J Pediatr Infect Dis 2024; 19(06): 334-338
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789585
Original Article

Comparison of Frequently Used Fever Measurement Methods: Which One is the Best?

1   Department of General Pediatrics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
,
2   Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Türkiye
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Peripheral measurement sites and methods used to determine core body temperature were investigated, as there is still debate about which noninvasive core body temperature measurement method is the most valuable and accurate for each age group.

Methods Children aged 1 to 36 months were included in the study. The temperature was measured from the forehead (noncontact cutaneous), temporal artery (TA), axilla, and rectum. The rectal measurement was accepted as the reference measurement. A rectal temperature of ≥38.3°C was defined as fever.

Results The noncontact cutaneous, axillary, and TA measurements were 1.2, 1.1, and 0.7°C lower than rectal measurements, respectively (p < 0.001, <0.001, <0.001). The TA and noncontact cutaneous measurements demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with rectal measurements, whereas a strong positive correlation was seen between the axillary and rectal measurements. A cutaneous temperature of 37.8°C was found to have a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 81%, sensitivity of 34%, and specificity of 100% for detecting fever. The respective values were 80, 79.4, 23.5, and 98% for an axillary temperature of 37.5°C, and 90, 86.2, 52.9, and 98% for a TA temperature of 38°C.

Conclusion The commonly used fever measurement methods have high PPV and NPV and specificity but low sensitivity.

Authors' Contribution

G.İ.B. designed the study; C.A., G.İ.B. collected and analyzed data; C.A., G.İ.B. wrote the manuscript; C.A., G.İ.B. gave technical support and conceptual advice.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 December 2023

Accepted: 06 August 2024

Article published online:
01 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Wing R, Dor MR, McQuilkin PA. Fever in the pediatric patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2013; 31 (04) 1073-1096
  • 2 McGowan Jr JE, Rose RC, Jacobs NF, Schaberg DR, Haley RW. Fever in hospitalized patients. With special reference to the medical service. Am J Med 1987; 82 (3 Spec No): 580-586
  • 3 Batra P, Goyal S. Comparison of rectal, axillary, tympanic, and temporal artery thermometry in the pediatric emergency room. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013; 29 (01) 63-66
  • 4 Forrest AJ, Juliano ML, Conley SP, Cronyn PD, McGlynn A, Auten JD. Temporal artery and axillary thermometry comparison with rectal thermometry in children presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2017; 35 (12) 1855-1858
  • 5 Schuh S, Komar L, Stephens D, Chu L, Read S, Allen U. Comparison of the temporal artery and rectal thermometry in children in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004; 20 (11) 736-741
  • 6 Siberry GK, Diener-West M, Schappell E, Karron RA. Comparison of temple temperatures with rectal temperatures in children under two years of age. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2002; 41 (06) 405-414
  • 7 Wunderlich CA. On the Temperature in Diseases: A Manual of Medical Thermometry. London: New Sydenham Society; 1871
  • 8 Sund-Levander M, Forsberg C, Wahren LK. Normal oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary body temperature in adult men and women: a systematic literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 2002; 16 (02) 122-128
  • 9 Haddadin RB, Shamo'on HI. Study between axillary and rectal temperature measurements in children. East Mediterr Health J 2007; 13 (05) 1060-1066
  • 10 Edelu BO, Ojinnaka NC, Ikefuna AN. A comparison of axillary with rectal thermometry in under 5 children. Niger Med J 2011; 52 (04) 207-210
  • 11 Hayward G, Verbakel JY, Ismail FA. et al. Non-contact infrared versus axillary and tympanic thermometers in children attending primary care: a mixed-methods study of accuracy and acceptability. Br J Gen Pract 2020; 70 (693) e236-e244
  • 12 Allegaert K, Casteels K, van Gorp I, Bogaert G. Tympanic, infrared skin, and temporal artery scan thermometers compared with rectal measurement in children: a real-life assessment. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2014; 76: 34-38
  • 13 Odinaka KK, Edelu BO, Nwolisa CE, Amamilo IB, Okolo SN. Temporal artery thermometry in children younger than 5 years: a comparison with rectal thermometry. Pediatr Emerg Care 2014; 30 (12) 867-870