CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2024; 57(04): 256-262
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788999
Original Article

Normative Data of Grip Strength and Pinch Strength in the Indian Population

1   Department of Hand Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
2   Department of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
,
Vishal Verma
3   Department of General Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Srinivasan Rajappa
1   Department of Hand Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Anil Bhat
2   Department of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, India
,
4   Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Mukund Thatte
5   Department of Plastic Surgery, Bombay Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.

Abstract

Background There is no normative study of transregional grip strength data available from India. Hence, a multicenter study is designed to obtain reference value.

Materials and Methods This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand. The study included three participating centers: one from the northern part and two from the southern part. Certified calibrated Jamar dynamometer and Jamar pinch gauge were used to measure the grip strength, key pinch strength, tip pinch strength, and tripod pinch strength as per the guidelines of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

Results A total of 1,019 volunteers in the age group of 18 to 60 years were studied. The mean grip strength in males and females was 38.18 and 24.06 kg, respectively. The mean key pinch strength was 8.52 kg in males and 5.97 kg in females. The mean tip pinch strength was 4.86 kg in males and 3.59 kg in females. The mean tripod pinch strength was 5.41 kg in males and 4.16 kg in females.

Conclusions All four strengths were lower in value when compared with American and other populations. The men had more strength than women. There was no relation to hand dominance. There was a correlation for age and height but no correlation with body mass index (BMI).

Institutional Review Board Approval

Institutional review board clearance was obtained for the study individually at three participating centers where the study was performed and the study protocols conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.


Authors' Contributions

Su.R. was the Principal Investigator for the project as a whole and for the project in Tamil Nadu, and also contributed to data collection and writing of the manuscript. M.P.G. was the Principal Investigator for the project in Karnataka and contributed to data collection. V.V. was the Principal Investigator for the project in Chandigarh and contributed to data collection. Sr.R. and S.G. provided logistical support and contributed to editing of the manuscript. A.B. contributed to designing the methodology and editing the manuscript, and was the coordinator of the ISSH Normative data project. M.T. was a patron of the ISSH Normative data project and contributed to editing the manuscript.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. August 2024

© 2024. Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Lam NW, Goh HT, Kamaruzzaman SB, Chin AV, Poi PJ, Tan MP. Normative data for hand grip strength and key pinch strength, stratified by age and gender for a multiethnic Asian population. Singapore Med J 2016; 57 (10) 578-584
  • 2 Anjum SN, Choudary P, Dimri R, Ankarath S. Comparative evaluation of grip and pinch strength in an Asian and European population. Hand Ther 2012; 17: 11-14
  • 3 Gilbertson L, Barber-Lomax S. Power and pinch grip strength recorded using the hand-held Jamar® Dynamometer and B+L hydraulic pinch gauge: British Normative Data for Adults. Br J Occup Ther 1994; 57: 483-488
  • 4 Mathiowetz V. Effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements. J Hand Ther 1990; 3: 195-198
  • 5 Li S, Zhang R, Pan G, Zheng L, Li C. Handgrip strength is associated with insulin resistance and glucose metabolism in adolescents: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011 to 2014. Pediatr Diabetes 2018; 19 (03) 375-380
  • 6 Lee SY. Handgrip strength: an irreplaceable indicator of muscle function. Ann Rehab Med. 2021; 45: 167-169
  • 7 Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P. et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21 (03) 300-307.e2
  • 8 Mullerpatan RP, Karnik G, John R. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for healthy Indian adults. Hand Ther 2013; 18: 11-16
  • 9 Vishwanath S, Vishal K. Normative data of grip and pinch strengths in healthy adults of Indian population. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2021; 15 (03) 178-183
  • 10 Koley S, Melton SA. Age-related changes in handgrip strength among healthy Indian males and females aged 6-25 years. J Life Sci 2010; 2: 73-80
  • 11 Koley S, Kaur N, Sandhu JS. A study on hand grip strength in female labourers of Jalandhar, Punjab, India. J Life Sci 2009; 1 (01) 57-62
  • 12 Kaur M. Age-related changes in hand grip strength among rural and urban Haryanvi Jat females. Homo 2009; 60 (05) 441-450
  • 13 Walankar P, Verma C, Mehta A, Author C. Study of hand grip strength in Indian population. Int J Health Sci Res 2016; 6: 11
  • 14 Balogun JA, Akomolafe CT, Amusa LO. Grip strength: effects of testing posture and elbow position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72 (05) 280-283
  • 15 Kamarul T, Ahmad TS, Loh WY. Hand grip strength in the adult Malaysian population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006; 14 (02) 172-177
  • 16 Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66 (02) 69-74
  • 17 Shaheen AAM, Omar MTA, Ali OI. Normative values of handgrip and pinch strengths in healthy female college students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Bull Fac Phys Ther 2021; 26: 1
  • 18 Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, Iversen I, Cummings R. Hand strength and dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1971; 25 (02) 77-83
  • 19 Thorngren KG, Werner CO. Normal grip strength. Acta Orthop Scand 1979; 50 (03) 255-259
  • 20 Schmidt RT, Toews JV. Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51 (06) 321-327
  • 21 Fraser C, Benten J. A study of adult hand strength. Br J Occup Ther 1983; 46 (10) 296-299
  • 22 Werle S, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Sprott H, Herren DB. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (01) 76-84
  • 23 Crosby CA, Wehbé MA, Mawr B. Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am 1994; 19 (04) 665-670