Z Gastroenterol 2024; 62(09): e567
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789639
Abstracts │ DGVS/DGAV
Freie Vorträge

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): first results of the CheckMate 8HW study

G. Folprecht
1   Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Medizinische Klinik I. Hämatologie, Zelltherapie und Medizinische Onkologie, Dresden, Deutschland
,
T. Andre
2   Sorbonne Université, and Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, Frankreich
,
E. Elez
3   Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spanien
,
E. Van Cutsem
4   University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgien
,
L. H. Jensen
5   University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Dänemark
,
J. Bennouna
6   Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, Frankreich
,
G. A. Mendez
7   Hospital Universitario Fundacion Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentinien
,
M. Schenker
8   Centrul de Oncologie Sf Nectarie, Craiova, Rumänien
,
C. de la Fouchardiere
9   Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon Cedex, Frankreich
,
M. L. Limon
10   Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spanien
,
T. Yoshino
11   National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
,
J. Li
12   Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China
,
H.-J. Lenz
13   University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Los Angeles, Vereinigte Staaten
,
J. M. Mozo
14   Institut Català d'Oncologia, Badalona, Spanien
,
G. Tortora
15   Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rom, Italien
,
R. Garcia-Carbonero
16   Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Imas12, UCM, Madrid, Spanien
,
E. Cela
17   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
Y. Yang
17   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
M. Lei
17   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
L. Jin
17   Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, Vereinigte Staaten
,
S. Lonardi
18   Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCC, Padua, Italien
› Author Affiliations
 

Introduction: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC have poor outcomes with standard chemo±targeted therapies. NIVO±IPI are approved in previously treated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC in many countries, based on the phase 2 CheckMate 142 study

Objective: CheckMate 8HW (NCT04008030) is a randomized phase 3 study comparing NIVO+IPI with NIVO or chemo in pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. We report progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) at a prespecified interim analysis for NIVO+IPI vs chemo in the 1L setting.

Methods: Pts ≥18 years with recurrent or mCRC not amenable to surgery and MSI-H/dMMR status per local testing were enrolled across different lines of therapy. Previously untreated pts were randomized 2:2:1 to NIVO (240 mg)+IPI (1 mg/kg) Q3W (4 doses, then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), NIVO (240 mg) Q2W (6 doses, then NIVO 480 mg Q4W), or chemo±targeted therapies; treatments continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (all arms), or a maximum of 2 years (NIVO±IPI arms). For pts with BICR-documented progression with chemo, optional crossover to NIVO+IPI was permitted. Dual primary endpoints were PFS by BICR per RECIST v1.1 for NIVO+IPI vs chemo (1L) and NIVO+IPI vs NIVO (all lines) in pts with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Zoom Image
Abb. 1

Results: In the 1L setting, 303 pts were randomized to NIVO+IPI (n=202) or chemo (n=101); of these pts, 171 pts in the NIVO+IPI arm and 84 pts in the chemo arm had centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR result by either immunohistochemistry and/or polymerase chain reaction-based tests. With 24.3 months of median follow-up, NIVO+IPI demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in PFS vs chemo, with a 79% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.21 [95% CI 0.14–0.32]; P < 0.0001) (Table). No new safety signals were identified (Table).

Conclusions: NIVO+IPI demonstrated superior PFS vs chemo in previously untreated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. NIVO+IPI had a different safety profile compared to chemo, with fewer grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). These results support 1L NIVO+IPI as a SOC option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mC

präsentiert in der Sitzung: Individualisierte Präzisionsmedizin

Freitag, 04. Oktober 2024, 10:30 – 12:00, Saal 3



Publication History

Article published online:
26 September 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany