Optimal Magnetic Resonance Sequence for Assessment of Central Cartilage Tumor Scalloping

Abstract

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is key in evaluating central cartilage tumors. The BACTIP (Birmingham Atypical Cartilaginous Tumour Imaging Protocol) protocol assesses central cartilage tumor risk based on the tumor size and degree of endosteal scalloping on MRI. It provides a management protocol for assessment, follow-up, or referral of central cartilage tumors.

Objectives Our study compared four MRI sequences: T1-weighted (T1-w), fluid sensitive (Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR)- weighted, STIR-w), and grayscale inversions (T1-w GSI and short tau inversion recovery [STIR] GSI) to see how reliably endosteal scalloping was detected.

Materials and Methods Two senior consultant musculoskeletal radiologists with experience reviewed randomly selected 60 representative central cartilage tumor cases with varying degree of endosteal scalloping to reflect a spectrum of BACTIP pathologies. The endosteal scalloping was graded as per the definition of BACTIP A, B, and C. They agreed on a consensus BACTIP grade for each of the 240 key images (60 cases × 4 sequences), which was considered the final “consensus” BACTIP grade. These 240 images were then randomized into a test set and given to two fellowship-trained consultant musculoskeletal radiologists for analysis. They assigned a BACTIP grade to each of the 240 selected images while being blinded to the final “consensus” BACTIP grade. The training set was further subdivided into three groups based on the MR image quality (good quality, average quality, and poor quality) to ascertain if the quality of the acquired images influenced intraobserver and interobserver agreements on the BACTIP grading. The two observers were blinded to the grade assigned to the image quality.

Results Linearly weighted kappa analysis was performed to measure the agreement between the BACTIP grading answers by two observers and the “consensus” BACTIP grading answers, as well as the BACTIP grading agreement between the two observers themselves. The analysis revealed that T1-w and STIR-w sequences demonstrated more consistent and higher agreement across different image qualities. However, the T1-w GSI and STIR-w GSI sequences exhibited lower agreement, particularly for poor-quality images. T1-w imaging demonstrated substantial agreement between BACTIP gradings for poor-quality images, suggesting potential resilience of T1-w sequence in challenging imaging conditions.

Conclusion T1-w imaging is the best sequence for BACTIP grading of endosteal scalloping, followed by fluid-sensitive STIR sequences.

Keywords

BACTIP - endosteal scalloping - MRI - GSI - central cartilage tumor - chondrosarcoma

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. August 2024

• References

• 1 Patel A, Davies AM, Botchu R, James S. A pragmatic approach to the imaging and follow-up of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and knee. Clin Radiol 2019; 74 (07) 517-526
• 2 Van Den Berghe T, Delbare F, Candries E. et al. A retrospective external validation study of the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee. Eur Radiol 2024; 34 (08) 4988-5006
• 3 Scholte CHJ, Dorleijn DMJ, Krijvenaar DT, van de Sande MAJ, van Langevelde K. Wait-and-scan: an alternative for curettage in atypical cartilaginous tumours of the long bones. Bone Joint J 2024; 106-B (01) 86-92
• 4 Laitinen MK, Thorkildsen J, Morris G. et al. Intraosseous conventional central chondrosarcoma does not metastasise irrespective of grade in pelvis, scapula and in long bone locations. J Bone Oncol 2023; 43: 100514
• 5 Kim JH, Lee SK. Classification of chondrosarcoma: from characteristic to challenging imaging findings. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15 (06) 1703
• 6 Ahmed S, Jubouri S, Mulligan M. Incidental long bone cartilage lesions: is any further imaging workup needed?. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50 (06) 1189-1196
• 7 Sharif B, Lindsay D, Saifuddin A. The role of imaging in differentiating low-grade and high-grade central chondral tumours. Eur J Radiol 2021; 137: 109579
• 8 Jurik AG, Hansen BH, Weber K. Solitary enchondromas-diagnosis and surveillance: Danish guidelines. Radiologe 2020; 60 (Suppl. 01) 26-32
• 9 Vojković R, Martinčič D, Mavčič B. Diagnostics and treatment of enchondromas. ZdravVestn 2022; 91: 345-352
• 10 Thorkildsen J. Chondrosarcoma in Norway 1990–2013: Risk Stratification without Histology [PhD thesis]. Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo; 2021
• 11 MSK Radiology 4 U. BACTIP. Bactip.co.uk. Accessed March 8, 2024 at: http://bactip.co.uk/
• 12 Subramanian A, Hegde G, Azzopardi C. et al. TI VIBE inversion MRI: an alternative to CT for imaging of hip pain. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 19: 196-199
• 13 Jwala Satya Siva Raghu Teja K, Haleem S, Rajakulasingam R, Jalli J, Kanaka Durgaprasad B, Botchu R. Does T2 inversion aid in identifying disc pathologies?. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 23: 101620
• 14 Davies AM, Patel A, James SL, Botchu R. A retrospective validation of an imaging protocol for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee. Clin Radiol 2019; 74 (12) 962-971
• 15 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 159-714
• 16 Shah A, Iyengar KP, Botchu R. Gray scale inversion imaging (GSI) in trauma and orthopaedics. J Orthop 2022; 30: 62-65
• 17 Patel A, Haleem S, Rajakulasingam R, James SL, Davies AM, Botchu R. Comparison between conventional CT and grayscale inversion CT images in the assessment of the post-operative spinal orthopaedic implants. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 21: 101567
• 18 Xu J, Hu Y, Zhou R, Sun S, Chen H. Zero echo time vs. T1-weighted MRI for assessment of cortical and medullary bone morphology abnormalities using CT as the reference standard. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58 (03) 752-760