Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · ACI open 2024; 08(02): e49-e61
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788563
Review Article

Dealing with Diversity in Digital Psychological Interventions for Young People: A Structured Review

Farzad Jahedi
1   School of Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Paul W. Fay Henman
1   School of Social Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
,
Jillian C. Ryan
2   Human Health, Health & Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia
› Author Affiliations Funding This paper reports doctoral research undertaken by the principal author, which was funded under the CSIRO-UQ Collaboration on Responsible Innovation (2017–2024), Australia.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In recent years, despite significant progress in digital psychological interventions (DPIs), the prevalence of psychological issues among young adults remains a concern. While research on the feasibility and effectiveness of DPIs is extensive, there's a growing recognition of the need for a sociotechnical approach to enhance user engagement. This review aims to highlight the importance of integrating diversity, especially sociodemographic characteristics, into DPI design and implementation.

The review meticulously examined literature from six academic databases focused on DPIs tailored for users aged 12 to 26, spanning the period between 2009 and 2019. The data extraction process specifically targeted biosocial factors such as gender and ethnicity, as well as sociocultural elements like remoteness and labor force status among users. Among the initial pool of 879 articles, a refined selection of 25 underwent detailed analysis. Intriguingly, 14 of these studies did not treat sociodemographic factors as independent variables, leaving only 11 that did. Notably, gender and ethnicity emerged as the most frequently studied factors, with remoteness and labor force considerations receiving comparatively less attention.

Despite the acknowledged importance of user engagement in DPI effectiveness, the review highlights a critical gap: insufficient consideration of young adults' sociodemographic characteristics in intervention design and implementation. Therefore, the findings strongly support further mixed-method studies to fully understand the complex social factors influencing user engagement with DPIs. Closing this gap will undoubtedly refine and optimize DPIs to better meet the diverse needs of young adults dealing with psychological challenges.

Keywords

digital health - digital mental health - digital psychological intervention - demographics - social diversity

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

No human subjects were involved in this study.




