41(03): 258-262
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788058
Review Article

Imaging Guidelines during Percutaneous Liver Ablation to Optimize Outcomes and Patient Safety

J. Tyler Hammett
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Milan N. Patel
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Bruno C. Odisio
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Ketan Shah
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Image-guided ablation procedures have become a mainstay in cancer therapy. Typically performed from a percutaneous approach, thermal-based ablation procedures rely heavily on imaging guidance both prior to and during the procedure itself. Advances in imaging as they relate to ablation procedures are as important to successful treatments as advancements in the ablation technology itself. Imaging as it relates to procedural planning, targeting and monitoring, and assessment of procedural endpoint is the focus of this article.

Keywords

interventional radiology - ablation radiofrequency ablation - imaging - navigation


Publication History

Article published online:
19 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Tinguely P, Ruiter SJS, Engstrand J. et al. A prospective multicentre trial on survival after Microwave Ablation VErsus Resection for Resectable Colorectal liver metastases (MAVERRIC). Eur J Cancer 2023; 187: 65-76
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Glassberg MB, Ghosh S, Clymer JW, Wright GWJ, Ferko N, Amaral JF. Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17 (01) 98
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pua BB, Sofocleous CT. Imaging to optimize liver tumor ablation. Imaging Med 2010; 2 (04) 433-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Choi D, Lim HK, Kim SH. et al. Assessment of therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous radio frequency ablation: comparison of multiphase helical computed tomography and power Doppler ultrasonography with a microbubble contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21 (04) 391-401
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lee DH, Lee JM. Recent advances in the image-guided tumor ablation of liver malignancies: radiofrequency ablation with multiple electrodes, real-time multimodality fusion imaging, and new energy sources. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19 (04) 545-559
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Taiji R, Lin EY, Lin YM. et al. Combined angio-CT systems: a roadmap tool for precision therapy in interventional oncology. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2021; 3 (05) e210039
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ortiz D, Jahangir A, Singh M, Allaqaband S, Bajwa TK, Mewissen MW. Access site complications after peripheral vascular interventions: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7 (06) 821-828
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ryan ER, Sofocleous CT, Schöder H. et al. Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness. Radiology 2013; 268 (01) 288-295
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Prosch H, Stadler A, Schilling M. et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81 (05) 1029-1033
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 2000; 216 (01) 180-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Buls N, Pagés J, de Mey J, Osteaux M. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys 2003; 85 (02) 165-173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Irie T, Kajitani M, Itai Y. CT fluoroscopy-guided intervention: marked reduction of scattered radiation dose to the physician's hand by use of a lead plate and an improved I-I device. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (12) 1417-1421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Stoeckelhuber BM, Leibecke T, Schulz E. et al. Radiation dose to the radiologist's hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005; 28 (05) 589-594
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Inaba Y, Hitachi S, Watanuki M, Chida K. Radiation eye dose for physicians in CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy. Tomography 2022; 8 (01) 438-446
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Cahalane AM, Habibollahi S, Staffa SJ, Yang K, Fintelmann FJ, Chang CY. Helical CT versus intermittent CT fluoroscopic guidance for musculoskeletal needle biopsies: impact on radiation exposure, procedure time, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52 (06) 1119-1126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Goiffon RJ, Best TD, Wrobel MM. et al. Reducing time and patient radiation of computed tomography-guided thoracic needle biopsies with single-rotation axial acquisitions: an alternative to “CT fluoroscopy”. J Thorac Imaging 2021; 36 (06) 389-396
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kajiwara K, Murakami K, Maeda H. et al. Computed tomography fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of lung nodules: comparison of the step-wise and real-time techniques. Hiroshima J Med Sci 2021; 70: 35-38
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Puijk RS, Ruarus AH, Scheffer HJ. et al. Percutaneous liver tumour ablation: image guidance, endpoint assessment, and quality control. Can Assoc Radiol J 2018; 69 (01) 51-62
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 van Tilborg AAJM, Scheffer HJ, Nielsen K. et al. Transcatheter CT arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography for liver tumor visualization during percutaneous ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014; 25 (07) 1101-1111.e4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bréhier G, Besnier L, Delagnes A. et al. Imaging after percutaneous thermal and non-thermal ablation of hepatic tumour: normal appearances, progression and complications. Br J Radiol 2021; 94 (1123) 20201327
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL. et al; International Working Group on Image-guided Tumor Ablation, Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières Expert Panel, Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology, Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria–a 10-year update. Radiology 2014; 273 (01) 241-260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kim YS, Lee WJ, Rhim H, Lim HK, Choi D, Lee JY. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195 (03) 758-765
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sofocleous CT, Sideras P, Petre EN. “How we do it” - a practical approach to hepatic metastases ablation techniques. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 16 (04) 219-229
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar