CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2025; 35(01): 017-024
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788574
Original Article

Imaging Classification of Exophytic HCC and Our Experience with Microwave Ablation of Type 2 Lesions

1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Pallav Bhatter
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Girendra Shankar
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Anubhav Khandelwal
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Sanjay Saran Baijal
1   Department of Interventional Radiology, Medanta–The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to classify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on imaging and to evaluate the role of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) in the management of type 2 exophytic HCC.

Materials and Methods A retrospective study was performed at our institution after approval by the Institutional Review Board. The study was undertaken from January 2017 to May 2022. Based on the location, HCC was classified and categorized on cross-sectional imaging into four types. All MWA procedures were performed using ultrasound guidance. Patients were followed up every 3 months with cross-sectional imaging.

Results During the study period, 225 lesions were reviewed. MWA was performed in 13 type 2 exophytic HCC patients. Segment 3 (38%) was the most common site when categorized as per Couinaud classification and segment 6 was the next common site. Technical success of complete ablation, evaluated by postprocedure contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan, was 100%. The median follow-up period was 24 months (range: 9–24 months). One patient presented with a residual lesion on the first follow-up at 30 days. Two other patients followed up to 9 months were free of HCC. Ten patients followed up at 1 year showed no recurrence, while 7 of them were followed up for 24 months, and 1 of whom showed multicentric recurrence which was treated by selective intra-arterial radiation therapy.

Conclusion A classification system for exophytic lesions can allow for better patient selection, planning, and reporting of ablative outcomes. MWA has performed well when ablating these technically challenging lesions with a certain degree of planning.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 July 2024

© 2024. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Albarrak J, Al-Shamsi H. Current status of management of hepatocellular carcinoma in the Gulf region: challenges and recommendations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15 (07) 2001
  • 2 Lee J, Jin YJ, Shin SK. et al. Surgery versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with Child- Pugh class-A/single small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28 (02) 207-218
  • 3 Glassberg MB, Ghosh S, Clymer JW, Wright GWJ, Ferko N, Amaral JF. Microwave ablation compared with hepatic resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17 (01) 98
  • 4 Mogahed MM, Zytoon AA, Eysa B, Manaa M, Abdellatif W. Outcome of laparoscopic assisted percutaneous microwave ablation for exophytic versus non-exophytic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 52 (03) 892-898
  • 5 Ding J, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Jing X, Wang F, Wang Y. Percutaneous microwave ablation of exophytic tumours in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: safe or not?. Liver Int 2017; 37 (09) 1365-1372
  • 6 Kotoh K, Nakamuta M, Morizono S. et al. A multi-step, incremental expansion method for radio frequency ablation: optimization of the procedure to prevent increases in intra-tumor pressure and to reduce the ablation time. Liver Int 2005; 25 (03) 542-547
  • 7 European Association For The Study Of The Liver, European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 56 (04) 908-943
  • 8 Dietrich CF, Lorentzen T, Appelbaum L. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III - Abdominal Treatment Procedures (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37 (01) 27-45
  • 9 Llovet JM, Vilana R, Brú C. et al; Barcelona Clínic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2001; 33 (05) 1124-1129
  • 10 Jaskolka JD, Asch MR, Kachura JR. et al. Needle tract seeding after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16 (04) 485-491
  • 11 Patidar Y, Singhal P, Gupta S, Mukund A, Sarin SK. Radiofrequency ablation of surface v/s intraparenchymal hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2017; 27 (04) 496-502
  • 12 Kang TW, Lim HK, Lee MW. et al. Long-term therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular versus nonsubcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched study. Radiology 2016; 280 (01) 300-312
  • 13 Bader TR, Braga L, Semelka RC. Exophytic benign tumors of the liver: appearance on MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19 (05) 623-628
  • 14 Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S. et al. Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol 2003; 38 (10) 977-981
  • 15 Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Goldberg SN. Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology 2003; 226 (02) 441-451
  • 16 Kim YJ, Raman SS, Yu NC, Busuttil RW, Tong M, Lu DS. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: can subcapsular tumors be safely ablated?. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190 (04) 1029-1034
  • 17 Francica G, Meloni MF, de Sio I. et al. Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma accessed by direct puncture: safety and efficacy. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85 (04) 739-743
  • 18 Sartori S, Tombesi P, Macario F. et al. Subcapsular liver tumors treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: a prospective comparison with nonsubcapsular liver tumors for safety and effectiveness. Radiology 2008; 248 (02) 670-679
  • 19 Filippousis P, Sotiropoulou E, Manataki A, Konstantinopoulos O, Thanos L. Radiofrequency ablation of subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma: single center experience. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77 (02) 299-304
  • 20 Patel PA, Ingram L, Wilson ID, Breen DJ. No-touch wedge ablation technique of microwave ablation for the treatment of subcapsular tumors in the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24 (08) 1257-1262
  • 21 Hui TC, Kwan J, Pua U. Advanced techniques in the percutaneous ablation of liver tumours. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11 (04) 585