Homeopathy
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791490
Commentary Article

Presentation and Analysis of the Online Evidence Gap Map, “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy

1   Research Center, University Paulista—UNIP, São Paulo, Brazil
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Ubiratan C. Adler
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
3   Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Carlos—UFSCAR, São Carlos, Brazil
,
Edgard C. de Vilhena
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
4   Faculty of Medicine, Santo Amaro University—UNISA, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Carla Holandino Quaresma
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
5   Departamento de Fármacos e Medicamentos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Adriana Passos de Oliveira
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
5   Departamento de Fármacos e Medicamentos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro—UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
,
Ednar N. Coimbra
1   Research Center, University Paulista—UNIP, São Paulo, Brazil
6   Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Alagoas—UFAL, Maceió, Brazil
,
Jorge K. Hosomi
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Carmen Veronica M. Abdala
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
7   Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde/Pan-American Health Organization—BIREME/PAHO, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Mariana C. Schveitzer
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
8   Department of Preventive Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo—UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Caio F.S. Portella
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Ricardo Ghelman
2   Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health—CABSIN, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was organized by the Brazilian Academic Consortium for Integrative Health (CABSIN) as requested by the Brazilian Ministry of Health (2019), with grants given by the program FIOTEC—Fundação Para o Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico em Saúde (grant number: VPGDI-014-FIO-20), and by BIREME/Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde/Pan American Health Organization (PAHO).

Abstract

Introduction and Objective This study presents and analyzes the content of an online Evidence Gap Map (EGM), “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition”, which graphically represents evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of human clinical trials in homeopathy that were published from 1991 to 2021. The EGM was built according to the guidelines of the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), adapted for complex interventions, to represent visually relevant evidence and research gaps.

Presentation of Evidence Gap Map Content The interventions, classified as rows, are characterized in the EGM not only by the homeopathic therapeutic strategy but also by individual medicines and potencies. The outcomes are listed in columns. The associations between both are represented by “bubbles” that refer to the corresponding SRs and whose colors indicate their quality level.

Synthesis of Evidence Gap Map Content From 239 citations identified, 51 SRs underwent complete characterization for the final construction of the EGM. A further in-depth quality analysis of each SR was performed to list the studied intervention/outcome associations described in each mentioned trial. At this step, those trials considered to have a high risk of bias by the authors of each SR were excluded from the EGM inputs.

Analysis of Evidence Gap Map Content The methodological quality of each of the EGM's SRs was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 criteria for level of confidence in an SR's results. Intervention–outcome associations were categorized into one of five effects of a homeopathic intervention: positive, potentially positive, ineffective, inconclusive, or negative.

Findings The EGM presents research evidence across a wide range of medical conditions, with substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions and clinical outcomes. Forty-two of the 51 SRs yielded inconclusive findings. AMSTAR-2 analysis identified seven high-quality SRs, in which reliable primary studies presenting positive or potentially positive results for different categories of homeopathy are cited and related to specific clinical conditions: fibromyalgia, otitis media, diarrhea, respiratory infections, menopausal syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.

Conclusion The EGM “Clinical Effectiveness of Homeopathy, 1st Edition” presents visually relevant research evidence that is scattered across a large number of medical conditions, showing substantial heterogeneity of homeopathic interventions, clinical outcomes, and research quality. To enhance the precision and relevance of future research, we recommend that the individualized homeopathic approach under investigation be standardized to the greatest extent feasible, and to use measures of well-being and quality of life as primary outcomes.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 02 January 2024

Accepted: 09 August 2024

Article published online:
24 December 2024

© 2024. Faculty of Homeopathy. This article is published by Thieme.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany