The Correlation Between CT Findings and Neurosurgical Intervention in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with Isolated Subdural Hematomas

Abstract

Objective In patients with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs), with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 13 to 15, isolated subdural hematomas (iSDHs) are identified as a prevalent category of intracranial hemorrhage. The primary objective of our research was to investigate the relationship between the characteristics of iSDHs, as revealed through computed tomography (CT) scans on patient admission, and the consequent necessity for neurosurgical intervention.

Materials and Methods This was a 1-year study, employing a prospective observational design at our institution. We enrolled adult trauma patients diagnosed with mTBIs and concurrent iSDHs, intent on documenting the hemorrhages' quantitative parameters such as maximum length and thickness, among other related variables. The eventual execution of neurosurgical procedures constituted our primary outcome, aiming to establish a decisive correlation between CT scan metrics of iSDHs upon admission and the imperative for subsequent surgical intervention.

Results A total of 50 patients were included in our study: 14 patients received a neurosurgical intervention and 36 patients did not. The neurosurgical intervention group had a mean maximum SDH length and thickness that were 38 mm longer and 9.6 mm thicker than those of the non-neurosurgical intervention group (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion In this study, we evaluated the odds of a neurosurgical intervention based on hemorrhage characteristics on CT, in patients with an iSDH and mTBI. Once validated in a second population, these data can be used to evaluate the necessity of interhospital transfers and to better inform patients and families of the risk of future neurosurgical intervention and prognosis.

Keywords

isolated subdural hematomas - mild traumatic brain injuries - neurosurgical intervention

Patients' Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or their parents who were included in this study.

Publication History

Article published online:
10 September 2024

• References

• 1 Faul MD, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States. Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, 2002–2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010
• 2 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Report to Congress on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Steps to Prevent a Serious Public Health Problem. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003. . Accessed February 15, 2018 at: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/mtbireport-a.pdf
• 3 Nishijima DK, Sena MJ, Holmes JF. Identification of low-risk patients with traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage who do not need intensive care unit admission. J Trauma 2011; 70 (06) E101-E107
• 4 Orlando A, Levy AS, Carrick MM, Tanner A, Mains CW, Bar-Or D. Epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury with intracranial hemorrhage: where should we focus predictive models for neurosurgical intervention?. World Neurosurg 2017; 107: 94-102
• 5 Sweeney TE, Salles A, Harris OA, Spain DA, Staudenmayer KL. Prediction of neurosurgical intervention after mild traumatic brain injury using the national trauma data bank. World J Emerg Surg 2015; 10: 23
• 6 Carlson AP, Ramirez P, Kennedy G, McLean AR, Murray-Krezan C, Stippler M. Low rate of delayed deterioration requiring surgical treatment in patients transferred to a tertiary care center for mild traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 29 (05) E3
• 7 Ditty BJ, Omar NB, Foreman PM, Patel DM, Pritchard PR, Okor MO. The nonsurgical nature of patients with subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage associated with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (03) 649-653
• 8 Huynh T, Jacobs DG, Dix S, Sing RF, Miles WS, Thomason MH. Utility of neurosurgical consultation for mild traumatic brain injury. Am Surg 2006; 72 (12) 1162-1165 , discussion1166-7
• 9 Joseph B, Aziz H, Sadoun M. et al. The acute care surgery model: managing traumatic brain injury without an inpatient neurosurgical consultation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 75 (01) 102-105 , discussion 105
• 10 Levy AS, Orlando A, Salottolo K, Mains CW, Bar-Or D. Outcomes of a nontransfer protocol for mild traumatic brain injury with abnormal head computed tomography in a rural hospital setting. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (1-2): e319-e323
• 11 Miller EC, Holmes JF, Derlet RW. Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 1997; 15 (04) 453-457
• 12 Wu C, Orringer DA, Lau D, Fletcher JJ. Cumulative incidence and predictors of neurosurgical interventions following nonsevere traumatic brain injury with mildly abnormal head imaging findings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73 (05) 1247-1253
• 13 Jagoda AS, Bazarian JJ, Bruns Jr JJ. et al; American College of Emergency Physicians, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52 (06) 714-748
• 14 Shih FY, Chang HH, Wang HC. et al. Risk factors for delayed neuro-surgical intervention in patients with acute mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage. World J Emerg Surg 2016; 11: 13
• 15 Maas AI, Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol 2015; 128: 455-474
• 16 Perel P, Edwards P, Wentz R, Roberts I. Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6: 38
• 17 Joseph B, Friese RS, Sadoun M. et al. The BIG (brain injury guidelines) project: defining the management of traumatic brain injury by acute care surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 76 (04) 965-969
• 18 Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K. et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001; 357 (9266): 1391-1396