Publication History

Received: 29 January 2024

Accepted: 07 June 2024

Article published online:
15 July 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Mitchell M, Kan L. Digital technology and the future of health systems. Health Syst Reform 2019; 5 (02) 113-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S. et al. The WPA-Lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4 (10) 775-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Graham AK, Lattie EG, Mohr DC. Experimental therapeutics for digital mental health. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76 (12) 1223-1224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 World Health Organisation. Adolescent health - Mortality and DALYs in adolescents by WHO region, 2000 and 2012, aged 10–19 years. World Health Organization; 2012. . Accessed December 5, 2019 at: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.wrapper.MortAdov?lang=en
    Google Scholar
  • 5 World Health Organisation. Adolescent mental health. World Health Organization; ; October 23, 2019. Accessed December 29, 2019 at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-mental-health
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Dick B, Ferguson BJ. Health for the world's adolescents: a second chance in the second decade. J Adolesc Health 2015; 56 (01) 3-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Findling RL, Stepanova E. The workforce shortage of child and adolescent psychiatrists: is it time for a different approach?. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2018; 57 (05) 300-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Naslund JA, Aschbrenner KA, Araya R. et al. Digital technology for treating and preventing mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries: a narrative review of the literature. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4 (06) 486-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Odgers CL, Jensen MR. Annual research review: adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020; 61 (03) 336-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf Syst Res 1991; 2 (03) 173-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ziefle M, Schaar AK. Technology acceptance by patients: empowerment and stigma. In: van Hoof J, Demiris G, Wouters EJM. eds. Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being. Springer International Publishing; 2017: 167-177
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Pearson R, Carl E, Creech SK. Computerized psychological interventions in veterans and service members: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (06) e30065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Swift JK, Callahan JL, Cooper M, Parkin SR. The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 2018; 74 (11) 1924-1937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hornstein S, Zantvoort K, Lueken U, Funk B, Hilbert K. Personalization strategies in digital mental health interventions: a systematic review and conceptual framework for depressive symptoms. Front Digit Health 2023; 5: 1170002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Short CE, DeSmet A, Woods C. et al. Measuring engagement in eHealth and mHealth behavior change interventions: viewpoint of methodologies. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (11) e292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ho TQA, Le LKD, Engel L. et al. Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with web-based mental health interventions in young people: a systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2024; DOI: 10.1007/s00787-024-02386-x.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C. et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet 2018; 392 (10157): 1553-1598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hollis C, Falconer CJ, Martin JL. et al. annual research review: digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems - a systematic and meta-review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2017; 58 (04) 474-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hollis C, Morriss R, Martin J. et al. Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital revolution. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206 (04) 263-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Polity Press; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Germov J. Second Opinion: An Introduction to Health Sociology. Oxford University Press; 2018. . Accessed July 22, 2021 at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uql/detail.action?docID=5611991
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Aneshensel CS, Phelan JC. eds. Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health. 1. Softcover print. Springer; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. From 'problem-describing' to 'problem-solving': challenging the 'deficit' view of remote and rural health. Aust J Rural Health 2010; 18 (05) 205-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Thomas RK. Concepts, Methods and Practical Applications in Applied Demography. Springer International Publishing; 2018
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 DeLamater J, Ward A. eds. Handbook of Social Psychology. Springer Netherlands; 2013
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gunaratnam Y. Researching Race and Ethnicity. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2003
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Goe WR, Noonan S. The sociology of community. In: 21st Century Sociology: A Reference Handbook. 2007: 454-464
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Meer N. Ethnicity. In: Key Concepts in Race and Ethnicity, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014: 38-42
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Wakerman J. Defining remote health. Aust J Rural Health 2004; 12 (05) 210-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bergin AD, Vallejos EP, Davies EB. et al. Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3 (01) 133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Garrido S, Millington C, Cheers D. et al. What works and what doesn't work? a systematic review of digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in young people. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Henson P, Wisniewski H, Hollis C, Keshavan M, Torous J. Digital mental health apps and the therapeutic alliance: initial review. BJPsych Open 2019; 5 (01) e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rudd BN, Beidas RS. Digital mental health: the answer to the global mental health crisis?. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7 (06) e18472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tremain H, McEnery C, Fletcher K, Murray G. The therapeutic alliance in digital mental health interventions for serious mental illnesses: narrative review. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7 (08) e17204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Bevan Jones R, Stallard P, Agha SS. et al. Practitioner review: co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2020; 61 (08) 928-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Liverpool S, Mota CP, Sales CMD. et al. Engaging children and young people in digital mental health interventions: systematic review of modes of delivery, facilitators, and barriers. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (06) e16317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lo B, Shi J, Hollenberg E, Abi-Jaoudé A, Johnson A, Wiljer D. Surveying the role of analytics in evaluating digital mental health interventions for transition-aged youth: scoping review. JMIR Ment Health 2020; 7 (06) e15942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wykes T, Lipshitz J, Schueller SM. Towards the design of ethical standards related to digital mental health and all its applications. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 2019; 6 (03) 232-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Raphiphatthana B, Maulana H, Howarth T, Gardner K, Nagel T. Digital mental health resources for asylum seekers, refugees, and immigrants: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9 (08) e19031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schueller SM, Hunter JF, Figueroa C, Aguilera A. Use of digital mental health for marginalized and underserved populations. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 2019; 6 (03) 243-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Carter H, Araya R, Anjur K, Deng D, Naslund JA. The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: a review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 133: 223-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Jankovic D, Bojke L, Marshall D. et al. Systematic review and critique of methods for economic evaluation of digital mental health interventions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021; 19 (01) 17-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009; 26 (02) 91-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 (71) n71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force, American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Australian Psychological Society. Evidence-Based Psychological Interventions in the Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Literature Review; 2018. Accessed August 30, 2019 at: https://www.psychology.org.au/About-Us/What-we-do/advocacy/Position-Papers-Discussion-Papers-and-Reviews/psychological-interventions-mental-disorders
