Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790565
Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) Technique with Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound for IGRT Tracking of the Prostate
Funding The authors have no funding information to declare. Clinical Trials None.

Abstract
Introduction Ultrahypofractionated radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer, also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), is an unprecedented modality of prostate radiotherapy and is still used very sparsely in Brazil. The use of fiducial implants and spacers may make it even more difficult to implement prostate SBRT on a large scale in Brazil. We describe a completely non-invasive technique for the treatment of localized prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Materials and Methods This is a case series study with 9 patients and 48 SBRT fractions analyzed. In our treatment protocol, we use the Elekta Versa-HD linear accelerator (Elekta, Stokholm, Sweden), a transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) with tracking and synchronization capabilities (Clarity 4D ultrasound system, Elekta), and the Monaco Planning System (Elekta). Displacements were measured in the three axes (lateral, longitudinal, and vertical). The discrepancy between the initial ultrasound location of the prostate and the location of the cone beam has also been documented.
Results The mean displacements were 2.02 mm, 3.12 mm, and 2.93 mm for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. The data show that treatment was interrupted in 14 of the 48 treatment fractions (29.17%), 8 (57%) with displacements greater than 5 mm and 6 (43%) with displacements between 3 and 5 mm.
The initial TPUS image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and its mean displacements for localization with the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm, and 1.5 mm, for the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. Using van Herk formula, a margin of 7.3 mm in the lateral directions, 9.35 mm longitudinally, and 7.74 mm vertically, would be required
Conclusion Here we describe an SBRT technique for prostate cancer that is completely non-invasive and allows for a high level of accuracy. Transperineal 3D ultrasound provides real-time position data to the prostate that can be used to gate the SBRT treatment, allowing for smaller, more personalized planning target volume (PTV) margins even without fiducial markers or spacers, which may be more applicable for low- and middle-income countries.
Authors' Contribution
IM: collection and assembly of data, conception and study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, provision of study materials or patient, final approval of the manuscript; AM: conception and study design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript review and editing and final approval of the manuscript.
Publication History
Received: 17 February 2024
Accepted: 28 June 2024
Article published online:
05 February 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
Igor Migowski, Arn Migowski. Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) Technique with Three-Dimensional Transperineal Ultrasound for IGRT Tracking of the Prostate. Brazilian Journal of Oncology 2025; 21: s00441790565.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790565
-
References
- 1
Instituto Nacional de Câncer.
Estimativa 2023: incidência de câncer no Brasil. INCA; 2022
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Lehrer EJ,
Kishan AU,
Yu JB.
et al.
Ultrahypofractionated versus hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiation
therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of phase
III randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148: 235-242
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Morgan SC,
Hoffman K,
Loblaw A.
et al.
ASTRO guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 8: 354-360
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Holmes OE,
Gratton J,
Szanto J.
et al.
Reducing errors in prostate tracking with an improved fiducial implantation protocol
for CyberKnife based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). J Radiosurg SBRT 2018;
5 (03) 217-227
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Mariados N,
Sylvester J,
Shah D.
et al.
Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial: Dosimetric
and Clinical Effects of Perirectal Spacer Application in Men Undergoing Prostate Image
Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92
(05) 971-977
MissingFormLabel
- 6 ANVISA [homepage na internet] [acessado em 10 de abril de 2021]. Disponível em:
https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/sistemas/consulta-a-registro
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Mendez LC,
Moraes FY,
Fernandes GDS,
Weltman E.
Cancer Deaths due to Lack of Universal Access to Radiotherapy in the Brazilian Public
Health System. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30 (01) e29-e36
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Widmark A,
Gunnlaugsson A,
Beckman L.
et al.
Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate
cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
Lancet 2020
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Parker CC,
James ND,
Brawley CD.
et al;
Systemic Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy
(STAMPEDE) investigators.
Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer
(STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018; 392 (10162): 2353-2366
MissingFormLabel
- 10 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) [internet homepage] [Accessed in March
14, 2021]. Available in https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Repka MC,
Guleria S,
Cyr RA.
et al.
Acute Urinary Morbidity Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate
Cancer with Prophylactic Alpha-Adrenergic Antagonist and Urethral Dose Reduction.
Front Oncol 2016; 6: 122
MissingFormLabel
- 12
van Herk M.
Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2004; 14 (01) 52-64
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Rasch C,
Steenbakkers R,
van Herk M.
Target definition in prostate, head, and neck. Semin Radiat Oncol 2005; 15 (03) 136-145
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Smith AL,
Stephans KL,
Kolar MD.
et al.
Prostate SBRT IntrafractionMonitoring with Transperineal Ultrasound, IJROBP 2017)
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Yu AS,
Najafi M,
Hristov DH,
Phillips T.
Intrafractional tracking accuracy of a transperineal ultrasound image guidance system
for prostate radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017; 16 (06) 1067-1078
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Han B,
Najafi M,
Cooper DT.
et al.
Evaluation of transperineal ultrasound imaging as a potential solution for target
tracking during hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018;
13 (01) 151
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Salter BJ,
Szegedi M,
Tward J.
et al.
3D transperineal ultrasound image guidance methods for prostate SBRT radiotherapy
treatment. ESTRO; 2015
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Robinson D,
Liu D,
Steciw S.
et al.
An evaluation of the Clarity 3D ultrasound system for prostate localization. J Appl
Clin Med Phys 2012; 13 (04) 3753
MissingFormLabel