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Ray AK. Zotero: Open Source Citation Management Tool for Researchers. 2017: 8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Price M, Yuen EK, Davidson TM, Hubel G, Ruggiero KJ. Access and completion of a web-based treatment in a population-based sample of tornado-affected adolescents. Psychol Serv 2015; 12 (03) 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Lungu A, Sun M. Time for a change: college students' preference for technology-mediated versus face-to-face help for emotional distress. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22 (12) 991-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Neal-Barnett A, Stadulis R, Ellzey D. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a musical cognitive restructuring app for Black inner-city girls: survey, usage, and focus group evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7 (06) e11310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ling TC, Alam T, Hussin AAA. Investigation of the role of individual's gender in the design of graphical user interface for mobile learning device. J Phys Conf Ser 2020; 1529 (03) 032021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kayrouz R, Karin E, Staples LG, Nielssen O, Dear BF, Titov N. A comparison of the characteristics and treatment outcomes of migrant and Australian-born users of a national digital mental health service. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20 (01) 111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Shepherd M, Merry S, Lambie I, Thompson A. Indigenous adolescents' perception of an eMental health program (SPARX): exploratory qualitative assessment. JMIR Serious Games 2018; 6 (03) e13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Schueller SM, Glover AC, Rufa AK. et al. A mobile phone-based intervention to improve mental health among homeless young adults: pilot feasibility trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7 (07) e12347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Agyapong VIO, Juhás M, Ohinmaa A. et al. Randomized controlled pilot trial of supportive text messages for patients with depression. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17 (01) 286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Orkin AM, Nicoll G, Persaud N, Pinto AD. Reporting of sociodemographic variables in randomized clinical trials, 2014-2020. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4 (06) e2110700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pratt A, Nunes J, Nunes J. Interactive Design: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of User-Centered Design. Quarto Publishing Group USA; 2012. . Accessed June 23, 2022 at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uql/detail.action?docID=3399638
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Oladapo H, Owusu E, Chakraborty J. Effects of culturally tailored user interface design. In: Ahram TZ, Falcão CS. eds. Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Springer International Publishing; 2021: 845-853
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Kondratova I, Goldfarb I. Cultural interface design: global colors study. In: Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero P. eds. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer; 2006: 926-934
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Rauterberg M. ed. Culture and Computing. Design Thinking and Cultural Computing: 9th International Conference, C&C 2021, Held as Part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part II. Vol. 12795. Springer International Publishing; 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Clarke MA, Lyden ER, Ma J. et al. Sociodemographic differences and factors affecting patient portal utilization. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2021; 8 (04) 879-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Albers B, Shlonsky A, Mildon R. eds. Implementation Science 3.0. Springer International Publishing; 2020
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Wienert J, Zeeb H. Implementing health apps for digital public health - an implementation science approach adopting the consolidated framework for implementation research. Front Public Health 2021; 9: 610237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Park S. Digital inequalities in rural Australia: a double jeopardy of remoteness and social exclusion. J Rural Stud 2017; 54: 399-407
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Aryana B, Brewster L, Nocera JA. Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory review. Health Technol 2019; 9 (04) 401-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Cross SP, Karin E, Staples LG. et al. Factors associated with treatment uptake, completion, and subsequent symptom improvement in a national digital mental health service. Internet Interv 2022; 27: 100506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Kirvin-Quamme A, Kissinger J, Quinlan L. et al. Common practices for sociodemographic data reporting in digital mental health intervention research: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2024; 14 (02) e078029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Law EF, Fisher E, Howard WJ, Levy R, Ritterband L, Palermo TM. Longitudinal change in parent and child functioning after internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Pain 2017; 158 (10) 1992-2000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Ruggiero KJ, Price M, Adams Z. et al. Web intervention for adolescents affected by disaster: population-based randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015; 54 (09) 709-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Agyapong VIO, Mrklas K, Juhás M. et al. Cross-sectional survey evaluating Text4Mood: mobile health program to reduce psychological treatment gap in mental healthcare in Alberta through daily supportive text messages. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16 (01) 378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Spates CR, Kalata AH, Ozeki S, Stanton CE, Peters S. Initial open trial of a computerized behavioral activation treatment for depression. Behav Modif 2013; 37 (03) 259-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Gómez I, Flujas-Contreras JM, Ruiz-Castañeda D, Castilla D. A virtual reality–based psychological treatment in long-term hospitalization: a case study. Clin Case Stud 2019; 18 (01) 3-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Lillevoll KR, Vangberg HCB, Griffiths KM, Waterloo K, Eisemann MR. Uptake and adherence of a self-directed internet-based mental health intervention with tailored e-mail reminders in senior high schools in Norway. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14 (01) 14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Garrido G, Barrios M, Penadés R. et al. Computer-assisted cognitive remediation therapy: cognition, self-esteem and quality of life in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2013; 150 (2–3): 563-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Schroevers M. Effects of a cognitive behavioral self-help program on depressed mood for people with acquired chronic physical impairments: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 85 (02) 304-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Høifødt RS, Lillevoll KR, Griffiths KM. et al. The clinical effectiveness of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy with face-to-face therapist support for depressed primary care patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15 (08) e153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Brabyn S, Araya R, Barkham M. et al. The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT-2) trial: does the provision of telephone support enhance the effectiveness of computer-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy? A randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20 (89) 1-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Reid SC, Kauer SD, Hearps SJC. et al. A mobile phone application for the assessment and management of youth mental health problems in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Staples LG, Dear BF, Johnson B. et al. Internet-delivered treatment for young adults with anxiety and depression: evaluation in routine clinical care and comparison with research trial outcomes. J Affect Disord 2019; 256: 103-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Thew GR, Powell CL, Kwok AP. et al. Internet-based cognitive therapy for social anxiety disorder in Hong Kong: therapist training and dissemination case series. JMIR Form Res 2019; 3 (02) e13446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Li WHC, Chung JOK, Ho EKY. The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well-being of children hospitalised with cancer. J Clin Nurs 2011; 20 (15–16): 2135-2143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Bunnell BE, Davidson TM, Dewey D, Price M, Ruggiero KJ. Rural and urban/suburban families' use of a web-based mental health intervention. Telemed J E Health 2017; 23 (05) 390-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Baumeister H, Seifferth H, Lin J, Nowoczin L, Lüking M, Ebert D. Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on patients' acceptance of internet-based pain interventions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain 2015; 31 (06) 528-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Bansa M, Brown D, DeFrino D. et al. A little effort can withstand the hardship: fielding an internet-based intervention to prevent depression among urban racial/ethnic minority adolescents in a primary care setting. J Natl Med Assoc 2018; 110 (02) 130-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Stjerneklar S, Hougaard E, Nielsen AD, Gaardsvig MM, Thastum M. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with anxiety disorders: a feasibility study. Internet Interv 2018; 11: 30-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Lucassen MF, Hatcher S, Fleming TM, Stasiak K, Shepherd MJ, Merry SN. A qualitative study of sexual minority young people's experiences of computerised therapy for depression. Australas Psychiatry 2015; 23 (03) 268-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar